1 2 3 4 5 9 | bottom
Quote# 122100

Interesting thing about Jezebel: Jezebel always surrounds herself with EUNUCHS. A eunuch is a man who has been castrated so that his main focus can be on guarding his queen.

I can't help but notice as I watch this US election cycle play out in the news media how Hillary (who represents that Jezebelian spirit) has her own eunuchs too. They're not hard to spot. They're mostly a bunch of effeminate male news commentators who will not say one negative thing in the media about Hillary; nor will they allow anyone else to.

Their focus is on Donald Trump's alleged mistreatment of women. And that's the ONLY news story these guys will entertain; so much to the point where it's obvious they've sold themselves to be Hillary's eunuchs. They won't even avail themselves to ask her about those missing emails!

With all these real issues left sitting untouched on the table: Benghazi, those missing emails, the Wiki leaks, the money that was funneled through her and Bill's foundation sent to help rebuild Haiti that went to their American friends and cronies instead of to the Haitian people first, the economy, NAFTA, the mass incarceration of African-American men under draconian drug laws set in place by Bill Clinton (with Hillary's standing right by his side) - I really don't care what Donald Trump did with his hands back in '05.

That's nothing compared to what Hillary's hands did when she was deleting those 33,000 missing emails!

Check her resume: she's in full support of gay marriage and partial birth abortion: another trait of the late great Jezebel. Jezebel was named in honor of the god Bel (also spelled Baal); whose worship was conducted via gay sex rituals, orgies and the sacrifice of little babies.

Seems like nothing's changed much in how this spirit operates.

Interesting thing about Jezebel's eunuchs in the biblical story: they were the very ones who ended up tossing her out into the streets. That's a warning for Jezzy not to rely too heavily on her eunuchs to do her dirty work for her. Them eunuchs ain't loyal! Because when Jehu shows up: watch out! They'll switch sides at the drop of a dime!

Speaking of Jehu: he's described in the Bible as a rugged, sometimes uncouth type of guy. Pure alpha male type. When he drove through the streets in his chariot, folks knew to get out the way. He drove like a furious madman on a mission.

And it was THIS sort of man that God Himself raised up to bring about the ultimate end of Jezebel's reign, and to put an end to the house of her husband Ahab.

God always raises up an alpha male to deal with a Jezebel. That's the only type of man anointed by God to do so!

Let that one marinate. *Read about Jezebel, Jehu and her end in 2 Kings chapter 9.

Mack Major, Facebook 32 Comments [10/19/2016 7:26:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 21

Quote# 122098

Aside from the left's control of the indoc centers (formerly known as schools) and campaign finance, Hussein won in 2012 due to the stupidity and degradation of many voters, as Mr. Rush has pointed out, but also due to the corrupt slimestream media and massive, outright vote fraud. Expect more of that this time, provided that the Witch can stay on her feet and not have an obvious mental episode in public. The polls are close enough to hide the vote fraud, and Paul Rino and the other "Republican" leaders will go along with it.
Then the madwoman can get us into a nuclear war and destroy the world...which has been, all along, the goal of her ultimate master.

William B Stoecker, WND 36 Comments [10/19/2016 7:25:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 122096

To understand the election, think about the movie “Jaws.” There is a real lesson here!

I see Trump as Capt Quint (Robert Shaw) on the boat, Orca, in the movie "Jaws." He's salty, drunk and says incorrect things. He spits in your face. BUT... He's gonna save your rear. You may not like what he says but, in the end, you and your family survive.

Hillary, on the other hand, is the SHARK. She wants to eat your boat (open borders, immigration, failed foreign policy). Her eyes roll into the back of her head. She only cares about feeding herself and protecting her territory. She cares not a whit about the little fishes—she eats them and spits them out. She only cares about protecting the other big fish.

Vote for the fishing boat captain.
Not the shark.

It’s that simple.

Mike Huckabee, Mike Huckabee's Facebook page 39 Comments [10/19/2016 7:25:30 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 122091

Fundies object to being caught redefining words . . .



In the tug of war between religious freedom and nondiscrimination rights, the weight seems to be pulling toward the latter.

At least that's the view of 17 religious leaders — including LDS Church Presiding Bishop Gérald Caussé — who addressed their concerns with the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights' recent report in an Oct. 7 letter to President Barack Obama, House Speaker Paul Ryan and Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch.

The report, titled "Peaceful Coexistence: Reconciling Nondiscrimination Principles With Civil Liberties," comes down squarely on the side of civil liberties for individuals, the letter says, and "stigmatizes tens of millions of religious Americans, their communities, and their faith-based institutions, and threatens the religious freedom of all our citizens.


At issue, wrote the signers representing Catholic, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, black church and other institutions, are religious views on marriage, the family, contraception, abortion and "the source of human dignity."

Their letter cited as an example a statement by Commission Chairman Martin Castro, who wrote: "The phrases 'religious liberty' and 'religious freedom' will stand for nothing except hypocrisy so long as they remain code words for discrimination, intolerance, racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, Christian supremacy or any form of intolerance."

"No American citizen or institution [should] be labeled by their government as bigoted because of their religious views, and dismissed from the political life of our nation for holding those views," the letter declared. "And yet that is precisely what the Civil Rights Commission report does."

"The report adopts a stunted and distorted version of religious liberty, suggesting that claims of religious conscience are little more than a cloak for bigotry and hatred," Hatch said. "I reject the false picture of religious liberty presented."

various religious leaders, salt lake tribune 23 Comments [10/19/2016 3:17:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Mister Spak

Quote# 122088

I flew in a plane what is different between that space and the space higher up?

Where did Jesus go to when he was seen ascending into heaven?
If Space is above the clouds where is heaven?
You see there is a difference between Man and God the heavens above and heaven.

You met them but you cannot tell if they were really on a mission or hypnotised.
You have no built in lie detector and even the devil can appear as an angel of light.
I agree you felt appeased and reassured they were nice men telling you the truth but how did Satan manage to fool Adam and Eve, even after God had been so good to them?



Sassy, Religion and Ethics 19 Comments [10/19/2016 3:07:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Nearly Sane

Quote# 122085

We have no knowledge of how thought processes work, how they are perceived or where they originate from in scientific terms. If you are demanding a scientific explanation of what drives our thought processes you will not find one. The closest I can get to answering your question is to point to the quantum events occurring in your brain which have no discernible cause, as this could be the gateway for spiritual interaction, be it from your own soul, or the wilful temptation of Satan.

Alan Burns, Religion and Ethics 22 Comments [10/19/2016 3:05:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Nearly Sane

Quote# 122084

Race is a very significant, if not the single most important factor when defining foreignness for most people in the world.

''And actually, a lot of the models who look non-white are often not foreigners at all! The west has been a multi-racial society for a looooong time, and it is just as likely that the white model is from Ukraine while the Asian model is from San Francisco.''

If you actually live according to this ideal, then all the power to you. But like it or not, that is not how most people, including myself, operate. So pardon me for not jumping on the politically-correct post-racial bandwagon. Immigrants in the will ALWAYS remain outsiders to some degree, no matter how small, in relation to the mainstream culture that was established by the dominant ethnic group, which was Whites for the West.

And here's the key point: that is ABSOLUTELY fine by me. It is simply a part of human nature to be tribal; the liberal mentality of thinking that we're somehow above the laws of nature is simply pure hubris. So just as I don't expect my racial/ethnic group to be fairly represented in the west (though some of us still rightfully try their damn hardest for such), whites shouldn't be surprised to find their status waning in an increasingly racially-aware China.

Jccheapentertainment, Reddit 22 Comments [10/19/2016 3:05:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 122080

(An excerpt from Hannah Livingston's BBC Documentary, America's Hate Preachers. Bolding is from the original quote.)

ANDERSON: To normal people, homosexuality [and] pedophilia are disgusting. To a normal person.

LIVINGSTON: Why do you put pedophilia and homosexuality in the same group?

ANDERSON: They are in the same group! Because any man who would have sex with another man would have sex with anything. Period. Like, I’ll put it this way: Any man who would have sex with another man would have sex with an animal.

LIVINGSTON: That’s blatantly not true, though!

ANDERSON: It is true! That’s reality. Even if you don’t think it’s reality…



LIVINGSTON: What do you think homosexuals should do, then?

ANDERSON: Kill themselves, as far as I’m concerned, because they’re horrible, wicked people. They’re just gonna keep molesting and destroying people. So I don’t have any advice for homosexuals, except to put a bullet in your own head so that you don’t molest my kids or anyone else’s kids.

Steven Anderson, Friendly Atheist 34 Comments [10/19/2016 3:04:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 122075

A religious right activist came right out loud and said what Mike Pence has been hinting at with all his talk about Donald Trump’s broad shoulders.

Dave Daubenmire posted a video Tuesday morning assuring like-minded Christians that Trump’s boasts about grabbing women by the genitals with impunity should concern them less than the possibility of a person with female genitalia becoming president, reported Right Wing Watch.

“Women and men may be equal, but I think it’s pretty clear that the Bible teaches us that women should not be in authority over a man,” said Daubenmire, who lost his job coaching high school football in Ohio after requiring players to pray with him and expressing offensive views about LGBT people and others.

Daubenmire, founder of Pass the Salt Ministries and an unsuccessful candidate for the Ohio statehouse, clarified why many conservative Christians are willing to overlook Trump’s immoral behavior.

“Here’s the point I’m making,” Daubenmire said. “With all that’s going on with Trump and everybody screaming and hollering about that, when is the last time your pastor stood up in the pulpit and said, ‘Hey, listen, we cannot vote for Hillary Clinton because women are not to have authority over men’?”

He stated explicitly what rumors about Clinton’s ill health and frailty have only implied.

“If we want to follow the Bible, that would sure be a good place to start, wouldn’t it?” Daubenmire said. “Rather than worrying so much about the immorality of a sinful man, what about the biblical principle that when a woman rules over a man … it’s a sign of judgment of the Lord?”

Dave Daubenmire, Raw Story 28 Comments [10/18/2016 5:00:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 122072

You almost undo a scientifically unverifiable ''privilege'' by suggesting a scientifically unverifiable ''bigger scheme of things''.

The question why something and not nothing of course takes all this in it's stride.

the claim that we are not special is just the reverse of thinking we are special. Again Shakespeare has it with his iteration of ''why something and not nothing''
''To be or not to be''

Indistinguishable from Vlad, Religion and Ethics 14 Comments [10/18/2016 5:00:18 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Nearly Sane

Quote# 122069

I understand that some liberals are so stupid that they can't comprehend that not everyone blindly follows a letter behind a name, that some of us actually hold our politicians accountable when they lie or vote in way we don't agree with. Liberals have a habit of following lock step because they can't think for themselves. They need their nanny government to tell them what to do, how to think, and what to say. So it is not surprising in the least that they can't grasp the concept of Trump not giving a damn if the establishment pukes in the GOP fall to the way side as we voters kick their butts out this election season.

You see, most Trump supporters know that this isn't just about electing a president. This is about much more. We've been telling you for a year now why we are voting for Trump. You all keep thinking it's about Trump. You all keep missing the point. You all keep failing, as does the Hillary camp - it's why she struggles so hard to get her "easy win" to the White House...because none of the idiotic liberal twits who are supporting establishment are listening.

With any luck, the liberal psychos who support Hillary will be having a very, very bad November and beyond. I'm going to laugh at every last one of you for four solid years if Trump wins. Not only because all we're going to here is incessant angry whining from liberal psychos who supported Hillary the evil beast, but because we will finally have a chance to get this country back in order...that includes booting out a few useless twits who had the audacity to call themselves "Republicans".

Three Wolves In Snow, City-Data 65 Comments [10/18/2016 3:21:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: ScrappyB

Quote# 122068

What a great opportunity to show the world what true Christianity is. What a great opportunity to explain Christian forgiveness.

There's a debate raging about whether a man's past should condemn him. I think about the woman at the well. Christ forgave her very recent adultery. Yet we're struggling today with forgiving something Trump said 11 years ago about the attitudes he displayed many years before that.

Really? Maybe this is more of a commentary on the modern legalistic Church. Many of Trump's opponents are in legalistic cults like Mormonism. His top critic is Glenn Beck who touts the teachings of Joseph Smith often in his radio show.

Calminian, Christian Forums 33 Comments [10/18/2016 3:21:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 122066

Women rarely have empathy in regards to men. It’s probably why the Bible begins with a woman fucking things up for all of humanity.

Putmeincoach, Tumblr 46 Comments [10/17/2016 3:15:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 21
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 122065

I'm never a lesser of two evils person, but with Hillary, there's not even the same universe. She is an abject, psychopathic, demon from Hell that as soon as she gets into power is going to try to destroy the planet. I'm sure of that, and people around her say she's so dark now, and so evil, and so possessed that they are having nightmares, they're freaking out. Folks let me just tell you something, and if media wants to go with this, that's fine. There are dozens of videos and photos of Obama having flies land on him, indoors, at all times of year, and he'll be next to a hundred people and no one has flies on them. Hillary, reportedly, I mean, I was told by people around her that they think she's demon-possessed, okay? I'm just going to go ahead and say it, okay?

They said that they're scared. That's why when I see her when kids are by her, I actually get scared myself, with a child -- with that big rubber face and that -- I mean this woman is dangerous, ladies and gentleman. I'm telling you, she is a demon. This is Biblical. She's going to launch a nuclear war. The Russians are scared of her.

[...]

Imagine how bad she smells, man? I'm told her and Obama, just stink, stink, stink, stink. You can't wash that evil off, man. Told there's a rotten smell around Hillary. I'm not kidding, people say, they say -- folks, I've been told this by high up folks. They say listen, Obama and Hillary both smell like sulfur. I never said this because the media will go crazy with it, but I've talked to people that are in protective details, they're scared of her. And they say listen, she's a frickin' demon and she stinks and so does Obama. I go, like what? Sulfur. They smell like Hell.

Alex Jones, Media Matters 45 Comments [10/17/2016 3:15:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 21
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 122062

Pat Robertson on Monday declared that Donald Trump was the “clear winner” of Sunday night’s presidential debate, and the televangelist asserted that the GOP candidate’s admission that he groped women was simply “macho” talk.

“Trump was the winner,” Robertson opined on his 700 Club television program. “Basically, the pundits were writing him off.”

The TV preacher argued that Trump was like the mythical Phoenix because he had performed well at the debate just days after the leak of a video tape, in which the Republican nominee bragged that he could grab women “by the pussy” without their permission because he was a star.

“A guy does something 11 years ago, it was a conversation in Hollywood where he’s trying to look like he’s macho,” Robertson said. “And 11 years after that they surface it from The Washington Post or whatever, bring it out within 30 days or so of the election and this is supposed to be the death blow and everybody writes him off, ‘Okay, he’s dead, now you’ve got to get out of the way and let Mike Pence run the campaign.'”

“The Donald says no,” he continued. “He’s like the Phoenix. They think he’s dead, he’s come back. And he came back strong. So, he won that debate.”

A scientific poll conducted by CNN following Sunday night’s debate found that 57 percent of people said that Hillary Clinton won, while 34 percent thought Trump came out ahead.

Pat Robertson, Raw Story 58 Comments [10/17/2016 3:12:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 122061

Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, who has previously registered his concern about the prospect of gay space colonies, connected homosexuality to Noah’s Flood on a radio program yesterday.

Gohmert, who was guest hosting the “Point of View” radio show, interviewed conservative activist and “Reaganbook” founder Janet Porter about her anti-LGBT film “Light Wins,” which featured appearances from Gohmert and other prominent Republicans such as Rand Paul and Mike Huckabee.

The congressman quoted a portion of the movie in which Porter, who believes that same-sex marriage caused Noah’s Flood, alleges that the only time in history besides today “where homosexual unions were authorized as marriage was in the ‘Days of Noah.’”

“We know homosexuality was widespread in Greece and Rome and Babylon and especially in Sodom and Gomorrah but that’s a little scary that it wasn’t legal except before the flood,” Gohmert commented.

Porter responded that this statement “tells you where we are in the overall timeline—“

“Does it ever,” Gohmert interjected.

Porter then claimed that Hillary Clinton’s support for LGBT rights will further push the world towards the Last Days because “this was the issue that led to the flood and that this will be a sign of what’s to come that ‘as it was in the days of Noah so it will be in the coming of the Son of Man.’ If we don’t correct this we, then we are crying out for judgment, we are crying out for the end of the world as we know it.”

Louie Gohmert and Janet Porter, Right Wing Watch 19 Comments [10/17/2016 3:12:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 122060



Anonoymous, Facebook 31 Comments [10/17/2016 1:54:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 122059

A man with a functioning libido is public enemy number one in the increasingly bizarre United States of America, a debased nation that liberalism is destroying. Putting tampons in men’s restrooms is just fine, creating 600 genders out of thin air when every other species gets by with two genders is fine, but a rich and powerful man talking about having sexual desire for women and making accurate comments about how women let alpha males do whatever they want has caused the castrati in the media to call into session an impromptu kangaroo court of persecution. Trump is also being given the Julius Caesar treatment by his own party.

The same feminist nation that bought 80 million copies of Fifty Shades of Grey, a book women got hot and bothered reading that features far worse language and actions than the secret recording of Trump, is suddenly aghast when a real life billionaire is revealed to have been talking about trying to fuck some chick and making moves on women. Tepid comments have been enough to cause a stir in the Cucklican establishment, in which anything but gelded deference towards women is verboten. A recording of Trump made my a lowlife media jackal named Billy Bush caught him making the following thought crime comments:

"Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything. When you’re a star, they let you do it… You know I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait."

Any man with two functioning testicles and any level of experience with women knows Trump is exactly right. Women turn into instant sluts around rich and powerful men. Hypergamy is the most powerful force in the universe. They absolutely “let you do it.”

Trump is also being called a sexist for making these comments about Nancy O’Dell.

"I moved on her and I failed. I’ll admit it. I did try and fuck her. She was married. And I moved on her very heavily. I see her, she’s now got the big phony tits and everything. She’s totally changed her look."

Why is this even an issue when it’s a recording of a supposedly private conversation? Do the sycophants in the media think Slick Willy talked any differently when he was discussing the women he was diddling when he was the governor of Arkansas and later the President? Or when he was flying down to a pedophile’s private island?

Even though Hillary’s obvious pathological lying, criminality and health issues have been swept under the rug, a man displaying a modicum of testosterone was enough to send the 2016 campaign into a frenzy, and the media into overdrive conducting one of their infamous witch hunts against those not in the Marxist/globalist claven.

They did not seem to be bothered by, and even glorified Fifty Shades of Grey, however, a book featuring explicit erotic scenes of dominance and submission, bondage and discipline and BDSM conducted by a sadistic billionaire. The irony, as usual, is completely lost on vapid mediaites.

Relampago Furioso, Return of Kings 98 Comments [10/16/2016 12:52:49 PM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 122057

Japanese train conductor blames foreign tourists for overcrowding

Rail company reprimands conductor who made announcement blaming foreigners for inconveniencing Japanese passengers

A railway company in Japan has reprimanded a conductor who blamed the large number of foreign tourists on a crowded train for inconveniencing Japanese passengers.

The outburst will have done little to help Japan’s attempts to become a more welcoming destination for foreign visitors as it prepares to host the 2019 rugby World Cup and the Tokyo Olympics a year later.

Japan’s successful pitch for the 2020 Games made much of the country’s reputation for omotenashi– traditional hospitality and service.

But there was precious little omotenashi on display when the conductor addressed passengers on a Nankai Electric Railway express train bound for Kansai international airport near Osaka on Monday morning.

“There are many foreign passengers on board today … this has caused serious congestion and is causing inconvenience to Japanese passengers,” said the conductor, a man in his 40s.

A Japanese passenger reported the incident to a station attendant at the airport, questioning whether the conductor’s wording was acceptable.

The conductor, who has not been named, later defended his choice of words: “I heard a male Japanese passenger at [another station] yelling: ‘All these foreigners are a nuisance,’” the Mainichi Shimbun quoted him as saying.

“I made the announcement to avert trouble and had no intention of discriminating [against foreign passengers],” he said.

A Nankai Electric spokesman told the newspaper that the firm had previously received complaints about foreign visitors with large suitcases, but added: “Whether people are Japanese or non-Japanese, the fact remains that they are our passengers. Language that sets them apart [from other passengers] is inappropriate.”

The incident follows an accusation by South Korean tourists that a sushi restaurant in Osaka deliberately smeared their orders with eye-watering quantities of wasabi, a pungent condiment that should be used sparingly.

The restaurant chain Ichibazushi apologised but denied accusations of racism, saying its chefs had decided to use excessive amounts of wasabi after other foreign diners had previously requested larger dollops for added piquancy.

“Because many of our overseas customers frequently order extra amounts of pickled ginger and wasabi, we gave them more without checking first,” the chain’s management said. “The result was unpleasant for some guests who aren’t fans of wasabi.”

It was not clear how many such incidents – labelled “wasabi terrorism” on social media – had occurred, but some disgruntled diners posted photos of sushi containing twice as much wasabi as usual.

Whether or not the incidents resulted from misunderstandings, the potential for friction between visitors and local people is likely to increase as Japan gains popularity as a tourist destination.

A record 2.05 million people visited the country in August, according to the Japan Tourism Agency, including 677,000 from China, 458,900 from South Korea and 333,200 from Taiwan.

Japan’s government hopes to double the number of foreign visitors to 40 million in 2020, and expects a tourism windfall of 8tn yen (£63bn).

anonymous train conductor, Ichibazushi restaurant chefs, theguardian.com 17 Comments [10/15/2016 1:42:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 122056

Just wondering what the truth is re: Columbus; some say he was Godly and a devout Christian, some say he truly wasn't and was in actuality not very 'nice' at all.

If he was a Godly man, the accusations of him being bigoted and cruel to the Native Americans simply cannnot be true unless he was not a true born-again believer in Christ.

There is this growing swell of states who are choosing to call this holiday weekend "Indigenous Peoples' Day Weekend" because of this notion of Columbus being an awful man; I suspect this is just more anti-America propaganda but don't want to assume.

Thanks

XMaryX, Rapture Ready 47 Comments [10/15/2016 10:54:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 122055

Feminism - Feminism is not about equal rights for women; but rather, special privileges for women. Feminism is rooted in rebellion against God. Biblically, every husband is the head of the marriage, which controls the body, the wife. Anything with two heads is a monster! By seeking equality of authority in marriage, women have filled the divorce courts. Feminists typically focus upon extreme cases of domestic violence, to justify completely doing away with husbandly authority. The results have been tragic—fornication, abortion, lesbianism, fatherless children, millions of women without a husband or children, broken homes, more prisons, et cetera. Isaiah 3:12, “As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.” In ungodly America today, men have been castrated by the feminist-controlled courts, so that men no longer see marriage as a good thing. There's too much liability. The risk-to-benefit-ratio of getting married is no longer appealing to men. Actor Robin Williams said that divorce is like ripping a man's wallet out through his testicles. Can you blame him, when his former wives took him to the cleaners in court, receiving hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars in divorce property settlements? No wonder Robin Williams commit suicide! Feminism destroys a man's power to be the rightful head of his marriage and home. Thus, women rule over men, and children become juvenile delinquents, as in America today. Feminism is a satanic fraud, intended to destroy the family.

David J. Stewart, JesusIsPrecious.org 25 Comments [10/15/2016 10:01:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 122054

Don't resort to violence unless an alt-right person attacks you first.

If you want to be spiteful there are other ways of putting the alt-right in their place, such as finding out their employers and getting them fired for views they express.

If they are self-employed and their job isn't related to social media, then you just find out who their customers are and inform said customers of who they are purchasing goods and/or services from.

TestOfTide, Neogaf.com 63 Comments [10/15/2016 3:41:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 122053

Yesterday, Family Research Council President Tony Perkins reacted to the news that “the Pentagon has published a handbook for transgender service” by claiming that it would be better if the military disbanded altogether than accommodate transgender service members.

Perkins spoke about the new handbook on his “Washington Watch” program with Jerry Boykin, the FRC’s executive vice president.

“So we see the administration pushing forward without congressional input on integrating transgenders [sic] into our nation’s military,” Perkins said. “What else can this administration do to the military other than just disband it?”

Later, he added: “I probably need to take it back when I said that the only thing worse the president could do would be to disband the military. Actually, that might even be better. We’re probably better off without a military that is not compromised, because we think we have a military that’s defending our country and able to do that but we have a military that in many ways is a hollowed-out shell.”

Tony Perkins, Right Wing Watch 19 Comments [10/15/2016 2:56:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 122052

Our founding fathers warned us repeatedly to never let this day come, but the day has now come upon us. I mean, think about it. The Democratic Party on [inaudible] when Barack Obama ran, they literally booed God out of the Democratic Party. I mean, not only ran Him out and took His name out of their platform, they booed Him out. So, you get what you ask for, so here we are. So the bottom line is, [when someone said they] entertain the thought of maybe voting for Hillary Clinton, I said, they ran God out of the Democratic Party. She has a hard time telling the truth because the Evil One is the Father of Lies, according to Jesus, and she’s living proof of it, my man.

Phil Robertson, Right Wing Watch 26 Comments [10/15/2016 2:56:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 122051

Men and Marriage – Real Marriage – By Mark Driscoll
3:52 to 4:21; 10:06 to 11:54; 23:55 to 25:17

“This is what it means when the Bible uses the language of “head,” that we [as men] are responsible in the sight of God for the well being of our wives and children. And so men in this sermon on Men and Marriage you need to know that if your wife struggles or fails to grow in Godliness, if your children struggle or fail to grow in Godliness, it is your responsibility in the sight of God.”

“Your understanding of marriage has to be covenantal, not contractual. And if I had to break it down into its simplest form I would articulate it this way. Contract is about me [the man] negotiating terms that benefit me. It’s selfish. Covenant is about me giving myself to you for your well being. It’s servanthood. Covenant is about your [the woman’s] benefit. Contract is about my [the man’s] benefit. . . .Covenantal thinking says God wants me to become what you need. God wants me to love you as you need. God wants me to serve you as you need. God wants me to invest in you as you need. Covenant is about what is best for you. Contract is about what is best for me. It’s the difference between selfishness and servanthood. And in a covenantal marriage a husband and a wife are in covenant with God through faith in Jesus Christ and they are to be in covenant with one another and the Bible says as Jesus loves and serves the Church so the man as the covenant head is to similarly lovingly lead his wife. So that she flourishes and grows in the grace of God.”

“So men let me tell you what your responsibilities are. And these apply as well to the ladies. I’ll give you four responsibilities. Number one, your first responsibility. Christian! Repent of sin, trust in Jesus, death burial and resurrection. Read your Bible, grow in grace, pray. Be involved with God’s people in the Church. Christian. First things first. Your covenant relationship with God. You’re here today trying to fix your marriage and you don’t know Jesus? That is not your first priority. Your first priority is to get into relationship with Jesus and out of that relationship with Him He will change you so that you can be a better spouse. Your second responsibility is to your spouse. That means husbands, your wife; wives, your husband. Your next priority, your next responsibility is spouse. Then third, parent. If God should bless you with children; loving them, serving them, raising them, investing in them, and growing them. And let me say this, if you invert these you will destroy your children and your marriage. . . .And number four, your fourth responsibility is worker.”

Now onto the substance of Libby Anne’s critique. Libby Anne focuses on the idea of men protecting women from other men and how absurd this idea supposedly is. In reality men protecting women from other men is exactly how a civilized society works. Male headship in marriage and male authority in general is actually about supporting and protecting women globally from all hardships and dangers they may encounter; dangerous men being only one of the dangers patriarchy is meant to protect women from. Still one of the purposes of patriarchy is certainly to protect women from abusive male behaviors.

In how Mark Driscoll sets things up the father is supposed to guide and protect his daughters until the daughter is “handed off” to her husband who then serves to protect his wife. This makes perfect sense. Using the quote from Mark Driscoll that Libby Anne highlights:

“Let’s say for example there’s a daughter, and she’s got a close relationship with her covenant-head, Christian dad. That headship protects her from other boys who want to come along and be her head, tell her what to do, set an identity for her, abuse her, endanger her. It protects her from other young men who would come to take that place of headship in her life. Similarly with a wife, if the husband loves her like Christ loves the church, and he takes responsibility for her, that protects her from bad men, bosses, men who have ill intent or those who are perverted.”

In the way Driscoll is setting things up a young woman will be protected by her father from miscellaneous boyfriends who may be irresponsible or exploitative or even abusive in their behaviors towards women. Similarly a woman will be protected by her husband from men who might be exploitative or abusive towards his wife.

This makes perfect sense because a girl’s father has a strong connection and investment in his daughter and is also older and wiser than his daughter and is more intimidating than his daughter. This is compared to any miscellaneous guy who might be interested in the daughter but has not shown himself to be trustworthy or to be seriously committed to the daughter or to have good prospects to be able to provide for his future family. If a potential boyfriend passes through the various hurdles and shows himself to be the best man and commits to marriage then he has earned the status of the woman’s husband and can then play the role of protector himself. Until then however the man has not earned the right to take on the headship role in relation to the father’s daughter. Same thing regarding the husband protecting his wife from various men who might mean his wife harm or be exploitative towards her. The husband has already shown his high investment and trustworthiness towards the woman; otherwise he would not have been able to marry her in the first place. The husband then has earned the right to serve as the head and protector of his wife and is in the position to protect his wife from the various miscellaneous men who might harm her. The man who has committed to the woman and has shown good character towards the woman outranks all the other men interested in the woman or in lesser relationships with the woman.

Libby Anne is acting as if the concept of men protecting women from other men is an absurdity since if a man is dangerous by virtue of being a man then nothing is gained from an inherently dangerous man “protecting” women from other inherently dangerous men since the so called male “protector” is just as likely to turn around and attack the woman himself once he is given the trusted status of being the woman’s “protector.” The problem with this line of thinking is that some men are more dangerous than other men. The minority sociopath man is more dangerous than the majority socially well adjusted man. The man who has made a high commitment and investment in a woman is less dangerous than the man who only has a casual relationship with a woman. A man who can act as a neutral third party whose primary interest is the well being of the woman, such as a woman’s father, is more trustworthy than a potential suitor who has the obvious self-interest of trying to gain a relationship with the woman. Women are most protected when the most trustworthy and least dangerous categories of men are empowered over the least trustworthy and most dangerous categories of men. The whole point of empowering fathers to protect their daughters from potentially harmful boyfriends and empowering husbands to protect their wives from potentially harmful relationships with other men is so that the men who are the most trustworthy and protective of women’s interests will be in charge.

Jesse Powell, secularpatriarchy.wordpress.com 16 Comments [10/15/2016 2:55:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
1 2 3 4 5 9 | top