Quote# 111109

At one farbrengen the Rebbe explained:

The only way to guarantee that people should follow the straight and just path is to instill in them a faith in the Creator of the world.

[...]

And for absurd reasons, mentioning the Creator and Conductor of the world is not allowed in school! As a result, hundreds of thousands of Jewish children and millions of non-Jewish children who are enrolled in public schools do not hear or know anything about the Creator! The only solution to this is to institute a moment of silence at the beginning of the school day, which is designated to thinking about the Creator. This, the Rebbe assured the critics, would influence the rest of the day.

Reb Gutman Locks, Mystical Paths 21 Comments [7/25/2015 3:44:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 111108

The nature of man is to serve God. When that nature is highjacked by the devil, it is called becoming either a democrat or a Muslim.

Pat Dollard, Twitter 24 Comments [7/25/2015 3:37:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 22

Quote# 111107

Saying most Muslims don't support jihad cuz they're not terrorists is like saying most Americans aren't patriots cuz they're not in the army

Pat Dollard, Twitter 18 Comments [7/25/2015 3:37:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 111105

Polls saying that the majority approves of gay marriage are completely falsified leftist propaganda like "you can keep your health plan."

Pat Dollard, Twitter 17 Comments [7/25/2015 3:36:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 111104

(after being told to look up the e. coli long term evolution experiment)

So did the e. coli turn into something other than bacteria? I think not. Oh look the bacteria adapted so there's proof it will eventually become an orangutan! Whatever.

Evolutionism is a religion, there is NO proof, NO exclusive evidence for it - none. "the evolution of birds from dinosaurs" don't make me laugh, all they have is speculation and assumption, birds from dinosaurs has never been observed and will never be repeated or "confirmed" - ever. Oh, they teach it in schools as science, therefore it must be true. Now you're trying to tell me birds from dinosaurs has been observed in a lab? Do tell.

Oboehner, Christian News Network 22 Comments [7/25/2015 3:36:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 111098

The Scriptures say, “My soul shall make her boast in the Lord, the humble shall hear of it and be glad.” This proud world isn’t glad to hear anyone boasting about God, or giving Him praise. He sends rain on drought-stricken California and no one in the media gives Him a drop of thanks. Someone almost gets eaten by a shark, and few truly thank God that he is alive.

Watch now and all the proud God-haters (those who don’t believe He exists) jump in and blame Him for tragedies. They do this because they don’t understand that there are at least two wills of God. There is His perfect will and there is His permissive will. In His permissive will, He allows people to be struck by lightning, eaten by sharks, to fall off cliffs, to get cancer, and He permits people to die at a rate of 54 million every year. But no death, no tragedy and no blessing happens outside of His permissive will—“For from Him, and through Him and to Him are all things.” Not a single ray of sun finds its way 93 million miles from its surface to the earth, without God allowing it to find its mark.

He has permitted you to hear this. May you humble yourself and bow to His perfect will by obeying the gospel. It is not His will that any perish, but that all come to repentance.

Ray Comfort, Ray Comfort's Facebook page 22 Comments [7/25/2015 3:05:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 111096

POKEMON IS SATANIC

I'm a dedicated Christian, and judging by what I've seen on television, Pokemon is a game full of violence, slavery and abuse. Forcing creatures to fight for their own entertainment is appalling and I cannot believe it's rated for children. I can also not believe it has been going on since the 90s, causing evil to spread.
Yesterday, my son asked what I was fearing. He asked for a Pokemon game, I was shocked, because I knew my sister let her sons play that dreadful game, and my sister is dim and does not follow in Gods footsteps.
I told him no and immediately sent him to his room. I then phoned my pastor and he recommended steering my son away from that awful game. My son is 11 years old and he has become very cold with me ever since I said no. He called me insane, which is a reflect of what the game can do to a child.
I will not allow any kind of things in my house that are in any way offending God. I threw away all my sons Harry Potter books and forbidden him from watching the movies.
I am a good mother, and any parent who lets their kids play Pokemon, will grow up with a power obsessed, violent child worshiping Satan. Evolution is also in the game, which is against Gods words. it is disgraceful and should be banned.
My son has insulted me ever since this has happened. He told me his friends play Pokemon, so I have told him he is not allowed near them again. It is causing a drift between our family. I have told my son various times that he will go to Hell if he plays Pokemon but the message is not sinking in.

I fear Satan is taking him from me.

Say no to Pokemon, Godlike Productions 33 Comments [7/25/2015 2:55:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 24

Quote# 111093

TV preacher Pat Robertson asserted on Tuesday that the Supreme Court would eventually rule that humans could legally have sex with animals and children.

During the “Bring It On” segment of The 700 Club, a viewer expressed outrage over a deceptively edited video in which a conservative group claimed that Planned Parenthood was selling body parts from fetuses.

“The pro-abortion community says a fetus isn’t ‘human’ until born, but they are obviously human enough to harvest their very human body parts,” the viewer wrote. “How could this kind of sociopathic hypocrisy possibly be legal?”

According to Roberson, the Supreme Court had “messed things up” by legalizing abortion and same-sex marriage.

“They haven’t allowed the reason or our collective consciousness to play, but they’ve come up with these strange rules,” he explained. “Same thing about separation of church and state, etc.”

“You watch what’s going to happen now,” the televangelist continued. “They’ve just said abortion is a constitutional right, they have said homosexuality is a constitutional right, they’ve said now homosexual marriage is a constitutional right.”

“Watch what happens, love affairs between men and animals are going to be absolutely permitted. Polygamy, without question, is going to be permitted. And it will be called a right.”

Co-host Terry Meeuwsen predicted that “relationships with children” would also be legalized.

“There have been groups that have been trying to push that for a long time,” she pointed out.

“Well, they’re going to succeed now,” Robertson agreed. “Because intellectually, you can’t get around these Supreme Court decisions.”

“We are stuck with a fix doctrine of five old men on the Supreme Court,” Robertson concluded, adding, “They’re not all old anymore.”

Pat Robertson, RawStory 25 Comments [7/25/2015 2:54:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 111092

[ note this person also is an atheist btw ]

Iget how pro-choicers can see this and feel repulsed and angry. No-one wants to see a pregnant 9 year old, no one. Not me, not betterthanabortion, nobody. It breaks my heart that this little girl is going through this, that she was sexually assaulted, and now she is facing a pregnancy. It’s absolutely upsetting, of course, and I hope whoever did this to her is punished accordingly. The thing about being pro-life is that we view all humans completely equal to one another, even humans in the uterus. So when the baby is born and the mother is in the process of healing physically and emotionally, there will be a new little boy or girl in the world who will be able to live their life. Both children can live, nobody has to die in order to recover from a tragedy. It is very possible for this girl to recover and live her life happily and healthy. I’m sure years from now when the baby is grown she will be happy that she’s alive. See, when I view this situation, as awful as it is, I see 2 children that need to be protected. While the pro-choice side jumps to murder as the only way this girl can recover and live a happy life.

mother-child-life, tumblr 22 Comments [7/24/2015 2:56:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 111086

Chicks with six pack abs: A problem that is, thankfully, for now, small enough to tuck away for use as a hypothetical. But maybe not for long. It seems our world is careening toward an androgynous, sexually unimorphic hell, populated with femininity-crushing fatties or muscular femmes carving their bodies up to high-T specs.

Reader mac speaks for the vast majority of men,

i agree about the abs. don’t like a big beer gut on a girl of course but i’ve never been into visible abs on a woman either. i don’t understand why young guys these days all want their women to be ripped like men.

They don’t. They just say that for PR.

not feminine at all and ugh is right.

Rippling six packs on women are almost as nauseating as distended rolls of pork fat. Both obscure in their own ways the nascent feminine form struggling to emerge and soak up the sun of horny male attention. A perfect female stomach is flat, soft, and subtly terraformed as if to guide the adventurer to the furrow below it.

So while obesity is the epidemic destroying the natural beauty of America’s women, there is an opposite trend, much smaller but almost as destructive, toward hardened, fibrous, X-Fit borgs anchored atop a fulcrum of narrowed boyhips, tromping city streets in flats and trainers, shoulder checking personal space invaders, all the while denying the truth of their essential female nature.

The answer to obesity isn’t the masculinization of the female form.

Softness and slenderness, these are the gravitational forces of purest femininity.

Serena Williams would weep, but she lost touch with that part of her femaleness a long time ago.

Hope Solo wouldn’t weep; she’d just crush your nads in her clenched fist like they were walnuts.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 29 Comments [7/24/2015 2:54:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Yuu

Quote# 111084

But does he have tight game? The evidence gathered to date says… the tightest! For instance, examine closely how well Trump handled his own Realtalk™ charge that could’ve blown up in his face given leftoid Hivemind and GOP (one and the same) hatred of him.

Trump said Juan McCain is no war hero, because, paraphrasing, there’s nothing heroic about getting captured.

I happen to agree, in part, with Trump here. A sure sign of national decline is bastardization of the native language (to suit the needs of ruling class propagandists and, less ominously, to strengthen group identification among the lower classes). As Greg Cochran has noted, we live in a culture where the hero has MOVED ON to the right side of history, becoming a “hero through suffering” rather than a “hero through deed”. This is supposed to be an improvement. It’s not. It’s a dumbing-down of heroism, so the mass of mediocrities can feel like they have a spiritual connection to the hallowed Hero’s Hall every time they fall into a depressed resignation about their miserable lives.

I specify that I agreed with Trump “in part”, because the Merriam-Webster definition of “hero” does include, under line item #2, the description of the hero as someone with “noble qualities”. You can argue that, once captured, possessing the grit and fortitude to stick it out for years until release is a type of heroism.

So there was wiggle room there for Trump to take a legit hit from his enemies to the…. “””right”””. (hahaha i keel myself!)

But did Trump back down when the Hivemind assembled its buzzing battalions to perforate him on a, ahem, trumped-up charge of insufficient patriotism and groveling toward a veteran with a stellar record of lapping up the precum off Vicente Fox’s Spanish-European glans? (A charge, it should be mentioned, not a single member of the Hivemind conglomerate takes seriously in his own life.)

No. Not only did Trump refuse the offer he couldn’t refuse, he struck back with guns twice as big, twice as fast, and ten times as lethal.

This fuckin guy. ????

As wags have dubbed him, Trump is a kind of morph of Realtalking internet commenters and Duke Nukem. Here he is on peabrained cuckservative Rick Perry, after Perry swallowed a load of Hivemind jizz and tried, feebly, to oust Trump from respectable GOP circlejerks:

And look what Trump did to that most effete of GOP supracucks, Lindsey “gaypedoface” Graham, (who called Trump a “jackass”). Skip to minute 26:00 to see Trump brandish Graham’s real cell number, asking the studio audience to call Graham for clarification on his past request for Trump’s campaign assistance. It is quite the slashing shiv.

Trump has tight game.

– He reframes his opponents’ attacks.
– He goes on the offense, never allowing himself the womanly comfort of the defensive crouch.
– He never apologizes. Especially not when his accusers are such gratuitous phonyfucks.
– He is socially savvy, and knows how to speak to the common man.
– His upgraded third wife is a hottie. And not just “for her age”.

If Trump is President, no one will have to humiliate himself pretending that a First Gorilla is a highly fuckable beauty.

Trump is such a BAD BAD RACIST EGOTISTIC MAN that he currently sits atop the Republican polls. Game can get you laid, and it can help you become leader of the free world.

President Donald Trump.

Isn’t it about time the Presidency was occupied by an alpha male worthy of the office? You know, alpha males like we used to have with the Founders?

If nothing else, Trump makes what would have been a tedious, insipid non-race with no import besides greasing the skids to national dissolution into something interesting to watch. Trump has pushed the Overton Window so wide, its gaping hole resembles Andrew “RawMuscleGlutes” Sullivan’s prolapsing rectum.

Trump fucks with the status quo, and the fucking is good.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 30 Comments [7/24/2015 2:53:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Yuu

Quote# 111080

Governments will continue to become more socialist because more women will vote, and women need socialist governments to pay for their whore spawn. The reason they don't care that beta's are leaving the plantation is because they see how women are propped up and taken care of. The alpha's (who they only want to fuck) are either not good marriage material or want nothing to do with it - so the women don't want marriage anyways. Marriage was just a pain in the ass for women - they did it as a means to and end, that end being a mans wallet. Now they access ALL men's wallets through the state.

There will be a tax war. Men saying "fuck it" will continue to be taxed more and more to pay for more and more bastard alpha babies. Governments will continue to create more insidious ways of getting men to pay for children that are not theirs. They will also bring in more immigrants from the most vile sewers of the world to get the vote from yet more.... socialist-dependent individuals. Impoverished immigrants with language barriers and barriers to the workforce are sheep - they will vote in droves for the governments that pander to them the most. Governments know they don't need marriages or babies from marriages. They can import voters from every corner of the earth.

Economies will crumble - women are actually waiting for this. They believe in the lies of the feminist utopia, where the rich white men at the top of the towers fall to their deaths, the towers topple and gold spills into the streets for everyone to plunder. They have no real knowledge of what the real repercussions of this will be - they think it will be handsome alphas fucking all the women while betas toil in the mines and obediently pay their taxes.

That's not what is going to happen. Before it's all over they will say "Oh no, what have we done?!"

These cries will fall on deaf ears.

Insidious_Sid, Going Your Own Way 10 Comments [7/24/2015 2:48:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: Yuu

Quote# 111079

Im no Issac Asimov, so bear that in mind when reading this.

Personally, I think marriage will go the way of the mechanical typewriter.Some folks of certain religious or traditional socieities & families thereof will do so, but for the most part it'll fade into history.

As others have noted marriage is becoming obsolete, although IMO the pressure will come from females vs males. There arent enough unplugged men to make a dent in the matriarchy- for every committed man who leaves the system ten more become shackled to it.Rather women will be so disgusted by the spineless fem-dudes their moms created that they'll be repulsed at the notion of shacking up with any 'guy'.I live in a rural area of America and am amazed at the general feminized nature and thinking of average guys nowadays.Forget about urban cities. At times walking through and interacting with people in LA made me feel like I was Don Draper time travelling to 2015.Why the hell would a female shack up with a dude who knows less about a car motor and spends more time in the bathroom prepping then she does?

"Money,duh" you might say in response.
But you dont need a marriage to do that.A simple cohab arrangement is enough in many places, and fairly soon the governments of the world will get hip to the fact that the dudes who dont have women in their lives have a LOT of disposable income . If 80% of the dudes in society are unattached beta males with no kids and no wife, fairly soon someone's gonna realize taxing those guys will pay for a lot of Mr Thundercock's progeny.

Thats how things went in ancient Rome, and thats how things are likely to play out for us.We'll be served with a summons to present proof of gay marriage ,alimony expenses paid ,a court order for child support or a documented relationship with a female....or pay a 40% income tax until we do.The reason?

"All men should share the burden to pay for child support, because patriarchy.Whats more important-a kid or your classic 1965 Mustang restoration?"

At first to sell the "Bachelor Tax" theyll apply it to females as a gesture of "equal burden", but that'll be a non-binding price ceiling. They'll find a beta to happily vouch for being in a relationship so she can dodge the taxman, who wont be encouraged to enforce female recievables due anyways .

Meanwhile , we single dudes will be looking over our shoulders every time we use an ATM.Next floor in the elevator of decline after that is polyamory-ive already seen a few examples of this in LA.One woman in a relationship with a harem of dudes who exclusively 'date' her in return.

The financial squeeze will justify part of this. Want to dodge the 40% bachelor tax, Mister Bluepill? Go find a bored fat girl who's willing to vouch for you to the IRS that you're a taken man.Of course nothing is free in this world......and you'll have to prove to Miss Fatso you have the commitment required to join her roster.

As for the alpha's, itll be a lonely club-moving between harems means pissing off a few women. Itll be the lowest social category of public society; staying out of jail & poverty will mean fake ID's and quick feet.Plate spinning for males will require CIA tradecraft to avoid imprisonment.

I hope we dont suffer a Big Collapse ; the only thing worse then living in a matriarchy is wandering a post-industrial disaster filled with desperate bluepill males ,ruthless whores ,and easy accessed personal weapons with no law or order.You think guys are thirsty simps NOW....just wait until a society of feminized she-dudes have to figure out how to live without Amazon Prime and extended warranties. Just remember-most forms of pornography require electricity to work. As does the production of birth control.

Octavian, Going Your Own Way 16 Comments [7/24/2015 2:47:08 PM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Yuu

Quote# 111072

Hello all GLP, I know that the shills and trolls are going to have fun with this thread because I am about to hit many high pitch cords that NASA has even dumbed down with sweet music, SO LETS BEGIN,SHALL WE....

We have all been duped by NASA and other space companies thinking that planets are inhabitable places like the Earth, but guess what, they are wrong and have been bought out by FALLEN ANGELS to keep you dumbed down about what really is in space. Before I continue please read the scripture below:


Jude 1:13
Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; WANDERING STARS, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.

Now take notice above were it speaks about WANDERING STARS, in which are FALLEN ANGELS. We should all know how many of our words which we use daily originate from GREEK words, am I correct?

Well guess what? The GREEK word for WANDERING STAR is " Aster-Planetes" or PLANETS! Planets! That is why the Greeks and other minorities worshiped the Planets like Jupiter which are FALLEN ANGELS!!!

Therefore I come to the conclusion that EARTH is not a planet but is the ground plane of the whole universe.

Therefore how many planets are documented to be contained in our solar system not including the Earth and sun and including Pluto? 7!!!!

Seven planets= 7 Stars

How many fallen angels are under satans rank? There are 7 fallen angels which are kings under Lucifer in the kingdom of darkness!!!! Unite the seven!!

Those who have seen LieKillers YouTube channel should understand alot clearly what I am talking about.

Jupiter=Abaddon= Jupiter Ascending = King and angel of the Bottomless Pit= Abaddon is Jupiter ascending out of the bottomless pit!!!!!!Wow, yes I know.

There is nothing hidden that shall not be made abroad.

I will like to give thanks to GOD for revealing this to me and I hope that you have been blessed through

ThankYouFatherGiverOf?Wisdom, godlike production 19 Comments [7/24/2015 2:29:42 PM]
Fundie Index: 20

Quote# 111071

Does anybody know why all the Planets of Science are named after Fallen angels? (Greek Gods) Anybody? Anybody at all?
2Enoch.30:[4]On the first uppermost circle I placed the stars, Kruno, and on the second Aphrodit, on the third Aris, on the fifth Zoues, on the sixth Ermis, on the seventh lesser the moon, and adorned it with the lesser stars.


Kruno, Aphrodit, Aris, Zoues, Ermis. "Sound Familiar?"

- Saturn is the god of agriculture. The associated Greek god, Cronus, was the son of Uranus and Gaia and the father of Zeus (Jupiter).

- Jupiter (a.k.a. Jove; Greek Zeus) was the King of the Gods, the ruler of Olympus and the patron of the Roman state.


- Mars (Greek: Ares) is the god of War.

- Venus (Greek: Aphrodite; Babylonian: Ishtar) is the goddess of love and beauty.


So why are scientist in love with the fallen Angels? Why is every Planet named after one of them? Sure those Fallen angels brought Greece to the heights of their power, sure the knowledge afforded by those angels gave even us today the incentive for competitive athletics (Olympics), drama, democracy (USA), oratory, rhetoric, biology, zoology, and even the atomic theory, wow, thanks satans!!!!

And don't tell me that those were the olden days where scientist were still nostalgic of ancient deities and may have even believed in GOD, no my friends, as early as 2003 the Planet UB 313 was spotted and named Eris on September 13, 2006.


2enoch - Ermis

Eris (latin Discordia) is the Greek/Roman goddess of strife and discord.


Where are you science-guys? Come on out you losers, come prove to the World how wonderful living the lie is without the belief of GOD and teaching our children the same. How great its been discovering planets and having to name them all after the satans. (Fallen angels)

Steven Stronghold, godlike production 21 Comments [7/24/2015 2:29:28 PM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 111067

Who do you SAY JESUS IS?

Upon that answer you are saved or damned

You can be a degreed scholar known for quoting the bible and go straight to hell when you die. The devil isn't stupid and loves quoting the bible against believers but he doesn't really believe it either (and by the way the devil is called the "accuser" in the bible, he goes accusing others of wrongdoing no matter how legit or not because he is a liar).

Liberals LOVE critique and NOT facts these days and fool only their own.

Do YOU have a lifestyle of calling someone names no matter how the evidence speaks? Do you assume and call names because a celebrity or leader told you what to think today?

"Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God (1 Cor. 6:9,10, NASB).

The acts of the sinful nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God (Gal. 5:19-21).

For of this you can be sure: No immoral, impure or greedy person—such a man is an idolater—has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of such things God’s wrath comes on those who are disobedient. Therefore do not be partners with them (Eph. 5:5-7)."
All of that not SOME but ALL of that message is true. Hear that often in Huffington, Vox, Slate, Salon or Yahoo?


Peter Ward, Patheos 26 Comments [7/24/2015 3:37:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 111065

Look around this planet and you’ll notice that this place wasn’t constructed to accommodate us. It was constructed for God. So much of this earth we can’t even survive in: scorching deserts, deep oceans, freezing mountain peaks. In the Bible, God boasts of making flowers bloom in the desert where no human eyes will see them. Why does He bother? Because this world isn’t about us. It’s about Him. Everything that God creates is for His benefit. So when we thumb our noses at Him, tune Him out, redefine Him, boss Him about, and actually tell ourselves we’ve triumphed over Him because He isn’t instantly roaring back, we’re so blind. We’re such fools. He’s lured us so effectively into His trap that we didn’t even notice when we crossed the line of no return. It is so dangerous to try and dominate the Almighty Creator. To insist that He revolve around us as ancient Israel does all throughout the Bible—how insane we are to think God would ever really agree to such an agenda. Yahweh says over and over in the Old Testament that He will not share His glory with anyone. As we soak in His glory on a daily basis without seeing any lightning strike, we decide His warnings are nothing but air. But just wait. This world is far too limited to provide satisfying means of revenge for a God whose Name is Jealous. It simply doesn’t bother God to let us rebel our little hearts out while we’re here, because He’s got Hell waiting for us—a place with torments that we can’t even begin to fathom. It won’t be anything like these descriptions we find in the Bible—those are all earthly metaphors which are only meant to teach general concepts. The real place in eternity where God’s enemies will end up is going to be one of torments which our tiny minds can’t even conceive of. God solemnly warns us not to mess with Him or He will make us sorry. He warns us that we’ll pay for our defiance on the other side. He says that even if we end up in Heaven, there will be consequences to pay. We think He’s exaggerating. How wrong we are (see The Eternal Cost of Defying God: A Warning for Christians).

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 11 Comments [7/24/2015 3:37:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 111063

In the Old Testament, when He was predicting the future fall of some nation or empire, Yahweh did what we find Him doing here in Revelation.  He would predict the same fall over and over again using a lot of imaginative metaphors.  Then He’d throw in some mourning songs that were really meant to serve as mockery.  To understand this let’s use a modern day analogy.

Suppose there are two women named Amy and Heather.  Amy thinks Heather is her best friend until the day she finds out that Heather is having an affair with Amy’s husband.  Amy reacts to this whole situation very immaturely: she flips out and makes up her mind that she’s going to kill Heather.  She’s going to kill her in the cruelest way she can think of, because she really wants Heather to suffer terribly.  But before she actually kills Heather, Amy goes over to Heather’s house and tells her, “One day I’m going to kill you, Heather.  And when I do, it’s going to be horrible for you.”  You see, Amy is so consumed with hate that she no longer has any fear of being caught.  She is in such a rush to see Heather upset, that she flaunts her future plans to murder Heather, not even worrying about the possibility that Heather might try to get help.  Now let’s say that after Amy freaks Heather out with her murderous plans, Amy then launches into a long mocking speech about how other people will react to Heather’s death.  Amy says stuff like:

“On the day you die, when your mom finds out, she’s going to be like, ‘Oh no!  Not my baby girl!  Not my precious daughter!’  But it will be too bad for her, won’t it?  Because you’ll be dead and there’s nothing anyone will be able to do about it!  And when my adulterous husband finds out, he’ll be like, ‘Oh no, not Heather!  You mean I dumped my wife for nothing?  Gee, maybe I should have thought before cheating on the woman that I vowed to be faithful to!'” 

As Amy mockingly puts words in other people’s mouths, she’s talking like Yahweh often talks in His prophecies against other nations. 

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 17 Comments [7/24/2015 3:28:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 111062

To love God for who He really is—that is the greatest gift we can ever bring Him. To cherish Him as our greatest Treasure after all the delusions have been stripped away—to love the God who kills and the God who heals with equal fervor. We should be seeking to base our love for God not on all the glorious things He can do for us, but on the real truth about who He is. The mere fact that He created us demands a loyalty and devotion which far surpass what we would offer to any created being.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 10 Comments [7/24/2015 3:27:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 111061

Religious conservatives descended on the Hood County Commissioners meeting in Texas on Tuesday demanding that LGBT books be censored or banned from the local public library, but ultimately lost out to those who argued for freedom of speech and tolerance.

After a local Tea Party chapter began circulating requests to have two LGBT-themed books — This Day in June and My Princess Boy — removed from the Hood County library Children’s section, residents swarmed the Commissioners’ court to speak out on the issue.

Many opponents said that their objections were based on their Christian faith.

One woman explained that the government employees and President Barack Obama had lost their “fear of the Lord.”

“The Founding Fathers designed our Constitution from Bible principles as Moses was instructed to bring the law down to the people… So, America was founded on God,” she insisted, imploring the commissioners to compare the United States to the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah.

Another common theme among Hood County residents was the notion that LGBT books were an effort to “indoctrinate our children.”

“That is their main goal,” one man said. “These books are not the problem. Sin is. I ask you to not celebrate sin, to justify it or rationalize it. Place these books in the dustbin of history with all the other books that help to destroy our society.”

One woman compared children’s books about LGBT people to children’s books with graphic depictions of dead animals or books written by the Ku Klux Klan.

One of the last women to speak warned the commissioners that judgement day was coming.

“The slippery slope is now and we all will face decisions,” she argued. “When our Lord Almighty comes, it will all be played back. Make a difference, for you will be held accountable. And this is important.”

“This is not a topic that our God would be happy with,” the woman noted, turning to the audience. “There is no fruit that comes from a man and a man and a woman and a woman. And if there is, it is not of God!”

Hood County Tea Party chapter, Raw Story 30 Comments [7/24/2015 3:27:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 111056

When my mother-in-law passed away, some of her old stuff was shipped out to us in case we might want it. In this box, were some statues and trinkets that she had purchased as souvenirs from her travels. One of them, was an all-white porcelain statue of a Chinese geisha girl, holding out her arms and hands in a peculiar way. One of the hands looked like it may have at one time been broken off and temporarily repaired, so I was wondering if I should apply a permanent fix to it, or if it was even worth saving at all.

As I was holding it, I began to feel vaguely uncomfortable with it, and wondered if it was spiritually o.k. or not to keep. So I asked my kids for a second opinion.

One shrugged and said they had sensed something evil about it at first, but as that feeling quickly went away, they couldn’t be real sure. So they went to see if there was more information on it over the internet.

My oldest son however, wanted it out of the house immediately. He said he could hear foreign voices coming from the statue, singing and chanting in tongues, and he knew that they were demons. As the minutes went by, he became more and more distressed over it, because their voices were getting louder and louder, and more threatening.

So I decided to bless it with our blessed olive oil and claim it in the name of Jesus. As soon as the blessing oil touched the statue, my oldest said the demons were shrieking and howling in pain and anger, and were coming out of the statue. But they soon went back to their odd chanting and singing, this time even louder than before. My internet searcher then reports back to me, telling me that this statue is an actual demon goddess that people in China pray to, in their homes. My oldest interrupts to say that he felt the Holy Spirit telling him that we NEED to get rid of the statue, NOW.

At that point, one of the demons physically attacked my son. It threw him down onto the stairs, (as he tried to run away,) and then wrapped its tendrils around his throat and tried to choke him, while another smaller one sat on his chest to try and silence him by suffocating him. My kids could only stare at the demons, unable to move or speak, frozen in fear and terror, as they watched them viciously attack their older brother. (This was odd behavior for some of them; normally they don’t let them spook them, they simply cast them out in the name of Jesus.) It sounded horrible; I could hear my son’s screams of sheer terror; he kept repeating over and over: “NO! DON’T LET IT TAKE ME! GET IT OFF OF ME! MOM!! HELP ME!” And then a moment later, ”PLEASE! GET RID OF THE STATUE!!! NOW!!!!”, as he tried to claw away at his own neck the suffocating strangle hold of the demon’s grip. I looked into my son’s eyes, and could see the absolute panic and terror that he was feeling reflecting out from them. But I myself could not see any demon at all; all I could see were strange markings of something around his neck, and his face grow red and bulge as he kept struggling and gasping to pull in a breath of air.

At first I looked for the obvious signs of a ‘too-tight’ shirt collar, or anything else that might have caused such a reaction, and a part of me couldn’t help but wonder if my son was just faking it to get attention. Till I looked up and seen all the eyes of my children starring at the same demons that was on top of him in horror. They were all starring at the demons, not at my son. Then I knew it was indeed real.

I cried out for my husband, (who had heard all the commotion and had been wondering what was going on, but had remained downstairs working on his computer,) and asked him to quickly take the statue and “get it out of this house!”

So he came up and took the statue outside. Meanwhile I went and grabbed my book entitled “Prayers that rout demons”, (scriptures and prayers based on them that are indexed for immediate battle-ready use,) and started claiming them out loud, and casting out in Jesus name whatever was attacking my son. I had to shout them out, and say them with great energy. I could then slightly sense the demon sneer at me, as it seemingly loosened its grip on my son and disappeared.

So I asked the kids if they still felt the demons, and one told me that they could still hear them, and another told me they could see the thin black ropes, coming from the outside, still trying to attack us.

I asked the child that seen the thin black ropes where they were coming from, and was pointed towards the window, on the left side. We go outside, following the trails of black rope, not knowing where their father had put the statue, (he was back downstairs working again,) and were led directly to the statue, right where the lines were seen to be coming from.

I took the statue, and along with my kids, went down to the fire pit. We built up a fire, lit it, and when we thought it was going strong enough, we put the statue in it.

Within the next minute or so, the fire went out.

So we rebuilt the fire, this time making it bigger and stronger, right on top of the statue. It was not easy. This was a fire that for some reason did not want to burn. But I asked the Lord to please help us with the fire, so it got going pretty good. Ten to fifteen minutes later, the fire around the statue had dissipated, leaving the rest of the fire around it still burning. We kicked the rest of the fire out, and I went to go pick up the statue with a stick, figuring it was now way too hot to hold. But the Holy Spirit told me to go ahead and pick it up with my bare hands.

It was icy cold. Not a single blemish or smear of soot had disfigured it.

My eldest son cried out to me again, asking me to smash it, but I was already one step ahead of him. I was trying to find a brick to smash it with, but most near me were still way too hot from the fire to use. (I had just burned my fingers on one, finding that out the hard way.) So a brick from the other side of the fire pit was found, and with great force, I smashed the delicate porcelain with one square blow. I must admit, at this point I half expected it to be resistant to being smashed as well, so I think I may have used a bit too much force, for the bricks above it and underneath it ended up being cracked and broken as well. I was going to keep breaking it up into dust, but the kids said it was no longer necessary, as the black trails had now dissipated in the air like smoke does on a breezy day.

Dreams of Dunamis, Dreams of Dunamis 48 Comments [7/24/2015 3:21:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 27

Quote# 111054

(after being told evolution has been observed in a laboratory)

You observed a whale becoming a cow in a laboratory? Billions of years? I highly doubt it, evolutionism is every bit the religion that Christianity is.

One must give up nothing in regard to the pseudo-scientific method that describes evolutionism.

Oboehner, Christian News Network 35 Comments [7/24/2015 3:20:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 111053

You are in a religious cult if your so-called “church” is using multiple Bible versions!!! You had better only use and trust the trustworthy King James Bible!!! Pastors who criticize the King James Bible are effectively teaching that we do not have a perfect Bible today. So then why read it, if the omnipotent God of the universe was incapable of preserving His “very pure” words (Psalms 119:140) unto every generation as He promised in Psalms 12:6-7?

Since the Word of God is our authority, we must have it. The Bible is a church's charter to exist. Now if you don't have the pure words of God, then you have no way to go to the Final Authority. If you don't have the Word of God, then you have NO CHURCH!!! If your so-called “church” uses multiple Bible versions, which all drastically disagree in meaning, then you have a big problem because you have more than one authority. Churches that use more than one Bible version have a two-headed monstrosity on their hands, because anything with two heads is a monster. God only wrote one Book! Please listen to the classic MP3 sermon by Dr. Jack Hyles titled, “LOGIC MUST PROVE THE KING JAMES BIBLE!!!” If we have no Bible, then we can only go to human wisdom and the collective human experience for knowledge. Bless God, the United States is the citadel of missionary outreach and world evangelization. It makes sense why God preserved His inspired words in the English language. Thank God for the King James Bible!!!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 34 Comments [7/24/2015 3:20:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 111051

Indeed!

“But at BioLogos, we do not see evolution as inherently atheistic."

Many Christians disagree. But, most, perhaps all, a-theists also disagree! Consider what the "pope" and "cardinals" of a-theism say about the implications of Darwinism - they clearly see it as demanding godlessness and moral relativism:

“In a universe of blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt, other people are going to get lucky, and you won’t find any rhyme or reason in it, or any justice. The universe that we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference… DNA neither knows nor cares. DNA just is. And we dance to its music.” (Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life (1995))

“Let me summarize my views on what modern evolutionary biology tells us loud and clear — and these are basically Darwin’s views. There are no gods, no purposes, and no goal-directed forces of any kind. There is no life after death. When I die, I am absolutely certain that I am going to be dead. That’s the end of me. There is no ultimate foundation for ethics, no ultimate meaning in life, and no free will for humans, either.” A-theist William Provine

“The position of the modern evolutionist is that humans have an awareness of morality because such an awareness of biological worth. Morality is a biological adaptation no less than are hands and feet and teeth. Considered as a rationally justifiable set of claims about an objective something, ethics is illusory. I appreciate when someone says, ‘Love thy neighbor as thyself,’ they think they are referring above and beyond themselves. Nevertheless, such reference is truly without foundation. Morality is just an aid to survival and reproduction, . . . and any deeper meaning is illusory.” (Michael Ruse, “Evolutionary Theory and Christian Ethics,” in The Darwinian Paradigm (London: Routledge, 1989), pp. 262-269).

Young earth versus old earth creationism is not the issue. Darwinism is. And I fail to see how it is even remotely compatible with ANY of Christian theology. And these a-theists seem to agree.

WorldGoneCrazy, Christian News Network 21 Comments [7/24/2015 3:19:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 111049

Dreher is saying that once you define what it means to be a human person in terms of the autonomous will, then the human body becomes an ancillary piece of existence which can and should be changed, forced upon or even mutilated so that it lines up with the inner self. The body becomes either a sacrosanct extension of personal identity or an errant clump of matter that distracts from your true self. What really matters is the personal will, the inner self-expression of identity; the body simply has to follow suit or get out of the way.

This lesson in metaphysics is helpful in understanding why many people who seemingly celebrate the apparent happiness and flourishing of life at any expense to moral norms also see no problem with the termination of unborn life when it is “inconvenient.” If the essence of humanness is what I feel, then it makes perfect sense for Caitlyn Jenner to say “This is who I really am” with no regard to biological reality. But then, if that is so, it also makes perfect sense to reason that an unborn fetus, which has no expressible inner will, but which does have a well-formed and beautiful body, should not be allowed to veto the self-determining will of anyone, much less the individual who would be “forced” to carry it to term.

Do you see what has happened here? The religion of personal autonomy has not just altered our morals or our social norms; it has radicalized our understanding of ourselves. Instead of being souls under the tender sovereignty of a Creator, with a body of His making, we now see ourselves as our own creation. How can that be, when we obviously don’t create ourselves? Well, we don’t create ourselves physically, but we do “create” ourselves in other ways, and if the physical body is not part of our true self–indeed, if it can actually be the opposite of our true self–then it doesn’t really count, and we really are self-created things.

Recently I was perusing the Twitter page of a progressive writer who identifies as bisexual and pro-choice. She wrote effusively in critique of a conservative evangelical blogger who had criticized her sexual ethics. Her main point was that her sexuality, her sexual identity, was not a debatable moral position. “My existence,” she wrote, “is not a moral argument.” In other words, this writer’s bisexuality wasn’t just self-evidently moral, it was actually beyond the purview of morals altogether; her sexual identity was her personhood, and her personhood did not require some sort of ethical justification.

What jarred me was that she then pivoted from this argument into a defense of Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry. She passionately argued that abortion on demand was morally fine and that any other reality was a viable threat on women’s health and freedom. It was one of the most astonishing feats of logical gymnastics I’d ever seen. Just moments after pleading that her personhood, expressed in her sexuality, was an objective fact and not subject to a philosophical examination, she openly denigrated the value of unborn life and subjugated its personhood to the self-determining will of adults.

This kind of radical cognitive dissonance can only survive on a steady diet of misnomers. Call it “transgenderism,” “genderfluid” or “becoming who I really am.” Call it “tissue,” “a clump of cells,” or “reproductive health.” Call it anything other than what is. A generation that is authentically seeking after truth does not have at arm’s reach a platoon of highly contemporary socio-psychological vocabulary. The sheer amount of effort that many put into obscuring reality suggests that we are running from our own conscience. We are not confident. We have to avoid the traps of honest language continually.

I’m reminded of what the demon Screwtape told his underling about temptation and language:

Your man has been accustomed, ever since he was a boy, to have a dozen incompatible philosophies dancing about together inside his head. He doesn’t think of doctrines as primarily “true” or “false,” but as “academic” or “practical,” “outworn” or “contemporary,” “conventional” or “ruthless.” Jargon, not argument, is your best ally in keeping him away from the Church. Don’t waste time trying to make him think materialism is true! Make him think it is strong, or stark, or courageous–that it is the philosophy of the future. That’s the sort of thing he cares about.

The illusion cannot last forever. Deborah Nucatola was giving us a wake up call. The arc of secularism is long but it bends toward profit, violence, and oppression.

Samuel James, Inklingations 18 Comments [7/24/2015 3:16:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: AJ Williams