Quote# 110587

lesbians are that way, not because they are born that way but because they are so ugly and fat they become a lezzy

Dean Saxton, Twitter 29 Comments [7/9/2015 3:21:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 110586

[fundie explains the Golden Rule]

Well that is NOT a christian belief. That is a secular idea which has nothing to do with christianity. Christianity says to love your neighbour as yourself and who is your neighbour? the bible says it is those who take care of your needs. I might not want to be punished if I do something wrong but that does not mean that it is wrong to punish me if I do in fact do something wrong. to think you should treat others as you want to be treated is a perversion of the gospel and grotesquely insulting to true christians.

Breakthrough, Y! answers 21 Comments [7/9/2015 3:21:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 110585

Starnes finds hope for the salvation of America in the Old Testament’s Book of Exodus, in which God sent a “swarm of hornets to clear the battlefield” for an outnumbered Israelite army. This story, argued Starnes, should be the “battle prayer of every patriot saint:” -

When the public schools tell students that our Founding Fathers were a bunch of terrorists: Send the hornets, Lord! Clear the field! When a teacher tells a little boy he can’t pray over his meal: Send the hornets, Lord! Clear that field! When the Pentagon tells them to take down a cross on a Christian chapel: Send those hornets! Clear the field! When the Supreme Court says they know better than God: Send the hornets, Lord! Clear the field! And, when the president says that America is no longer just a Christian nation: Don’t send the hornets, Lord. Send the mosquitoes and the gnats, and the bumblebees and the lightning bugs and the cicadas! Send every critter you got, Lord! Clear the field!”

Todd Starnes, right wing watch 21 Comments [7/9/2015 3:21:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Mister Spak

Quote# 110580

The godless have always tried to tame the Christians, but it's so sad to see the Christians being bullied by the sexual pervs in the Land of the Free and speaking and acting out the truth being made illegal again in the former Christendom. Non-believers will continue to try to bend the Christian conscience and subdue the Christians, being strengthened in doing more evil. Christians in the free nations must not submit to the Sodomists; liberty was won for submitting to God, not to the falsehood and human villains.

Grace Kim Kwon, Christian Post 12 Comments [7/9/2015 3:16:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 110579

Addictions are a perfect modern day example of how God forces us into sin. If temptation was always possible to resist, there would be no such thing as an addiction. Addicts are people who find themselves tormented by temptations which completely overwhelm them. Why is it one man can take or leave a glass of wine, while another man becomes chained to the bottle? Why is one man able to push a pornographic image out of his mind while another man can’t rest until he sees more? The answer is God. Self-control is a fruit of the Spirit and each one of us experiences a different level of it in each situation that we’re in. I might successfully resist 1,000 temptations only to find myself totally conquered by the next one that comes along. It’s so easy to judge those who get hooked on things we’re not personally tempted by, but the reality is that God is the only reason any of us can avoid sinning.

If you honestly examine your own life, you’ll find copious examples of God shoving you into sin by refusing to give you what you needed to resist it. And let’s remember it was God who cursed the world in the first place and He was the One who decided how sin would affect us. It was God who saddled each of us with this carnal shell which constantly lusts after evil. We can’t deny His responsibility in this for we didn’t create ourselves, He did. Babies don’t choose evil—they are born into it. Evil is what comes naturally to us, not righteousness. No one has to teach us how to lie or steal or be selfish and demanding. But we must be disciplined in order to learn how to be kind, patient, and polite. Righteousness is a struggle while evil is automatic—this is God’s doing, not ours. This is how He wants it to be.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 21 Comments [7/9/2015 3:07:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 110578

The other nations have not made a covenant with Him, like our founders did in the Declaration of Independence, appealing to God for deliverance and independence. We should not be surprised when God revokes that covenant and lifts His hand of protection. The founder were very clear in their writings and speeches that this nation would collapse if it ever stopped following God. .

Maunalani, Christian Post 14 Comments [7/9/2015 3:07:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 110577

In the Bible, who is it that God is using to stomp all over His rebellious people? Bloodthirsty creeps like the Assyrians and Babylonians. These were merciless men who got off on torturing people, degrading women, and killing children while they violently took over the territory of less powerful nations. Sound familiar? Who do you think is really behind all this ISIS activity that we’re constantly hearing about in the news? The Church tells you it’s demons. God says it’s Him. God says that NOTHING happens in this world that He doesn’t WANT to happen. Yet when we read about people being forced to dig their own mass graves, women being raped and children being forced to play the role of suicide bombers, are we willing to see God at work? No, we’re not. We run screaming into denial, gladly exalting Satan as the “ruler of this world” so that we can avoid acknowledging what God Himself says about His own sovereignty. And while we hide out in a web of comforting lies, how is God responding to us? He’s getting angrier and angrier. What is it that ignites God’s wrath against us? Soul rebellion. What are we doing when we blatantly deny God’s sovereignty over all things, His involvement with evil, and His supremacy over demons? We’re rebelling. What are we doing when we intentionally avoid reading the Old Testament because we don’t want to be confronted with records of how Yahweh has done THESE SAME THINGS to people many times in the past? We’re rebelling. What are we doing when we try avoid the prophetic books in which Yahweh announces that HE is the true Source of all misery in this world? We’re rebelling. What makes God mad at us? Rebellion. See the problem? Christians are in for a major spanking during the end times. It’s not going to be some human antichrist with his hordes of brainwashed soldiers that we’re going to be up against. It’s going to be our own God doling out the discipline, and He’s going to be choosing many Christian targets to nail with His destructive power. He is going to be mad at US because WE are the ones who are WILLFULLY DEFYING Him today, and we’ve been defying Him for decades by refusing to believe what He says about the way things really work.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 14 Comments [7/9/2015 3:07:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 110575

When Jesus Christ returns to set up his world-wide theocracy at the end of the Great Tribulation, he will dismiss the scotus, the US Constitution, all federal, state and local laws, and put His law in practice. No more ssm, no more abortion, no more legal divorce, no more homosexuals, no more adultery that does not carry a death sentence. Lots of changes coming, and it won't be long until they arrive.

Gary Bryson, Christian Post 25 Comments [7/9/2015 3:06:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 110574

I heard a Calvary Chapel pastor say that the Klines in Oregon were WRONG to turn away a wedding cake order for the lesbians. He said he would have wanted them to "witness" to the lesbians by making a "wedding" cake for their perverted, God-blaspheming union. Later, he said that his congregation would not allow the property to be used for weddings for other than Calvary Chapel members because otherwise they would have to let everyone else use the premises. I had to scratch my head. Didn't he just state the opposite of this?

There seems to be no understanding that this is an ABOMINATION that no Christian can take part in.

Thisoldspouse, BarbWire 10 Comments [7/9/2015 3:05:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 110573

Claiming that cultural Marxism is a conspiracy theory is the left-wing equivalent of Holocaust denial. Worse, in fact.

[Second Tweet]

The Holocaust killed six million Jews. Marxism killed over a hundred million people, and is STILL killing people today.

Matt Forney, Twitter 57 Comments [7/8/2015 3:32:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 24

Quote# 110571

(This is a part of an essay calling for all predatory animals to killed off or genetically engineered into herbivores to end all suffering in the biosphere.)

More controversial than the case of tapeworms, cockroaches or locusts would be reprogramming or phasing out snakes and crocodiles. Snakes and crocodiles cause innumerable hideous deaths in the world each day. They are also part of our familiar conceptual landscape thanks to movies, zoos, TV documentaries, and the like - though a relaxed tolerance of their activities is easier in the comfortable West than for, say, a grieving Indian mother who has lost her child to a snakebite. Snakes are responsible for over 50,000 human deaths each year.

Most controversial of all, however, would be the extinction - or genetically-driven behavioural modification - of members of the cat family. We'll focus here on felines rather than the "easy" cases like parasitic tapeworms or cockroaches because of the unique status of members of the cat family in contemporary human culture, both as pets/companion animals and as our romanticised emblems of "wildlife". Most contemporary humans have a strong aesthetic preference in favour of continued feline survival. Their existence in current guise is perhaps the biggest ethical/ideological challenge to the radical abolitionist. For our culture glorifies lions, with their iconic status as the King of the Beasts; we admire the grace and agility of a cheetah; the tiger is a symbol of strength, beauty and controlled aggression; the panther is dark, swift and elegant; and so forth. Innumerable companies and sports teams have enlisted one or other of the big cats for their logos as symbols of manliness and vigour. Moreover cats of the domestic variety are the archetypal household pets. The worldwide domestic cat population has been estimated at around 400 million. We romanticise their virtues and forgive their foibles, notably their playful torment of mice. Indeed rather than being an object of horror - and compassion for the mouse - the torment of mice has been turned into stylized entertainment. Hence Tom-and-Jerry cartoons. By contrast, talk of "eliminating" predation can sound sinister. What would "phasing out" or "reprogramming" predators mean in practice? Most disturbingly, such terms are evocative of genocide, not universal compassion.

Appearances deceive. To get a conceptual handle on what is really going on during "predation", let's compare our attitude to the fate of a pig or a zebra with the fate of an organism with whom those non-human animals are functionally equivalent, both intellectually and in their capacity to suffer, namely a human toddler. On those rare occasions when a domestic dog kills a baby or toddler, the attack is front-page news. The offending dog is subsequently put down. Likewise, lions in Africa who turn man-eater are tracked down and killed, regardless of their conserved status. This response isn't to imply lions - or for that matter rogue dogs - are morally culpable. But by common consent they must be prevented from killing any more human beings. By contrast, the spectacle of a lion chasing a terrified zebra and then asphyxiating its victim can be shown on TV as evening entertainment, edifying viewing even for children. How is this parallel relevant? Well, if our theory of value aspires to a God's-eye perspective, stripped of unwarranted anthropocentric bias in the manner of the physical sciences, then the well-being of a pig or a zebra inherently matters no less than the fate of a human baby - or any other organism endowed with an equivalent degree of sentience. If we are morally consistent, then as we acquire God-like powers over Nature's creatures, we should take analogous steps to secure their well-being too. Given our anthropocentric bias, thinking of non-human vertebrates not just as equivalent in moral status to toddlers or infants, but as though they were toddlers or infants, is a useful exercise. Such reconceptualisation helps correct our lack of empathy for sentient beings whose physical appearance is different from "us". Ethically, the practice of intelligent "anthropomorphism" shouldn't be shunned as unscientific, but embraced insofar as it augments our stunted capacity for empathy. Such anthropomorphism can be a valuable corrective to our cognitive and moral limitations. This is not a plea to be sentimental, simply for impartial benevolence. Nor is it even a plea to take "sides" between killer and prey. Human serial killers who prey on other humans need to be locked up. But ultimately, it's vindictive morally to blame them in any ultimate sense for the fate of their victims. Their behaviour supervenes on the fundamental laws of physics. Tout comprendre, c'est tout pardonner. Yet this indulgence doesn't extend to permitting them to kill again; and the abolitionist maintains the same principle holds good for nonhuman serial killers too.

David Pearce, Abolitionist Project 50 Comments [7/8/2015 3:31:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 38
Submitted By: skybison

Quote# 110569

The consequences of the Supreme Court marriage ruling

Once jurists who believe the U.S.
Constitution is a “living document “open to any relevant interpretation were
appointed as lifetime members of the Supreme Court the Constitution became
political fair game.

And once Americans accepted as the
law of the land that those justices ruled, the country would never be the same.

No longer would there be three
branches of government each having responsibility in a specific role –
executive, legislative, judicial review. Instead there would be one person
making all decisions. (The Elite).

If there was any doubt we had
reached that tipping point before, Friday’s incoherent, emotional, irrational,
reactionary decision on marriage it should put it to rest.

This was not a legal decision. It
was a political edict by five men and women in the Supreme Court who really believe in their “supremacy, “and
are quite willing to rubber stamp Obama and his cronies socialist NWO political
objectives).

They the elite believe they are
wiser than God who created the institution of marriage, a union of a man and a
woman and are quite willing to force their views on you.

Where does this lead?

Polygamy?

Polyandry?

Incest?

Indoctrination of the people?

But it’s all good, according to
Anthony Kennedy and company.

It’s about liberty without
responsibility. Or in short, (anything goes).

Does Kennedy understanding of
liberty apart from God’s moral code brings on horrors like were experienced
during the fall of Rome, the French Revolution and Sodom and Gomorrah?

Does he understand the role marriage
and family play in self-governance?

Does he have any idea of the kind of
world he has ensured for our children?

Nothing is certain. There are no
absolutes. Nothing is foreordained as right or wrong everything becomes
relevant. It’s all just a matter of personal opinion. Lawlessness without
conscience.

The rule of law means what they say
it means. The will of the people means nothing. The people will follow the
dictates of the elite leadership who know better. (Or else)

America was morally adrift long
before this ruling. This is the fast-track version of moral relativism as
national political, legal, educational and cultural policy.

It also serves to divide the
citizenry more sharply than any other ruling from on high. No less than a
strategy of divide and Conquer.

We have already seen this same-sex
marriage issue used, including by this same court, to portray anyone who
dissents from the redefining of marriage as a bigot, a hater, a maladjusted
rogue, an enemy of the people. And you quickly become the enemy of the people if
you are in disagreement with them, potentially being classified a terrorist.

Think about it. It’s now open season
on people of faith – Christians, Jews, anyone who holds marriage to be a sacred
institution. No more division of State and Church. License all ministers.
Require all sermons be submitted for perusal by the government before being
preached. A one world church governed by the elites in a utopia socialist NWO.

We are living in perilous times.

There will be consequences for this
decision. Don’t expect everyone to put aside their most deeply held religious
convictions and live happily looking for a utopian socialistic NWO.

Don’t expect the liberal cultural anarchists (anti
christ’s) who put this movement in place just a decade ago to stop here. This
is the beginning of their revolution, not the endgame. As time goes on it will
be about no less than world control.

As a Christian, I also believe we
will be hearing from our God Jehovah the author of marriage (soon).

America’s elite leadership has taken
the side of the enemies of God, and He will take notice even as He took notice
of past nations and Sodom and Gomorrah.

It could come in the form of an
economic crash. It could come in more civil and racial strife as has been seen
in recent days. It could come in the form of an attack on our country from
foreign power or terrorist group. Or it could come from an internal collapse as
a result of moral decay as happen in Rome.

Tribulations are just the pattern
that God uses to bring His people to repentance for their own good.

Read the Bible, the end days are no
longer future they are here.

2Chronicles 7:13 If I shut up heaven that there
be no rain, or if I command the locusts to devour the land, or if I send
pestilence among my people;

2Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called
by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from
their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin,
and will heal their land.

James, Christian News Network 33 Comments [7/8/2015 3:31:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 110568

if 5 lawyers can rule 320 million americans by a decree, the USA is no longer the land of the free.

70 % americans say they are christian, then add the jews , muslims, sikhs , and you have the majority in favor of traditional marriage.

this contention has been going on for decades on how to balance the freedoms of Christians and lgbt . the judges stayed out of the dictator decree until liberal california voted in favor for traditional marriage, one gay judge over turned the votes of californians , Prop 8 , which at first christians won and then the victory was taken away by one judge. this was a harbinger of things to come for what happened in california was about the happen nation wide.

now the supreme court did the same thing against the will of the people. supreme judge roberts cast the deciding vote and he admitted that when the lgbt celebrates they should remember that the vote was not based on the constitution, in other words he did it for the gays not for the constitution. again one judge had the deciding rule over 320 million americans.

are the judges told to uphold the constitution? first california judge, now the supremes , now they are coming for more blood for tax exempt removal. after that they will come for the Bible. they will demand the Bible be banned.

so what will you do about that? can the usa remove those judges? are there any politicians running for president that will stand for traditional marriage? if you dont repent from your sins then you will suffer as your country goes down the toilet. america is suffering due to its sin.

Miley you say only God can judge you (no she did not parrot a rap star) dont worry , He will judge you. God allows people to make their choice of sin and rebellion , just like the devil did, or obedience to His word...like Jesus Gods Son did.

follow the devil or Jesus, the devil will end up in hell for eternal torment in fire.
Jesus is glorified in a perfect heaven. so what ending will you choose? but i dont believe Gods word anymore..."the the devil said to Eve 'did God really say do not eat of any tree'? ....is Gods word really true , surely it cant be with so many translations.

if you base your eternity on party friends comments then you are in sad shape. i have studied the history of the Bible , the scrolls , textus receptus, codex sanaiticus etc and the King James Bible is accurate.

Good thing the other ones are close even as the devil tried to change Gods word but his attempt failed. they all say the same thing except the King James is the best translation when i look at manuscript and scroll evidence . the recent find of the dead sea scrolls prove the Bible is accurate for almost one thousand years after finding other scrolls and parchments and in a total different part of the word, the texts say the same thing. amazing.

miley = straying Christians who have left the faith

david, Christian News Network 29 Comments [7/8/2015 3:31:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 110567

You stood quiet and you let ONE couple lead the charge.
And you lost the ability to let your child pray in school if they wanted to.

You stood quiet and let a handful of people lead the charge.
And you lost the ability to have the 10 commandments displayed where they had been since the INCEPTION of this country.

You stood quiet and let the minority bully bakers and pizzerias into bankruptcy because they didn't want to compromise their personal beliefs.
And you lost the ability to run a Christian business in a Godly way.

You stood quiet and let FIVE judges kick down the doors of the church (as well as every other religious institution) and STEAL a RELIGIOUS ceremony and corrupt it before God.

Will you also stand quiet now? While these wolves seek to go for the jugular? Do you have any idea how many Christian churches, non-profits and schools will collapse if they lose their tax exemption status?

You stand quiet, and now a few of them, emboldened by all the ways a few of them were able to kick around Christians, are going for the jugular.

It went from simple prayer in a classroom, to them standing at the door calling for the collapse of your church.

This isn't about "love". This is a bunch of jackboot dictators trying to force their dogma on the opposition or see it destroyed. Tax exemption has nothing to do with these people going to a church, or chapel, or justice of the peace and getting married.

They are coming for you now.

What are you going to do about it?

Someone here said it's just "two activists". Two is all it ever took to lose everything you have thus far.

I promise you, look throughout history, not just Christianity, but across other religions, political belief systems, theologies, etc... Whenever one side got the government to turn on the other, the other was surpressed and persecuted.

You think it can't happen in America, but if you don't do something NOW, preaching the Gospel will be considered giving a terroristic hate speech and you will be thrown in jail for it.

Seems unrealistic?

Ask your grandpas if they'd ever see the day that a pastor may have to marry two men on his altar or risk losing his church.

You better rise.

Derringer Duo, Christian News Network 24 Comments [7/8/2015 3:31:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 110564

As expected, SCOTUS today declared a constitutional right to “gay marriage” by judicial fiat. I haven’t read the ruling and may not ever do so since it really doesn’t matter what its reasoning is. The decision is illegitimate on its face because Justices Ginsberg and Kagan were disqualified from voting under the fundamental rules of judicial ethics because they each performed same sex “weddings” during the period of deliberations when the parties were legally entitled to impartiality by the jurists.

In response to the ruling, Mr. Obama called it an example of “justice that arrives like a thunderbolt.” That phrase turns logic and morality on its head as it relates to official government endorsement of sexual perversion. But I suspect it will eventually, perhaps very soon, be recognized in retrospect as an unwitting prophecy about God’s punishment on America for what she has just done.

###

12:30pm I just received an email from my ex-‘gay’ friend Greg Quinlan informing me that today’s “gay marriage” ruling happens to fall on the anniversary of the fall of Jerusalem and the Kingdom of Judah in 586BC to Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzer: the ninth day of the fourth month of the Hebrew calendar.

“Coincidentally,” in our daily chapter by chapter Bible study at Holy Grounds Coffee House that we began in Genesis more than two years ago, we arrived today at Jeremiah 39, which reads in verse 2: 2And on the ninth day of the fourth month of Zedekiah’s eleventh year, the city wall was broken through.

Amazing.

Scott Lively, Scott Lively Ministries 15 Comments [7/8/2015 3:30:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 110563

..-You are invited to the "wedding." Be sure to bring a gift appropriate for Judicial TYRANTS. (Suggestion: Get some of that NAZI memorabilia still being sold by all those leftist stores that banned the Confederate flag.)



MicahStone, Gateway Pundit 23 Comments [7/8/2015 3:28:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 110561

(Cadiz, KY) On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Kentucky’s law defining marriage as between one man and one woman. “This is a sad day for the rule of law and the democratic process,” said Commonwealth Policy Center Executive Director Richard Nelson. “Over 51 million voters amended 31 state constitutions to recognize man/woman marriage and today five judges said ‘we know better.’”

The 5-4 ruling holds that homosexual couples have a fundamental right to marry and that existing state marriage laws are unconstitutional. “As much as the Court desired to settle this question, utter disregard for the voters and ongoing debate over this issue neither eased tensions nor settled this question,” Nelson said. “This ruling creates a cultural rift as deep as the infamous Roe v. Wade ruling 42 years ago. But the debate will continue.”

“Man/woman marriage is the most fundamental and most important of human relationships. It is a pillar of society,” Nelson said. “When a pillar is weakened or altered, you weaken society in ways not immediately seen or felt.” Nelson predicts fallout for organizations holding to man/woman marriage.

He says Kentuckians can expect accreditation of orthodox Christian and Jewish schools to eventually be revoked, federal student loans at religious schools will end, faith-based adoption agencies like Sunrise Children’s Services will be forced out of business and Christian business owners, particularly those who cater to the wedding industry, will be sued for discrimination.

“If the Court can radically alter a definition embraced by society for millenia, it will insist that other institutions align themselves with the new dictate immediately,” Nelson said.

Nelson says that now is not time for panic or to retreat from the marriage issue. Rather, he encourages people of goodwill to overcome the judicial fiat to redefine the truth of marriage by boldly rejecting relativism and embodying and modeling truth in everyday life.

Richard Nelson, Commonwealth Policy Center 11 Comments [7/8/2015 3:28:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: documentingtehcrazy

Quote# 110560

Homosexuality and transgenderism lifestyle are now being taught as completely normal, and discourse on their validity is becoming increasingly difficult. The Lexington Herald-Leader recently featured an article on J'Lissabeth Faughn, a Lexington-based “transgender educator and social activist.” She offers programs such as “Unlearning Homophobia” and “Beyond Diversity Toward Inclusion” to schools and businesses. The article praises Faughn's attempts to make the LGBT lifestyle more acceptable, but it offers no flip side to such efforts, such as religious, scientific, or social beliefs. It also mentions “vitriolic backlash” against Bruce Jenner's recent photo on the cover of Vanity Fair, but does nothing to acknowledge rational arguments against such displays. Activists such as Faughn preach tolerance and understanding while marginalizing those who disagree with them. If the sexual revolutionaries truly want to foster peace, they should realize there are two sides to every argument.

Eddie Sheridan, Commonwealth Policy Center 14 Comments [7/8/2015 3:28:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: documentingtehcrazy

Quote# 110558

Robert Rankin Doggart, a former candidate for Congress, admitted in federal court to “plotting the annihilation” of a village in New York that is home to many Muslims. Doggart’s plans included “burning down a school, a mosque and a cafeteria,” according to the criminal complaint.

“We’re gonna be carrying an M4 with 500 rounds of ammunition, light armor piercing. A pistol with three extra magazines, and a machete. And if it gets down to the machete, we will cut them to shreds,” Doggart allegedly said according to the transcript of a wiretap cited in the complaint. He also allegedly tried to recruit other individuals to participate in his plot through a Facebook group.

As part of a plea agreement, Doggart pled guilty to “interstate communication of threats” and faces up to five years in prison. He was in jail awaiting final sentencing.

But a federal judge, Curtis Collier, may not accept the guilty plea. He’s ordered the prosecution and defense to produce briefs proving that Doggart was a “true threat.” Meanwhile, a different federal judge, Magistrate Susan K. Lee, released Doggart from jail “into the custody of two family members.”

Lee had previously found that Doggart was a “danger to the community.” The government appealed the decision to release Doggart to Judge Collier, who affirmed Lee’s decision.

Doggart’s release has drawn criticism from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a Muslim advocacy group. “It is deeply troubling that an individual who has admitted to planning a religiously-motivated terror attack on American Muslims is now free, while the intended targets of his plot remain unprotected,” CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad said in a statement. CAIR had previously criticized the prosecutor’s decision not to treat Doggart’s conduct “as an act of terrorism and to charge the alleged organizer of the attack as a terrorist.”

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center — and academics studying the issue — the United States has focused on combating Islamic extremism but given short shrift to other threats like domestic attacks by right-wing radicals. Since 9/11, “more people have been killed in America by non-Islamic domestic terrorists than jihadists.”

Robert Rankin Doggart and Curtis Collier, Thinkprogress 16 Comments [7/8/2015 3:25:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 110557

[From a sarcastic article titled "My Open Letter of Apology to the Gay Community (From a Christian)"]

1. I’m sorry that any of us ever referred to you as a “gay community.” Really, that’s not helpful. A “community” is a group of individuals that either live in the same place or share the same values. Sodomy (defined as unnatural and immoral sexual behavior) is not a value. Sodomy is a deviancy. Now, if you defined “community” as sharing interests and not values, then there could theoretically be a gay community because you hold unnatural and immoral sexual behavior as a common interest. However, to call you a “community” would legitimize this sin in a way that we don’t legitimize any other sin. For example, we don’t recognize “the thieving community” or the “the lying community” or “the bank-robbing community” or “the rapist community” or the “white collar criminal community.” If communities could be founded upon self-destructive behavior, those communities would be self-defeating, and a self-defeating community is no community at all. In fact, a truly “gay community” would be extinct within one generation. Your unnatural sexual deviancy leads to death; legitimate communities are self-populating and regenerative. It was a dumb term for Christians to start using, and I apologize for all of those who inadvertently give credence to the narrative that yours is a community and not a group of sinners who share in community-destroying behavior.

JD Hall, Pulpit & Pen 21 Comments [7/8/2015 3:25:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 110555

Some hundred years ago one could not argue against “the word of God”. If it was in the bible, everybody simply had to believe in it, and arguing against it was if not always a physical suicide, then at least very dangerous, and the risk of being octracized was huge. Ridicule was certain. Scorn was certain. Persecution was certain.

Today science is “the new word of God”, and perhaps especially so DNA. If its in the DNA and the scientists (the new priests) can interpret it for us this or that way, then we can not argue against it. If a DNA sample e. g. proved to you that you were white, when you in reality were black, it would be hard for you to convince your fellow human beings that you were in fact black. I mean; how can you argue against DNA? When science talks, we often close our eyes to reality, and instead just accept what the scientists say.

When the Max Planck institute started their Neanderthal Genome Project, they took DNA from two different already mixed (with Homo sapiens) Neanderthals from Vindija in Croatia, and since they did not have a complete DNA, they added something from another (also mixed, with Denisova [an Asian species]) Neanderthal from Mezmaiskya in Russia. So the DNA they had was not from one individual, it was not from a Neanderthal at all, but from several mixed Neanderthal/Homo Sapiens/Denisova individuals, and as if that wasn’t enough: the DNA was not complete.

They did not take DNA samples from any pure Neanderthals, nor from any of the many Neanderthals in Central or Western Europe. Why not?!

Then they took DNA from several modern human beings, and compared it to the DNA of the (remember: mixed) Neanderthals they had taken samples from.

The modern humans they took DNA from were surprisingly not Europeans, save one from France. We know nothing about this Frenchman either.

So when we know the Neanderthals were blue-eyed, blond and very light skinned, why did they not take samples from a population with mainly such features, such as the Scandinavians, the Germans, the Dutch or the English? Why not?!

Not surprisingly, some of the Asians seemingly came out with the most Neanderthal DNA. Well, why would they not, when the scientists had added DNA from a Neanderthal mixed with an Asian species?! We don’t know how mixed it was either. For all we know it was a half-Neanderthal, half-Denisovan, with 50% of its DNA from Denisova.

Why would some of the Asians not have the most Neanderthal DNA, when they had – amazingly – not compared it to a European with Neanderthal features such as blond hair, blue-eyes and very light skin?! How convenient, to leave out the absolutely most Neanderthal-looking modern men from the research!

And tell me: what kind of ‘science’ is that?!

And tell me: do you trust DNA tests and what these priests tell us about DNA when you know this?

They don’t enlighten us; they sink us further into darkness. They don’t illuminate our world with scientific truth; they produce smoke screens and illusions.

I am tired of this. Not a month passes by, without somebody sending me a link to some ‘scientific’ journal who apparently argue against what I say. They don’t actually, but some times it seems as if they do, because – after all – all they produce are smoke screens and illusions, hiding the truth.

If you wish to learn the truth, use your head instead. If it makes sense, it is probably true. If it doesn’t make sense it probably isn’t true – such as the theory that Europeans still in posession of all the recessive traits of the Neanderthals are not mainly Neanderthals!

We are. We still are Neanderthals.

Don’t let these priests ruin your faith in your origin. Don’t let them break down your own identify. Don’t trust “the word of God”.

Varg Vikernes, Thulean Perspective 22 Comments [7/8/2015 3:23:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: What?

Quote# 110554

The Power of Names — Our Definitions

Dyke: We use this term for the most Lesbian-identified of Lesbians. It’s important to remember that it was originally used only for Butches.

Lesbian: A female who loves and falls in love with other females, makes love only with females, and never relates sexually to males or injects semen into herself. When Lesbians are single and celibate, we’re very different from celibate het women, who are still sexually, emotionally, socially, and culturally focused on men.

Lesbianism is far more than a “sexual preference” or “sexual orientation.” It is a choice of women loving women. Everything we feel and do in our lives we do as Lesbians. Our political and creative work is Lesbian. Our friendships are Lesbian relationships.

No male can become a Lesbian. “Transwomen” are simply men perving, fetishizing, and caricaturing women and Lesbians.

Female: The term we use for our sex, since it’s not age-specific and is less identified with heterosexuality than “woman.” Also, it’s a reminder of our link with other female animals on earth, who are generally called “female,” rather than “women.” And, as Julia Penelope said in The Mystery of Lesbians, “female” is derived from the French “femelle,” with no connection to the word “male,” while (crediting the writings of Monique Wittig and ideas of Ariane Brunet and Louise Turcotte) “woman” comes from “wif” (wife) and “man.”

Woman, Womyn, Wimmin, etc.: For many of us, “woman” has meant heterosexual — a “real” woman by men’s standards. It’s a male definition imposed on females and isn’t our natural state. The many feminist variations are closet terms for “Lesbian,” and we refuse to support that trend. When we say “Lesbian,” we mean it. It’s understandable that Lesbians in unsafe situations use a code name like “womyn” to make contact with other Lesbians, but when Lesbians use those terms instead of “Dyke” or “Lesbian” among ourselves, it weakens Lesbian identity. “The womyn’s community” is het-identified, not Lesbian-identified.

Some Lesbians embraced “woman” because that term is denied to many females, especially Lesbians. Men call us “girls” to demean us. However, some Lesbians prefer the term “girl” to “woman” for other reasons. For some African-descent females, poor and working-class females, Lesbians who came out before the Women’s Liberation Movement, and young females, “girl” is a familiar, affectionate term. After all, we’ve all been girls for a long time, while “woman” is a term laden with images of “adult” females who are heterosexually active, wifely, and motherly. For many of us, girlhood was the time when many girls we knew were most clear about loving other girls and rejecting boys. We support girls who call themselves “girls” as a statement of pride, and we support adult females who call themselves “girls” as part of their culture and heritage.

We also don’t call ourselves Gay women since that associates us with Gay men. That term has been a dividing line between Lesbian Feminists and non-feminists or Lesbians who felt afraid to use the term Lesbian.

Bev Jo, Linda Strega and Ruston, Bev Jo 22 Comments [7/8/2015 3:21:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: What?

Quote# 110552

Actually, Bill Nye got his START on a local Seattle comedy show called “ALMOST LIVE!” back in the 80s. He was just another local comedian who happened to have an interest in science. I don’t know if he has any actual college degrees (other than Liberal Arts Degrees, which are as useless as a Democrat at voting time) but he IS a reasonable funny man. A little brain-dead from drinking too much Kool-Aid, but still funny in his own way.
I used to enjoy letting my kids learn about how things work by watching his Science Guy show. It helped them form an intelligent grasp of the world around us. But when Nye started doing his “Praise Lord Obozo” act it really pissed me off. Polluting OUR air so he can ride in a fucking plane with his savior, Barry the Blameless just shows what a typical Libtard Nye really is… it’s OK for THEM to have a gazillion-ton carbon footprint but the REST OF US need to drive Prius’ and ride bikes and only eat FMO FOODS so we can save the planet. Never mind what they DO… just do as they SAY! Libtardian douchebags!!!!!

Bandini, The Federalist Papers 13 Comments [7/8/2015 3:20:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 110551

Daniel, I have a Masters of Aerospace Engineering and completed all my coursework toward a PhD in AE. I worked for 35 years in atmospherics, mathematical modeling, and dynamic systems. Nye has the request background in advanced mathematics to look into the legitimacy of the models but obviously hasn’t done so.

The vast majority of the climate models are built on a fundamental flaw in the assumptions used to solve the system equations. It is the reason so much effort is going into “refining” data beyond recognition – about as big an affront to the scientific method that could be devised.

As for the 96% number, it came from a howlingly misleading news report that misused about every statistical principle in the book. You really need to investigate the information that is being parroted.

BTW, show me a climatologist researching global warming and I’ll show you someone whose entire livelihood depends keeping the studies going.

John G, The Federalist Papers 14 Comments [7/8/2015 3:20:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 110550

Is ISIS an option to INCELS?

If you rape a feminist in a western society, you're after 20 years more jail time. Feminism starts with christianism, Jesus was too mangina to give the cheating slut what she really deserves. Now its time to replace that shit for some alpha religion where women are in their proper place. And remember, there are no inocents. Soon or later, leftists will be hunting and murdering incels.

We will die like everyone, we are talking here to a chance of die like a real man. Die in a war. What christianism is doing for incels? nothing. We were good all our lifes, to see what? niggers and obnixious man fucking hot women when sluts doesnt give a shit about us. This christian jew god sucks.

psycl0n, Reddit /r/PhilosophyOfRape 53 Comments [7/8/2015 3:20:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 25
Submitted By: Ultimate Paragon