Quote# 107635

This sadistic story [The Hunger Games] with pornographic overtones depicts teens who are tortured and killed in rituals like those the Illuminati use to trauma brainwash their own children. In occult, gender-bending fashion, a young woman performs the pugilistic feats required to defend her family.

The Illuminati media is the Church of Satan. We are the congregation, unconscious of this relentless, sinister assault on our psyches.

Henry Makow, HenryMakow.com 33 Comments [4/6/2015 3:36:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 25

Quote# 107634

The Supreme Court is slated to rule on the subject of same-sex "marriage" this term. Here are four questions I want to ask same-sex marriage supporters:

1) If the Supreme Court says that it is okay for a man to marry a man and a woman to marry a woman, then how can they stop there?

Once they open Pandora's Box, how can they say that polygamy is unconstitutional? [...] If the Supreme Court rules to "redefine" marriage beyond one man-one woman, then how can they say a man can't marry his sister, or a mother her son, or a man and his dog, or two men and one woman? How can they legally draw a line? Proponents of same-sex marriage howl at such questions, but three men just "married" in Thailand the other day.

2) How do you prevent legalizing same-sex marriage from erasing religious liberty?

[...]

Could you imagine the uproar if the government tried to force an African-American printer to use his artistic skills and shop to produce fliers for a KKK rally, despite his objections because of his conscience?

Legalizing same-sex marriage effectively makes those who hold to traditional values second class citizens, especially when the forces of "tolerance" insist on hauling anyone who disagrees into court.

[...]

3) How do you deal with the fact that homosexuality is not immutable?

For the record, there are thousands of Americans alive today who are former homosexuals and former lesbians - freed from their sin by Jesus. [...] And there are many ex-gays who have changed through psychological means, unrelated to religion.

Being homosexual is not an immutable trait. Indeed, even those who argue for the alphabet soup of genders we are now expected to recognize often tell us that sexuality is "fluid." When you involve marriage, you are involving the law - marriage codifies a relationship into law. But what if someone is gay one day and not the next? Sexual anarchy leads to legal anarchy.

4) Why are the voters of this country so marginalized?

In a recent interview I did with Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, he notes that even though same-sex marriage is now legal in some 37 states, only in three of those states was it voted in by the people. In two of them, it was voted by the legislatures, the people's representatives. With the rest of the states, it only became legal by judicial fiat. [...] Should we change the Constitution from "We the people" to "We the judges"?

[...]

In short, I oppose same-sex "marriage" because I am in favor of freedom - freedom guaranteed in the Constitution.

Jerry Newcombe, Barb Wire 32 Comments [4/6/2015 3:36:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 107633

Smoking is legal but lethal. So is homosexuality.

Homosexuality is only legal in the United States because of an act of judicial tyranny committed by the Supreme Court in 2003, in which the Court imposed its view of sexual morality on the entire nation, something these same enlightened folk are always telling us should never be done by anyone to anybody at any time. At any rate, homosexuality is "legal," just like cigarette smoking. And it's just as deadly.

Our public policies toward both behaviors and habits should be similar if not the same. For instance, with regard to our youth, at a minimum we should educate them about the enormous health risks involved in both smoking and homosexuality, urge them not to dabble in either form of behavior, and provide resource to help them quit if they start.

We should not allow pro-homosexual student clubs on middle school and high school campuses any more than we would allow smoking clubs on school grounds.

[...]

Do we want to discourage young men and women from developing a smoking habit because hate them? Just the opposite. We love them and don't want to see tobacco deprive them of their health and their very lives.

Do we want to discourage young men and women from developing a homosexual habit beceause we hate them? Just the opposite. We love them and don't want to see homosexuality deprive them of their health and their very lives.

[...]

We want them to learn they don't have to yield to homosexual impulses any more than they have to yield to the impulse to light up.

Let the conversation begin.

Bryan Fischer, American Family Association 27 Comments [4/6/2015 3:36:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 107632

Yoga classes do not violate students' religious rights, Californian court rules
Appeals court upholds ruling against lawsuit brought by family who claimed yoga promoted Hinduism and inhibited Christianity.
Yoga taught in a public school is not a gateway to Hinduism and does not violate the religious rights of students or their parents, a California appeals court has ruled.

An appeal court in San Diego upheld a lower court ruling that tossed out a family’s lawsuit that tried to block Encinitas Union school district from teaching yoga as an alternative to traditional gym classes.

“While the practice of yoga may be religious in some contexts, yoga classes as taught in the district are, as the trial court determined, ‘devoid of any religious, mystical, or spiritual trappings,’” the court wrote in a 3-0 opinion.
Stephen and Jennifer Sedlock and their two children had brought the lawsuit claiming yoga promoted Hinduism and inhibited Christianity. They were disappointed with the ruling and considering their options.

“No other court in the past 50 years has allowed public school officials to lead children in formal religious rituals like the Hindu liturgy of praying to, bowing to, and worshipping the sun god,” attorney Dean Broyles said in a statement.

Paul V Carelli IV, a lawyer for the district, said there were no rituals occurring in the classroom and no one was worshipping the sun or leading Hindu rites. The district said the practice was taught in a secular way to promote strength, flexibility and balance.

Yoga is now taught at schools across the US, but the district is believed to be the first with full-time yoga teachers at all schools.

A three-year grant from the KP Jois Foundation, a nonprofit group that promotes Ashtanga yoga, provides twice-weekly, 30-minute classes to the district’s 5,600 students.

About 30 families opted out of the classes begun in 2011.

Stephen and Jennifer Sedlock, theguardian.com 18 Comments [4/6/2015 3:36:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 107631

First, I didn’t know the situation in Australia had devolved to a point that anyone actually feared introduction to Sharia. Australia is a civilized, modern nation-state; I suggest developing their own nuclear arsenal. I’m sure Israel will help with their technology.
Indeed multiculturalism is racist in the sense that multiculturalist uniformly hate white people. I don’t know the reference to VD; however, sure some traits are inherited, but don’t generalize this to racial traits. I am descended from Scots, and I have the Y-chromosome to prove it; however, the largest ‘racial mix’ of my DNA is certainly Polish (1/4), and I have more Native American blood than Elizabeth Warren. If the chore of writing about “my culture” was required, it would probably be about moonshine and keeping ahead of the ‘revenuers’.
Of course, the whole thrust of multiculturalism is to ‘divide and conquer’. If we all thought of ourselves as ‘Americans’, sharing a common heritage, language and customs, then it would be more difficult to create divisions to tear us apart.

Donald Campbell, According to Hoyt 26 Comments [4/6/2015 3:35:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 107629

If you're ashamed of being a Christian, Jesus is ashamed of you.

Requested by Starrceline.

I can't tell you how many times people have told me that I "make them ashamed to be a Christian."
Let's ignore for the moment that the only reason they say this is because I believe and proclaim the Bible, and let's instead zero in on the "I'm ashamed to be a Christian" part.
Let's see what the Bible has to say about people being ashamed of God, His word, and being called followers of God.


Mark 8:38
"Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation;
of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the glory of his Father with the holy angels."

Luke 9:26
"For whosoever shall be ashamed of me and of my words, of him shall the Son of man be ashamed,
when he shall come in his own glory, and in his Father's, and of the holy angels."


Yeah. Jesus doesn't take too kindly to cowards who proclaim their shame and embarrassment to be called His followers.
For the rest of us who don't want to be cowards, what instruction does the Bible have for us?


Romans 1:16
"For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation
to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek."

2 Thessalonians 3:14
"And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man,
and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed."

2 Timothy 1:8
"Be not thou therefore ashamed of the testimony of our Lord, nor of me his prisoner:
but be thou partaker of the afflictions of the gospel according to the power of God;"

2 Timothy 1:12
"For the which cause I also suffer these things: nevertheless I am not ashamed:
for I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day."

1 Peter 4:16
"Yet if any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf."

ExaltGod, deviantart 18 Comments [4/6/2015 3:07:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By:

Quote# 107618

“It’s Christianity that the left hates most of all because that is the foundation of our country and all of our freedoms come from that,” Coulter said. “The rest of the world is a cesspool of violence and atrocities. This is the most consequential nation on Earth and the fact that these Christians would rather get praise from the New York Times and Nicholas Kristof by changing bedpans of Ebola patients in Nigeria, rather than stand up to the New York Times and fight against abortion and fight against these bullies, and I don’t think it’s gay bullies, I think it’s as you call them, secular progressives or liberals. The media, they’re the ones who are trying to tear down this country by going directly at the heart of America which is Christianity.”

Ann Coulter, Salon 36 Comments [4/5/2015 4:23:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: KittyKaboom

Quote# 107617

When it comes to gay marriage a business owner may not support a homosexual couple wanting to get married, not because they are homosexual, but because they do not believe in same-sex marriage and may even consider it an act of evil that would contradict their conscience.

So the difference is in the first case it would be discrimination against a person. In the second case it is not discrimination against a person but the withholding of participation in a perceived evil.

To see that this is not discrimination against a person or homosexuals let's consider the possibility of two heterosexual males wanting to marry each other (seems highly unlikely but a logical possibility). However, the business owner refuses to help because he is against same-sex marriage. One could hardly accuse the business owner of discrimination against homosexuals since they are not homosexual. (Why two heterosexual males would want to marry each other is strange but not the issue. Perhaps they are being paid. Or they want to claim certain tax benefits). The issue is about same-sex marriage, not the persons sexual orientation. The business owner is not discriminating against anyone here. He refuses to help marry any same sex couple, whether they are homosexual or heterosexual. Ultimately, because he refuses to participate in evil.

To give a further analogy to illustrate my point. Imagine Hitler asking a business owner to supply him with gas ovens for the purpose of killing jews. If the business owner refused it wouldn't be an act of discrimination against Germans fuhrers but rather the business owner's refusal to comply with evil based on his conscience. Should society treat this as an act of discrimination against Hitler or should they appeal to reason and see it as an act of conscience, the refusal to participate in evil?

carl, Yahoo answers 31 Comments [4/5/2015 4:19:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: zipperback

Quote# 107616

[On possible revision of Indiana's 'Religious Freedom' bill]

If Governor Pence signs this 'amended' bill, he will join the ranks of history's notorious traitors-- among them, Benedict Arnold and Judas Iscariot. I give him no slack in this matter whatsoever. I cannot believe that he is so stupid as NOT to know the consequences of putting language in the bill that would deprive Christian business owners of all standing in court if they "deny services" to homosexuals. For let's face it-- when a Christian wedding provider refuses to provide services for a so-called gay wedding, he is "denying services" to that homosexual, the same way that a Jewish baker would deny services to a neo-Nazi client if he were asked was asked to bake a cake for a neo-Nazi meeting in celebration of the legacy of Adolph Hitler, and refused to do so. That is discrimination on the part of that baker, but it is righteous discrimination, an act of 'discriminatory' moral judgment against the immorality of a certain event/ceremony/rally that the baker cannot in good conscience support; it is not an act of unrighteous discrimination against persons, as such, based on their innate inborn, God-given identity (as is the case with racial discrimination).

Mike Pence knows what the gay gestapo wants and he is apparently willing to give them the very language in this bill which he knows they will use to skewer Christians-- so if he signs this bill with such language included, that will make him an accomplice to a truly demonic agenda which aims to penalize the sons of God for honoring God's moral law in the way they run their business. He cannot claim, "That's not what I intend by signing this bill." If that is the consequence of signing it, it makes no difference what he 'intends,' and if that is his justification for signing it, he is either stupid, hypocritical, or just plain cowardly-- and all of these qualities-- stupidity, hypocrisy, and cowardice-- would equally disqualify him from public office. So I do not give him any slack whatsoever. Since I do not believe he is stupid, he must be either hypocritical or cowardly if he gratifies the gay gestapo by giving them what he knows they want to go on the attack against principled Christian business owners.

Such an act of compliance with freedom-hating militants would be unspeakably contemptible; it would strip him of any pretense of being a conservative. It would expose him as, at heart, a rank progressivist liberal who believes that morals are 'evolving' and that non-evolved people who believe in sexual morality should be pushed to the margins of society and denied the right to own or run a business. It would show that in his heart, he truly despises the principle of religious liberty, as our forefathers intended it to be lived out in a civil society, and that he favors fascism-- homofascism, in particular. It would place him in the category of a nefarious traitor to his own constituents and to the cause of righteousness, justice, and religious freedom. Let us pray that God convicts him of the sinfulness of such a traitorous act, and stop him from backtracking on the proud and principled defense of religious liberty in Indiana.

Martin Rizley, BarbWire 26 Comments [4/5/2015 4:18:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 107615

(Reuters) - Tensions between French National Front leader Marine Le Pen and her father Jean-Marie worsened on Thursday as the 86-year-old founder of the far-right party defended having described Nazi gas chambers as a "detail of history".

Since taking over from her father in 2011, Marine Le Pen has tried to rid the anti-immigrant party of its anti-Semitic image and widen its voter appeal as she readies a bid for the French presidency in 2017.

In a television interview, Jean-Marie Le Pen defended a 1996 comment that gas chambers used to kill Jews in the Holocaust were "merely a detail in the history of World War Two", a remark for which he was convicted of inciting racial hatred and fined.

"I deeply disagree with him. I take note of what he said but I believe that those coming over to vote for us understand what is going on ... He is being deliberately provocative," she told the website of Le Figaro daily.

[...]

While other FN officials have been stripped of their party membership for racism, there has been no move to bar Jean-Marie Le Pen from a party of which he still holds the title of honorary president. He is popular with many FN members and will stand as a candidate in December's regional elections.

The FN founder rejected all accusations of anti-Semitism and defended the gas chamber comment as a self-evidence.

"I stand by this because I believe it is the truth," he told BFM TV. What I said is what I think - the gas chambers were a detail of the history of the war. Unless of course we are suggesting the war was a detail of the gas chambers."

Asked about the current state of the FN, he called it a party for patriots including "fervent Petainists", a reference to Philippe Petain, the general who led the French war-time government that cooperated with Nazi Germany's racial policies.

Jean-Marie Le Pen, Reuters 12 Comments [4/5/2015 4:18:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 107614

Brian, the Homofascist Gaystapo sodomite POS who left the above comment is sadly correct. The time is past when economic or political action will work. We are dealing with walking pieces of human debris such as the degenerate above. They hate Christians and are dedicated to the destruction of the Constitution in general and the First Amendment in particular. It is not possible to reason with human refuse whom would pay someone to paste fake tits on him and cut his dick off in an attempt to turn him into a "woman." Forget about political or economic action. Where ballots fail bullets will prevail.

Michael Myers, BarbWire 18 Comments [4/5/2015 4:16:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 107609

What concerns me, though, is the possibility that Mr. Cook, and many of his fellow liberals, actually do understand what Jim Crow laws were, what the Indiana RFRA does, and still believe that a connection between the two is logical. What we’ve seen in American culture over the last few years is a tectonic shift in how many on the left think about the relationship between sexual politics and law. Emerging is a portrait of what my friend Alastair Roberts calls “New Morality.” New Morality is a specific narrative about human ethics, particularly the sexual kind, that places certain moral demands on all who want to participate in public life. The New Morality is specific about what must happen to those who refuse its worldview: They must relinquish the right to be heard.

New Morality is not liberalism, at least the way liberalism is often explained. Most social conservatives see the major threat of liberalism as permissiveness, the sanctioning of immoral or un-American behavior that threatens the social order. There’s still truth in that, of course, but New Morality is actually the opposite of permissiveness, it is prescription. It’s not quite right to think of New Morality liberalism as simply allowing too many things. Rather, by subjugating civil life to a set of postmodern doctrines about the autonomous self, it allows too few. Dissent has become heresy, and heresy cannot co-exist with the pure faith. We used to picture liberalism as pushing the boundaries of our conscience. New Morality liberalism has found an entirely new conscience, and seeks to shrink the margins, not expand them.

The belief that the Indiana RFRA is a license for discrimination is coherent only if one believes that offering any sort of legal recourse for businesses in discrimination lawsuits is itself intolerant. But that’s exactly where the times have taken us. We have arrived at a place where prominent columnists can speak openly about “stamping out” voices who disagree with New Morality. We see private Christian universities punished for hiring policies consistent with their charters and articles of faith. We see the personal lives of judges carefully screened and regulated for anti-New Morality activity. What is being created before our eyes is in no way secular. It is religion, and religious orthodoxy is the price of citizenship.

So then, we come back to the issue of what liberalism means. My question is: Who are today’s liberals? Who are the ones who will protest the creation of a state faith in New Morality and argue for the public inclusion of those with differing opinions? Who will widen the margins of civic life? Where are the true Jeffersons, the spokespeople for pluralism, the lovers of debate and of bottom-up cultural creation?

Can we find those liberals who defer to debate and persuasion rather than fiat and coercion? I’m afraid we have no choice. This isn’t about special protection for or the privileging of evangelicalism; it’s about recovering a sense of belonging for all in the public square. To be liberal is to believe that no social orthodoxy is ever worth more than freedom of conscience. That is precisely the conviction that is at risk today. Against this backdrop, Indiana’s RFRA is a fundamentally liberal law. The question is: Where are its liberal champions?

Samuel James, Inklingations 14 Comments [4/5/2015 4:14:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: AJ Williams

Quote# 107608

@iamrobineublind Bigots and discriminators already are a protected class. They're called homosexuals.

Bryan Fischer , Twitter 16 Comments [4/5/2015 4:13:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: FELIX LÆTVS

Quote# 107595

Why are Our Youth Being Intentionally Corrupted in America?

Dr. Ablow tries to analyze why alcoholism is plaguing America. He theorizes that Americans are fleeing reality. Dr. Ablow fails to address the powerful influence of music celebrities on our youth, who are even called “American Idols” on television. Famous singers Toby Keith and Jimmy Buffet glorify drunkenness in their music, as do many singers in all genres. Toby Keith has influence over millions of young people, singing insane garbage like the song, “Get Drunk And Be Somebody!” Toby Keith certainly is “White Trash With Money,” which is the shameful titled of his album. It's not that hard to figure out why drunkenness has become such a big problem in America. Acts 4:20, “For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard.” Are we in flight from reality in America, or are our youth being led astray from reality by wicked people? Youth are extremely impressionable.

If their idols are getting drunk, abusing themselves with drugs, and behaving recklessly, then so will America's youth. Singer Justin Bieber was arrested in January of 2014 for driving under the influence in Florida, using Marijuana. Toxicology tests done showed that Bieber had Marijuana and the drug Zanax in his system. He had no prescription. Sadly, Bieber has influence over MILLIONS of teens and preteens. What an idiot! Bieber ought have his singing contract cancelled as a message to others who also use drugs. That's what game officials do to professional sport's athletes who use drugs, destroying their entire career for using steroids. Yet, Bieber can abuse Zanax and Marijuana while driving down the street, risking other people's lives by his stupid recklessness, and it's let go.

Bieber blasphemes God in a recent April 2014 shameful rap video titled “THE PLEDGE,” along with Brandon Burke. I won't even link to the video on YouTube, because it's sick trash. They display 2nd Chronicles 7:14 in their shameful music video (if you call that noise music)...

2nd Chronicles 7:14, “If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.”

Bieber's alleged Christian song is like a stripper praising the cross while she's taking her clothes off. Rap music is intensely disrespectful, worldly and tasteless. Rap music is synonymous with America's drug-problem, street gangs, slum lords, crack houses, ghetto culture and all the wickedness associated with it. Our youth are being influenced by evil, selfish, money-hungry, fools. Bieber is an Illuminati puppet who has sold his soul to Satan! It is sinful to desecrate the Word of God, which is what Bieber is doing!

It is not a coincidence that Katy Perry, Jay-Z, Miley Cyrus, Justin Bieber, Beyonce, Kesha and other despicable characters are leading America's youth by example into a moral sewer of depravity and sleaze. This is all deliberate to destroy the backbone of the United States, which is the home. I know this sounds way out there and conspiratorial, but I can prove what I am saying, as I will show you. The average person today is woefully ignorant about so many things. I say this with great sadness, for our ignorance is Satan's greatest advantage over us.

[...]

What a powerful mouthful of truth! Kids today are being brainwashed by television (i.e., hellivision) and music to have no morals, and to backtalk (sass) their parents. That's exactly what the Communists want. It's not uncommon these days to hear children on TV telling their parents to grow up or to be quiet. The same defiance is found in movies, whether by Walt Disney or Warner Brothers. Music is without a doubt the biggest offender. There is nothing more detrimental to the spiritual growth of a teenager than worldly music, which captivates the soul, and preaches a gospel of SELF, SEX, and SATAN.

To help you understand what's going on in the world today, please consider that Communism was created by the globalists, aka, the Illuminati (formally recognized in 1775, whose leader was Adam Weishaupt). There is an evil group of men and women who intend to create a world government system. They've been working at it from generation-to-generation, because Satan is behind it all. Biblical prophecy foretells of coming world government.

David J. Stewart, Jesus Is Precious 24 Comments [4/5/2015 4:10:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: TimeToTurn

Quote# 107593

“Smithsonian Institution "Natural History" Museum (Not Exactly)”

2 of 5 stars Reviewed July 26, 2012

I do recommend going to The Smithsonian "Natural History" Museum for the wonderful building, the dinosaur reconstructions, the food (somewhat expensive), and more. However, I am giving the "Natural History" Museum a Poor rating because they continue to state many opinions as if they are fact. They state over and over millions of years as if fact, but the verdict is in that this cannot be truth. For example, they state the T-Rex died out 65 million years ago. This is actually impossible for several reasons. Dr. Mary Schweitzer of North Carolina State University recently found red blood vessels and osteocytes in a T-Rex femur. This is soft tissue which could not conceivably live a very long period of time. I have just stated a fact of history about Dr. Mary Schweitzers T-Rex. In addition, soft tissue in dinosaurs has also been confirmed now in duck billed dinosaurs. I wish the Smithsonian would do a fact check on their exhibits. They could easily let museum goers know that cave drawings, rock carvings and brass engravings from around 800 AD to 1496 AD respectively have been found of different types of dinosaurs. For example, the Cave Drawing in National Bridges Monument (White River Canyon) of a sauropod, the rock carving of Stegosaurus from around 800 AD in Cambodia, and Bishop Richard Bells tomb in Carlisle Cathedral from 1496 includes brass engravings of dinosaurs long before the discipline paleontology was created. Remember, modern reconstruction of dinosaurs began in the late 1800's long after Bishop Richard Bells tomb was laid. Yes, man and dinosaurs lived together and people from a thousand years ago knew what they looked like without the need for paleontology because they had seen them. The Smithsonian does not even provide this information. They just tell the same old stories about "millions of years" to people with willing ears. Please look all of this information up on Google. Remember, the truth is available if you just search for it. However, at The Smithsonian Institution you will not get this information. They probably will not even tell you the term dinosaur came about in 1841. What term would have been used by men to describe dinosaurs before 1841. Perhaps, behemoth. Read Job 40:15. This is straight forward stuff. My dad was head of the Petroleum Engineering Dept. at The University of Tulsa, so I like geology. Did you know that Dr. Steve Austin got pyroxene crystals from samples of rock from the Mount St Helens new lava dome. This rock was only 11 years old when he collected the samples however the pyroxene gave dates of two million years old and even more from various labs. Obviously, the rock was only 11 years old. We all saw the lava dome form on national television. Rock dating techniques are full of assumptions. You won't read this at The Smithsonian, however. The Smithsonian should have an exhibit on the following evolutionary hoaxes and frauds, as well. Piltdown Man was an Orangutan Jaw bone fused together with completely different Modern Human Skull to make it look like they were from the same fossil. The Orangutan teeth were filed down to make them look human. Piltdown Man was exposed as a fraud. Fact. Nebraska Man drawings in The Illustrated London News in 1922 by Amédée Forestier portraying supposed "Man Missing link" were exposed as fraud when the entire drawings were based on A single pig's tooth. Yes, this is a fact too. This even continues today. What about Archaeoraptor it was supposed to be a half-bird/half-dinosaur it turned out to be a fossil forgery, a composite of many fossils glued together.
The Smithsonian has many artistic renderings of so-called missing links, but it is simply artistic, not scientific. Since dating methods point to a young earth. For example, The magnetic field decay rate, rapid magnetic field reversals, carbon - 14 dating based on this decay rate, amount of salt in the sea(more salt enters the sea each year than leaves it), dinosaur soft tissue, CPT, smooth sedimentary layer uplift without cracking, no bioturbation in catastrophically laid down layers, polystrate fossils, rapid coal seam formation, helium seapage, and much more, all point to a young earth. Well, I suppose The Smithsonian "Natural History" Museum is not History, but just a made up story of millions of years that never happened, and it is time the masses spoke up about it. After all, science should be based on what can be observed and tested.

Visited May 2012

Lampstand, tripadvisor 39 Comments [4/4/2015 7:20:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 30

Quote# 107592

This man here, read his book, research who he is if you need to totally disagrees with your assertion. The Testimony of the Evangelists: The Gospels Examined by the Rules of Evidence A Harvard grad. a major law school named after him... You cannot put your eternal soul in jeopardy by weakly pushing off the evidence. Eternity is a duration of time which ceases. And you will sit there having lied to yourself and help damn others souls you are wrongly affecting. Think about this Rachel. Wake up and strength the things that remain. You have people in your life that you are responsible for under God to try and lead them to Him instead of what you are now doing.

CAM, Amazon Atheist Forum 14 Comments [4/4/2015 7:10:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 16

Quote# 107591

Beyond the fashionable "anti-Zionism" of the Euro Left is a starker reality: The demographic energy not just in Lionel Bart's East End but in almost every Western European country is "Asian." Which is to say, Muslim. A recent government statistical survey reported that the United Kingdom's Muslim population is increasing ten times faster than the general population. Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Antwerp, and many other Continental cities from Scandinavia to the Côte d'Azur will reach majority Muslim status in the next few years.

Brussels has a Socialist mayor, which isn't that surprising, but he presides over a caucus a majority of whose members are Muslim, which might yet surprise those who think we're dealing with some slow, gradual, way-off-in-the-future process here. But so goes Christendom at the dawn of the third millennium: the ruling party of the capital city of the European Union is mostly Muslim.

[...]

You would think the deluded multi-culti progressives would understand: In the end, this isn't about Gaza, this isn't about the Middle East; it's about them. It may be some consolation to an ever-lonelier Israel that, in one of history's bleaker jests, in the coming Europe the Europeans will be the new Jews.

Mark Steyn, Aish.com 8 Comments [4/4/2015 7:10:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 107589

Is atheistic terrorism worse than Islamic terrorism? Liberal denial prevents honest reporting on whether the Germanwings co-pilot who killed 150 passengers was an atheist.

Andy Schlafly, Conservapedia, Main Page 36 Comments [4/4/2015 7:08:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 24
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 107585

Former Brazilian presidential candidate Levy Fidelix was condemned by the São Paulo Supreme Court to pay a fine of R$ 1 million (over US$300,000) in a public civil action filed by the LGBT movement.

The condemnation, delivered Friday (March 14), deals with declarations that Catholic Fidelix made in an interview in a TV show September 28, 2014, where he said:

"The large intestine does not reproduce… How can I, a family man and a grandfather, be afraid of losing votes? I prefer not having such votes, but to be a moral father and a moral grandfather to teach his child, to instruct his grandchild. Let us end this. I just read that the Holy Father, the Pope, expelled a pedophile from the Vatican. He did very well. He is right! We train our children all their lives in a religious way so that they may really find a good family way."

Fidelix also recommended psychological treatment for homosexuals and he said that homosexuals should be kept away from families and their children.

[...]

Even not taking his religion in consideration, is his view different from what most Brazilians think? No. According to a study by an institute connected to the Workers’ Party, 99% of the Brazilian people are “homophobic,” that is, they have views contrary to homosexual behavior.

Today, Fidelix has been fined R$ 1 million for voicing a view against the obvious homosexual depravity. Tomorrow, ministers and priests and their members may be the next.

If the Brazilian people do not make demonstrations for Fidelix’s free speech, Cuba, Venezuela, Axelrod, Obama and other antifamily radicals are going to keep in the Brazilian presidency individuals committed to homosexual agenda.

Julio Severo and Levy Fidelix, Barb Wire 13 Comments [4/4/2015 7:07:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 107584

It’s nothing less than amazing that atheist groups are evangelizing for unbelief. They’re working feverishly to remove every vestige of America’s religious heritage, filing legal challenges against religious displays on public grounds, launching book projects to give prison inmates alternatives to religious literature distributed in penitentiaries, putting up billboards that mock Christ and the stories of the Bible and Christian-based holidays, organizing Atheist Pride Marches, planting atheist churches, sending out people in city parks with juggling shows and informational booths, and running radio and TV ads.

Dr. Mark Creech, Barb Wire 27 Comments [4/4/2015 7:05:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 107583

The growing persecution and spiritual decline of America is bad enough already, but it is going to get much worse in the future. It is difficult to say how many Muslims are coming into the U.S. when people are saying the number is much higher than our government is letting on. And Pres. Obama has already said he will increase it even more. It is sad to know that Syrian Muslims are being brought in, but Syrian Christians are being refused entry. Bringing non-Christians in and keeping Christians out changes things.

Increasing the population of Muslims is going to mean more mosques; more demands to stop monitoring mosques, more demands to stop profiling Muslims; more demands to bring in extended families of Muslims; more demands for Muslim prayers before Congress, at city council meetings and the like.

It will mean more demands for Sharia Law: more attempts to get rid of the Bible, portray Christians as hate-mongers and extremists, send Christians to sensitivity training, get rid of chaplains in the military and the like; more demands to change school textbooks, lunch menus, etc. and perhaps more terrorist attacks, especially on churches.

Muslims are coming (and being brought) to the U.S. for many reasons, but the primary reason they are coming is to fundamentally transform the U.S. into a Muslim nation.

I have been to Mexico and seen many faithful Hispanic Christians. The vast majority is nominal at best. About 75-80%, say they are Catholic. They say they are Catholic because their parents were Catholic or they believe they were born Catholic. But their Catholic beliefs are far from traditional mainline Christianity. In many cases, their beliefs have been blended with ritualism, magic, voodoo, varied Indian cultural practices and the like.

Several years ago, a missionary took my wife and me to a Roman Catholic Church in Mexico and a voodoo ceremony was being performed in the church. I am not against legalized immigration (and I don’t blame anyone for seeking a better life), but I am saying that letting 25-30 million people with many kinds of strange beliefs come into the U.S. in the next 4 to 5 years (and not letting Christians in) will decrease the percentage of true Christians in the U.S.

Understand that the Bible is not wrong. Every jot and tittle will be fulfilled including what it says about persecution. Understand too, that what Islamic terrorists do in other countries (behead Christians, burn churches, burn people alive, cut babies in two, sell people into slavery) they will also do in the U.S. Their threats to raise the Islamic State flag over the White House and to blow up the White House should be taken seriously.

The spirit of Antichrist is already here and a flood of epic proportions is on the way. It will further weaken the U.S. spiritually and we should be concerned for our Lord, our children, our grandchildren, others and ourselves.

Daymond Duck, Rapture Forums 22 Comments [4/4/2015 7:05:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 107582

Gay community, I am your daughter. My mom raised me with her same-sex partner back in the '80s and '90s. [...] I still feel like gay people are my people. I've learned so much from you.

[...]

I'm writing to you because I'm letting myself out of the closet: I don't support gay marriage. But it might not be for the reasons that you think.

[...]

It's not because you're gay. I love you, so much. It's because of the nature of the same-sex relationship itself.

[...]

Same-sex marriage and parenting withholds either a mother or father from a child while telling him or her that it doesn't matter. That it's all the same. But it's not. A lot of us, a lot of your kids, are hurting. My father's absence created a huge hole in me, and I ached every day for a dad. I loved my mom's partner, but another mom could never have replaced the father I lost.

[...]

Gay marriage doesn't just redefine marriage, but also parenting. It promotes and normalizes a family structure that necessarily denies us something precious and foundational. It denies us something we need and long for, while at the same time tells us that we don't need what we actually crave. That we will be okay. But we're not. We're hurting.

Kids of divorced parents are allowed to say, "Hey, mom and dad, I love you, but the divorce really crushed me and has been so hard. It shattered my trust and made me feel like it was my fault. It is so hard living in two different houses." Kids of adoption are allowed to say, "Hey, adoptive parents, I love you. But this is really hard for me. I suffer because my relationship with my first parents was broken. I'm confused and I miss them even though I've never met them."

But children of same-sex parents haven't been given the same voice. It's not just me. There are so many of us. Many of us are too scared to speak up and tell you about our hurt and pain, because for whatever reason it feels like you're not listening. That you don't want to hear. If we say we are hurting because we were raised by same-sex parents, we are either ignored or labeled a hater.

Heather Barwick, The Federalist 25 Comments [4/4/2015 7:03:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 107580

Muslims are not the victims, either in Europe or Israel. They are not attacking Jews in Europe because the Europeans estranged them, but because they choose to be estranged. They have made choices based on their culture and religion. And those choices must be examined on their own terms.

[...]

The issue isn't Israel. It isn't even Europe. It's Islam.

[...]

When politicians blame Muslim violence on the failure to integrate, they are admitting that the outbreaks of Muslim violence are a throwback to the Middle East. They are Islamic, rather than European, expressions of hate.

[...]

Europeans, Jewish and non-Jewish, are leaving Europe.

They are leaving behind Socialist governments, high taxes, violent Muslim gangs and a sense of despair. They are leaving behind burning synagogues, Sharia patrols, moral vacuums and sex grooming gangs. Muslim anti-Semitism is not a European problem, but it is the symptom of a very European problem.

Daniel Greenfield, Frontpage Mag 8 Comments [4/4/2015 7:02:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 107579

When I see something with astounding complexity and clear design with purpose, like a space shuttle for instance, the first thing I think is that it clearly created itself. You know, SLOWLY over thousands of years, not right away or anything. I'm NOT an id!ot! (Duh). Of course the tires were not actually "designed" to allow for landings, the heat shield not for protection of the crew, the life support system either. I mean, how would the shuttle know a crew would be inside it right? Duh. And don't get me started on the parachute, computer systems, cargo bay and windows! All completely by accident and without purpose.

What a bunch of morons. Yeah, when you see clear and complex design with clear purpose and function A DESIGNER is absolutely out of the question! GET HELP man.You're embarrassing yourself

"Just the discoveries in a strand of DNA should have ended all debate a long time ago: “DNA is an information code. The overwhelming conclusion is that information does not and cannot arise spontaneously by mechanistic processes. Intelligence is a necessity in the origin of any informational code, including the genetic code, no matter how much time is given.” (Lane Lester, Ph.D. Genetics, The Natural Limits to Biological Change)

Hmmm, science tells us that an INTELLIGENCE was necessary to have created the code. A DESIGNER.
Nah. Think I'll go with the fascists from the liberal left. No magic sky daddy. Just Magic.
On second thought, Maybe I'll stick with science and the clear evidence of Intelligent Design. Then I won't look so stupid :)

The Last Trump, Christian News Network 22 Comments [4/4/2015 7:01:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 107577

The 'Most liberal American cities' are so-called "progressive" cities in the United States that are usually are in Blue states / unfree states.

These most leftist cities typically have even more draconian Nanny state local laws in addition to the onerous liberal state laws in support of the progressive police state, especially support for Gun free zones, Gun control and ammunition control, along with the Homosexual agenda (see San Francisco values), and illegal immigration "sanctuary" and tend to follow Hollywood values in terms of drugs and other liberal values.

Liberal Cities Generally Found in "Unfree States"

Almost all of the liberal cities, with the exception of Austin, Texas, are found in the the Blue state liberal Democrat "death spiral" Nanny states / progressive Police states. "The East Coast and West Coast (Left Coast) had the most liberal states including Vermont, Massachusetts, Delaware, New York, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington, Maine, California and New Jersey." [1]

Phil Reiff, Director of the liberal Bay Area Center for Voting Research says, "While there are a few liberal cities without large African American populations, these wind up being the exceptions. The list of Americas most liberal cities is dominated by cities with large African American populations that are concentrated in the Northeast, Midwest and California."[2]

Americas Most Liberal Cities (in descending order)
1. Detroit, Michigan - see Bankruptcy
2. Gary, Indiana
3. Berkeley, California - see Professor values
4. Washington, D.C.
5. Oakland, California - see Black Panthers
6. Inglewood, California
7. Newark, New Jersey
8. Cambridge, Massachusetts - see Professor values
9. San Francisco, California - see San Francisco values
10. Flint, Michigan - see Michael Moore
11. Cleveland, Ohio - see Dennis Kucinich
12. Hartford, Connecticut
13. Paterson, New Jersey
14. Baltimore, Maryland
15. New Haven, Connecticut
16. Seattle, Washington - see Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer of liberal Microsoft
17. Chicago, Illinois - see Obama and Rahm Emanuel
18. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19. Birmingham, Alabama
20. St. Louis, Missouri - see Ferguson, Missouri Michael Brown
21. New York City, New York - see Michael Bloomberg
22. Providence, Rhode Island
23. Minneapolis, Minnesota
24. Boston, Massachusetts
25. Buffalo, New York
26. Madison, Wisconsin - see Professor values
27. Austin, Texas
28. Hollywood, California - see Hollywood values
29. Los Angeles, California
30. Portland, Oregon

TheAmericanRedoubt, Conservapedia 24 Comments [4/4/2015 7:01:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 11