Quote# 127693
[Bolding mine]
TO: ALL POINTS BY: LYNDON LAROUCHE/TONY PAPERT/DAVID CHERRY
RE: MORNING BRIEFING FOR SUNDAY APRIL 13 2008
| MORNING BRIEFING
| Sunday, April 13, 2008
LAROUCHE: I have passed a copy of something which is the very beginning of a piece, to Jeff and to Gerry.
[...]
Now, the key to our work, and the key to my thinking, also, which is where the conflict comes with me, because my background is against Euclid, the whole issue against Euclid, against this kind of thinking, which is my whole life's experience. Since I was 14 years of age, when I first had an exposure to a geometry class and said, "This is bull****!" and I rejected the whole thing at that point. Because the minute you assume axiomatic restrictions, or the equivalent, arbitrarily, on the way you think, your mind is destroyed, your ability to do scientific work is crippled; because you're always going back, "Well, what's the proof? What's the proof?" And some ****head is saying, "No you have to start with Euclid" in effect, or "start with Descartes," in effect. "Yes, you can go to Riemann, but you have to start where science starts." It "starts" with what? With Euclid! And similar kinds of things. Radical reductionism! And radical reductionism is the characteristic with animals, not a human being. Animals are reductionists: they are sense-certainty creatures.
[...]
Now, I saw that in Germany: in Hitler Germany. It's exactly that. There's no distinction between the mechanism of the Obama movement and the Hitler movement--
none! Because the essential thing is not the particular prejudices you have. What functions is the way you think. In a human being, it's the
way you think that's important, it's not necessarily
what you think. Because it's the way you think that will lead you, ultimately to what you
will think. And the Obama movement is a fascist movement--by any historical standard. And you get an intimidation of people, who respond to what? They respond to a sense that there's nobody in society, in political power, who's doing a goddamned thing, about saving this nation, and its people. So people say, "You've got to
go along, to get along. Don't try to change the rules,
adapt to them."
Go with the majority popular opinion, even if it's stupid.
I mean: Obama is a racist. I mean, with an African father--he wasn't much of an African father, but was an African father of Kenya. He was part of a British operation, which took over Kenya, through MI5's operation. But this guy was away from Kenya, and he married a Margaret Mead type, a woman who had a number of successive husbands, like Margaret Mead did. Went out to the poor, brown people, in Asia, and had sex with them! It was called "Coming in Samoa." [groans, laughter] And she wore through a number of successive husbands, and by them, had various children. And therefore, you'll find Obama's ancestry, if you chase his family tree, everybody's climbing and swinging from the branches there--from all over the world! All parts of the world! This guy is the universal man. Every monkey in every tree, from every part of the world, has participated in the sexual act of producing him. And he works for organized crime--which is a branch of British intelligence.Lyndon LaRouche,
Lyndon LaRouche Watch 9 Comments [6/1/2017 7:25:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: JeanP