1 2 3 4 5 10 15 16 | bottom
Quote# 113918

Bottom line: the Founders’ Constitution permits States to prohibit the building of mosques. For the safety and security of the American people, perhaps the time for them to start doing it is now.

Bryan Fischer, American Family Association 26 Comments [10/27/2015 6:25:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 113917

The Founders gave to the States unilateral authority to regulate religious expression as they saw fit. While I am certainly not advocating for it, this means that, constitutionally, States still today can have established churches if they choose, as ten of them did at the time of the founding. And it also means that States can prohibit the building of mosques if they choose.

Bryan Fischer, American Family Association 24 Comments [10/27/2015 6:24:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 113914

Homoz all seem so cognitively impaired, incapable of gleaning even the simplest of things. Fifi, there was a little word in my comment that seemed to fly right over your vacant little head: the word "HARM". Churches HELP - by providing a bulwark against people like YOU who wish them HARM.

If this is too complicated, perhaps you can ask a gay pedophile who invaded the Priesthood. I'm sure you are V E R Y acquainted with one.

RCQ_92130, BarbWire 17 Comments [10/27/2015 6:20:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 113913

Once upon a time there was a dear little girl who loved her grandmother supremely. The grandmother had given to her a little cap of red velvet, which suited her so well she would never wear anything else. Thus, everyone called her Little Red Riding Hood.

One day her father and mother said to her, “Come Little Red Riding Hood, here is a basket of cookies, assorted nuts, fruit and other goodies. Take them to your grandmother and enjoy them with her.”

Grandmother lived far out in the woods and Little Red Riding Hood had never thought much about the dangers she might encounter as she entered the forest. Soon she would meet a wolf, a wicked creature indeed.

“Good day, Little Red Riding Hood. Where are you headed so early in the day?” the wolf said.

“Good morning to you, Mr. Wolf,” said Little Red Riding Hood. “I’m on my way to my grandmother’s house.”

“What is it that you have in the basket?” he asked.

“A basket of many blessings,” she replied. “I plan to enjoy all of them with my wonderful grandmother.”

“Where does your grandmother live?” asked the wolf.

“Her house, picturesque, stands under the shade of a beautiful grove of strong oak trees, where refreshing waters pass in a brook, flowers grow, and the birds sing. Surely you’ve seen it before,” Little Red Riding Hood replied with innocent charm.

The wolf thought to himself, “What a tender, impressionable and naive child. What a nice mouthful she will be when I eat her. She will be a much better meal than the old woman. But if I am to have her, I must work craftily, so I might consume them both.”

For a little while longer the wolf spoke with Little Red Riding Hood, mostly telling her about the way wolves are wrongly perceived by people. “Wolves are nothing to be feared, they just want to be treated like everybody else,” he told her.

While on her way, Little Red Riding Hood pondered, “Yes, I think I can understand how the wolf must feel. Perhaps he is a victim, as he says, and his way is not decadent.”

Meanwhile, the wolf slipped away and made straight for grandmother’s house ahead of Little Red Riding Hood.

When he reached grandmother’s house, he knocked on the door.

Grandmother called out, “Who is it, and what do you wish?”

“It is Little Red Riding Hood,” replied the wolf. “I am bringing a basket of goodies to brighten your day – to bring about a whole new day for you, grandmother,” said the wolf convincingly.

When grandmother lifted the latch to the door, the wolf devoured her. Then he put on her clothes, dressed in her nightgown and cap and lay in the bed as if he were grandmother.

When Little Red Riding Hood arrived at grandmother’s house she was surprised to find the door ajar. There was something strange and uncomfortable about this situation, even unnatural, she thought to herself.

As she made her way through the house, she came upon grandmother’s bedroom, and there laid her grandmother in her bedclothes with her cap pulled over her face, with the shades down, and looking inexplicably unfamiliar.

“Oh grandmother,” she said, “What big ears, eyes, hands, and mouth you have.”

“Certainly you can appreciate diversity,” replied the wolf. And just when he thought the time was right, he sprang from the bed to eat Little Red Riding Hood.

A woodcutter nearby heard her screams and rushed to save her.

He overcame the wolf with his trusty axe. The townspeople hurried to the scene, cheered and supported the woodcutter, except for five foolish judges.

The five foolish judges declared the woodcutter prejudiced, bigoted, and intolerant. They said he had no right to defend either the grandmother or Little Red Riding Hood. They said the axe must be cast away.

Standing with the five foolish judges were also some clever foxes, relatives of the wolf, who argued the wolf’s proclivity for carnage was completely normal. In fact, to suppress the wolf’s appetites, something which was inherent to his nature, would be wrong, they said. Besides, it was claimed that grandmothers are like old traditions that need to give way to the new anyhow.

And so, on the basis of these considerations, not only did the mindset of many of the townspeople start to change, but the wolf was lauded and praised. Many townspeople would fly the wolf flag from atop their village cottages and buildings. An advocacy group called WUVS, standing for “Wolves, Underfed, Voracious, and Famished,” fought to give wolves special protections in law. And no one dared challenge the true nature of the wolf for fear his house, his livelihood, and even his freedom might be taken away.

So the years passed, grandmother was dead and Little Red Riding Hood would live her life in confusion, always in danger of many wolves and never to enjoy the basket of goodies with her grandmother, whom she had known and loved for so long.

*****

I would not do all the work for the reader here, but if it helps, in this fable of Little Red Riding Hood, the Grandmother is traditional marriage. The wolf is homosexual activism. Little Red Riding Hood is an unsuspecting public, and, in another way, children and their future. The basket of assorted goodies signifies the many blessings and joys of real marriage. The woodcutter is true religion’s opposition to so-called gay rights. His axe is state constitutional amendments to define marriage as one man and one woman. The five foolish judges are the U.S. Supreme Court justices who ruled to redefine marriage for the nation. The clever foxes are professionals who argue homosexuality is inherent, fixed, unalterable, and normal. The townspeople represent ever-changing public opinion.

Mark Creech, BarbWire 41 Comments [10/27/2015 6:17:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 18

Quote# 113911

kiwiwatcher, if the world’s population is eight billion, at least two billion of these people will die in World War Three and the aftereffects of nuclear warfare (Revelation 6:8)…I hope the Russians will also nuke the Islamic strongholds in Europe, like London and Paris…Enough is enough.

Jewish Voice, Now The End Begins 21 Comments [10/27/2015 6:16:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: solomongrundy

Quote# 113905

[Matt Barber posts a satirical "interview with the progressive mind."]

I recently caught up with Progressy, iPhone in hand and sipping a Cinnamon Dolce Latte at a packed SoHo Starbucks between angry and aimlessly incoherent protests against the evil corporatocracy. He/she/ze/it graciously agreed to sit down and give me a brief, though refreshingly unguarded, interview.

[...]

MB: Some say that the main goal of progressives was never "marriage equality," but, rather, to undermine the very institutions of marriage and family. How do you respond to them?

Progressy: Well, duh. The very idea of marriage and family is offensive and obsolete. The whole point of marriage equality is to faze them out - to attack the patriarchy. You mentioned studies. Well, studies have shown that traditional marriage and the nuclear family structure have the harmful effect of both challenging and diminishing government authority. If anything and everything, any combination of people or peoples, young, old, male, female, related, unrelated, two to 100, can constitute marriage and family, then what need will there be for marriage and family at all? Since original marriage, "traditional marriage," so clearly undermines progressive state authority, it stands to follow that the family must be rendered meaningless.

The idea has always been for progressive government to replace family outright. Redefining the family into oblivion is just one means to establish widespread dependency on the government. We never gave two flips about "marriage equality." It was never about having the white picket fence, it's always been about burning down the white picket fence. Why honor one's "father and mother," after all, when one has the government? What need is there? Government merits both honor and respect. Not only does the traditional family provide little utility for the collective, it affirmatively undercuts respect for state authority. The government provides security. The government provides emotional stability. The government provides for each and every conceivable need. Therefore, the government is, effectively, both "father and mother." The government is family. "Honor thy father and mother?" Ha! Forget it. One day soon the progressive slogan, "Children, honor thy government" will be found posted throughout the halls of every public school. We've already done a bang up job removing prayer and any reference to God. Now it's time to replace them. Progressive government is god.

MB: OK, Progressy, thanks for your time today. It's been illuminating. Looking forward to the anarchy. Happy world domination.

Matt Barber, Barb Wire 39 Comments [10/27/2015 3:44:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 113904

[A judge ruled that ads for "The Muslims are Coming!", a movie about Muslims in comedy, must be allowed on New York City's buses and subways. Pamela Geller's bigoted ads were also initially rejected by the Metropolitan Transit Authority, but allowed to run after a judge ruled the ban was a violation of the First Amendment.]

Make no mistake. "The Muslims are Coming!" ad is political. This "movie" is nothing but agitprop for Islam under the guise of - you guessed it - making lame jokes about "Islamophobia." If that's comic, no one is laughing.

Nonetheless, the Muslims sued. And last week they won (of course), which shows how utterly corrupt the system is. A federal judge last Wednesday ordered the MTA to allow these dissemblers to run a series of advertisements promoting their film in the subway.

And no, "The Muslims Are Coming!" is not a film about the current invasion of Europe. It's political propaganda, a long diatribe about "Islamophobia," despite the obvious advantages of their status as Muslims in America today.

Pamela Geller, Rapture Forums 46 Comments [10/27/2015 3:37:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 113903

What would it do to every secular university science faculty if creationism were accepted and evolution proved a fraud? Evolutionists would finally be recognized as unscholarly, unwanted, and unnecessary. And maybe they would become unemployed! They would fall into the same category as flat-earthers, phrenologists, astrologers and snake handlers! (That is exactly my attitude toward the soothsayers of science.)

The museums of the world would have to make some major changes in their displays and propaganda. Their pitchmen would have to memorize new "facts" for their canned speeches.

Public schools would have to retrain their science teachers, and most of their science films and textbooks would have to be destroyed.

Bigoted judges who have ruled in favor of the myth-tellers would feel the sting of public embarrassment and join the ranks of the unemployed. Most likely, they would simply open up shop as attorneys and that's what we really need - more attorneys!

With evolution in disfavor, scientists would no longer seek to confirm the theory of evolution (now presumed to be a fact before beginning an investigation!), and they could get on with the business of true science. Scientists would no longer see only what is "respectable and acceptable," and would look at the evidence, making judgments based on that evidence even if it contradicted popular theory. They would decide that truth is more important than denigrating, denying, and denouncing Creationists.

Clergymen and theologians would sheepishly have to apologize to their followers for leading them into the swamps of theistic evolution, day-age theory, gap theory, and other unscriptural nonsense. Such religious leaders might once again preach that the Bible is reliable in toto as Creationists have been saying for many years.

Publishers of evolutionary tripe would, well, go out of business or start publishing New Age ranting, oriental religious musings, or the sexual fantasies of the latest pop star. Or, better yet, Barack Obama's Things I Did to Deserve the Nobel Peace Prize qualifying as the shortest book in literary history.

I can see an assortment of prestigious scientists, clergymen, professors, publishers, film makers, media personalities, and others holding a televised news conference where they apologize profusely to the youth of the world for teaching fraud, falsehood, fakery, and foolishness while calling it fact. Many of the mainline media would have to apologizze to [Ben] Carson and other Christians who declare that "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."

Now, a word of advice: Don't hold your breath for that news conference to take place. It won't, because many evolutionists are vain, venal, and venomous people. They are especially venomous when dealing with or discussing Creationists.

[...]

Principle would also require atheists to refuse any further book royalties and that they will not do. When evolution is dead the gravy train stops and evolutionists will have to look for work!

Dr. Don Boys, Barb Wire 43 Comments [10/27/2015 3:37:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 113902

[On the Southern Poverty Law Center classifying the Family Research Council and American Family Association as hate groups:]

The plain truth is that we at the FRC and AFA don't hate a living soul. We love homosexuals enough to tell them the truth about the physical and spiritual dangers of the homosexual lifestyle. We want something better for them than the darkness and disease associated with homosexual behavior. We want them to come out of the darkness into the light of the gospel of Christ. We are for the homosexual and so must be against the normalization and promotion of homosexuality.

Note the SPLC is no longer accusing FRC and AFA of hate or violence based on some objective standard. They have simply made a purely subjective assessment that our beliefs about human sexuality and our defense of natural marriage are so offensive to them that we must become the target of the unlimited resources of the federal government.

Do we disagree with the homosexual lobby about homosexuality? Of course. Do we hate them? Absolutely not. Do we advocate violence against them? Never have, never will. We are simply determined to tell the moral, spiritual and physical truth about nonnormative sexual behavior.

Bottom line: disagreement is not hatred, and the truth is not hate speech.

Bryan Fischer, Barb Wire 29 Comments [10/27/2015 3:24:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 113900

[It might be a bad idea to support Trump closing mosques, because it will take away our constitutional freedoms]

Does the constitution allow for Christian impostors, hiding their true beliefs in order to destroy ours from the inside? Or any other impostors posing as Christians? Smiling on the outside with an opposite plan on the inside? Spiritual decay HAS won; What do you call 60,000,000 abortions in America alone. God installed His truth in only one faith, and now nobody seems to know how to find it. What is more important? I would intervene in a charitable way if I knew that spreading true faith would help keep someone out of eternal, you know where. Our Constitution allows all faiths, does God?

Robert Thaler, WND 33 Comments [10/27/2015 3:23:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 113899

All mosques should be closed, and the islamic religion wannabe should be made illegal as the subversive foreign government that it is. We have enough problems with the Republican/Democrat party currently in power. There are too many muslilms in government positions right now, and they need to be removed, along with their sympathizers.

Fred_K, WND 20 Comments [10/27/2015 3:23:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 113897

The decentralization movement is nothing but pure satanic disorientation led by PF [Pope Francis] and his stone cold apostate heretics. It's the natural result of following Luther the heretic and his Deformation of Protestantism.

jacobum, LiteSiteNews 22 Comments [10/27/2015 3:08:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 113896

[This refers to Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood]

Cecile revealed she had an abortion. And to prove to herself how right she was to do this, she is destroying 300,000 of other people's babies a year. She is on a rampage in order to justify her "choice". But no matter how many cute "abortions are awesome" valentine cakes she makes; or how many pink-outs she holds; how much she "contributes to life-saving research"; or how many women and politicians she dupes into supporting the "right" to dismember living people- the decision she made to abort never becomes happy, good, right, just, healthy, etc. She must kill in order to prove she did the right thing. This is why she won't cave. She can't. She is so self-focused and powerful, the damage she did to herself and her baby have become a devastating poison for this society, and is spreading around the world. She has run amok. Rules don't apply to her or Planned Parenthood. Unrestrained destruction. Look at history. It's happened in other forms before. A little different each time so it is not recognizable until it is out of control.

Mary Sayre, LifeSiteNews 12 Comments [10/27/2015 3:08:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 113892

Dawkins’ Mind Is Closed

In an article titled “Atheist Richard Dawkins Calls It ‘Disgraceful’ That Presidential Hopefuls Are Creationists—and Reveals Which Religion Has ‘Maximum Toxicity,’” The Blaze website reports on a Fox News TV interview with prominent evolutionist Richard Dawkins.

The Blaze article stated:

Atheist biologist Richard Dawkins decried the fact that some Republican presidential candidates are creationists, calling it “disgraceful” and proclaiming that evolution is a “fact” that “you can not seriously disbelieve” . . . Dawkins repeatedly waded into controversial territory throughout the exchange, with Colmes at one point asking if the biologist believes that religious people are “mentally ill.” “It’s hard to use the word ‘mentally ill’ when there are so many of them,” Dawkins responded. “If they believed what they did and they were the only one they would undoubtedly be called mentally ill.”

During the interview, Dawkins was asked “whether the atheist leader would ever change his mind about God, he said that he’s open to the idea. ‘Just show me some evidence and I’ll change,’ Dawkins said.”

Well, Dawkins has been shown overwhelming evidence by many people through books, discussions, a radio debate with my friend Dr. Andy McIntosh, and so on! In fact, God tells us that people like Richard Dawkins are without excuse (Romans 1:20). Dawkins reminds me of the Pharisees in John 9. After Jesus had healed the man blind from birth, the Pharisees questioned the man and his parents, and even with the evidence glaring at them, they refused to believe. People like Dawkins also remind me of the chief priests in John 12:10 who wanted to kill Lazarus, the man Jesus raised from the dead. Because of their hardened hearts, they refused to believe Jesus raised Lazarus and decided to try to kill Lazarus to get rid of the evidence! Yes, these are apt comparisons when you consider people like Richard Dawkins. We need to pray for him. His heart is hard and he is blind.

. . . whose minds the god of this age has blinded, who do not believe, lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine on them. (2 Corinthians 4:4)

So is Dawkins truly “open” to believing in God? Well, he pretends that he is willing to listen to evidence—but the evidence from his own life clearly shows that he refuses to believe despite the evidence. He is like the scoffers in 2 Peter 3:5 who deliberately reject, or are willingly ignorant of Creation, the Flood, and the coming judgment (the very things Dawkins rejects). It is a deliberate act on their part to ignore the obvious and reject the truth!

I’m reminded of what Abraham said about the rich man who wanted to come back from the dead and warn his brothers about judgment after life:

“Abraham said to him, ‘They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.’ And he said, ‘No, father Abraham; but if one goes to them from the dead, they will repent.’ But he said to him, ‘If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead.’” (Luke 16:29–31)

Dawkins has spent most of his life rejecting the writings of Moses, particularly Genesis, and trying to get as many people as he can to follow his rebellious lifestyle that leads directly to hell. Yes, we do need to pray much for him.

Lord, open Richard Dawkins’ mind, and let the light of the glorious gospel of Jesus Christ illuminate his hardened heart!

Thanks for stopping by and thanks for praying,
Ken

Ken Ham, Answers in Genesis 52 Comments [10/26/2015 3:58:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 113885

The homosexual community have deliberately placed sodomite ministers into many churches to confuse the public. I heard President Bill Clinton once say that if leading theologians can't make up their mind on abortion, then how can he since he's only a layman in a Southern Baptist church? There are false theologians, unsaved liberals, who are deliberately promoted in the eyes of the public to confuse people on moral issues. However, there is no controversy if you believe the Bible. We're not supposed to look to theologians Mr. Clinton, we're supposed to SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES as Jesus commanded in John 5:39.

It's on purpose that the devil's crowd have entered the pulpit, to confuse people even more. ANYONE can apply for a 501c3 state-license (a non-profit corporation) and label their organization as “a church.” The Church of Satan is a 501c3 organization. There are ordained and state-licensed Wiccan organizations, providing witches to perform weddings and funerals legally. So you have to be very aware of this fact when you hear about all the crazy so-called “pastors” doing bizarre and nutty stuff; ANYONE can call themselves “a church.” Since most people don't know the Scriptures, they are likely to believe almost anything they are told. Ignorance is a dangerous thing, whether unintentional or deliberate.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 26 Comments [10/26/2015 3:47:26 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 113883

Feminism was a mistake. Yes, we're getting maybe 30-60% of pre-existing male productivity from females, but it's not worth the shit we currently have to put up with.

frankenmine, r/OffensiveSpeech 28 Comments [10/26/2015 2:23:48 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 113882

cultural marxism
The gradual process of destroying all traditions, languages, religions, individuality, government, family, law and order in order to re-assemble society in the future as a communist utopia. This utopia will have no notion of gender, traditions, morality, god or even family or the state. The Philosophy was proven not to Work already by Vladimir Lenin as he tried in vein to control and subjugate the people. He admitted before he died that capitalism was the only true system in which people understand how to live with each other.... Lenin knew that there were a few western Idiots who kept spreading the communist ideas long after Lenin gave up.... he called these people useful idiots as they had more emotion than brains and could be used to subvert the western states for a military takeover in the future as the citizens would already be perverted and sick and weak from poisonous ideas, decadent lusts and mindless entertainment.
cultural marxism: "everything is relative man".... "there is no truth".... "reality is what we make of it".... smoke dope and drop out dude!!! .... we don't need money... cops are violent pigs (especially the white ones). Women are smarter and betteer than men, all men are rapists. "get in touch with your feelings".... "if it feels good then do it"... "she so empowered!!... you go girl!!"... "there is no god"... "Let's burn the bible" "don't criticize islam!!"... "you're a bigot" "a homophobe" "you're an agist classist pig"..... "think globally act locally".... "save the whales.. the trees... the poor african kids!!".... "drop out of school and rebell against your parents".... "Dad's are scum.... mum's are cool".... "go vegetarian" "the ufo's are comming!!" .... "don't teach kids math's and reading!!!!!..... you elitist pig!!!.... they need to learn to build a veggie patch and learn to recycle and wear gender nuetral clothes!!!" "we can all eat other's cuisines and enjoy each others religions from every nation in one smelting pot of peoples and get along together and intermarry"

Political incorrect guy., Urban Dictionary 33 Comments [10/26/2015 2:23:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 113881

[Hyperlink in original]

We have another alleged “honor killing” in Europe. Rokstan M. is a woman who was gang raped by three Syrian soldiers and fled for freedom in the West. Her family however treated her as unclean and guilty for being gang raped. She reportedly feared being killed by her father and brothers. The young pregnant woman was found stabbed to death and her Syrian father is believed to have fled back to Syria. Police are also seeking her brothers who are believed to have participated in the savage murder. Rokstan wrote on social media shortly before her death that “I am awaiting death. But I am too young to die.”

Rokstan was employed as an interpreter on a book project on Syrian refugees. She recounted before her death that “I was taken by three men. Ever since that time my family has regarded me as unclean. My mother and my brothers mistreat me. They say that I deserve to die.” She lived at Papatya, a crisis center for girls and young women and the director, Eva Kaiser, believes Rokstan was killed by her family “because she was no longer a virgin and was raped in Syria.”

Her body was found behind a living area for Syrian refugees in Berlin. The father appears to have fled to Turkey and likely back to Syria — leaving his wife who is under investigation in Germany. The mother denies involvement but friends of the Rokstan say that the mother threatened her and once allegedly tried to hire a hitman to kill her.

Rokstan M.'s father, mother and brothers, Jonathan Turley 41 Comments [10/26/2015 3:40:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 113877

Yesterday, Donald Trump told Fox Business Channel that he would “ absolutely” support shutting down mosques in America in order to fight ISIS, so naturally American Family Radio’s Bryan Fischer came to the Republican presidential candidate’s defense today, repeating his frequent assertion that the First Amendment applies only to Christians.

“So the question is, can you close down a mosque in the United States of America given the First Amendment and its guarantee of the free exercise of religion,” Fischer said, “and the answer is that you absolutely can. Yes, Donald, yes, Virginia, we can constitutionally close down mosques in the United States of America.”

This is, he explained, because “the only religious tradition that is being explicitly and expressly protected in the First Amendment is the free exercise of the Christian religion.”

Donald Trump and Bryan Fischer, Right Wing Watch 84 Comments [10/26/2015 3:15:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: Giveitaday

Quote# 113867

Based on the marked proliferation of press reports coming out of the world’s developed nations and the statements of government officials therein, it appears as though nearly everyone except for the American citizenry (or at least average American news consumers) are aware that members of our government and their powerful confederates engaged in a far-reaching international money-laundering scheme dedicated to financing Islamic terrorists abroad.

It also remains unknown to fat, happy Americans on the proverbial hamster wheel that dozens of government, military and intelligence personnel have either been harassed, prosecuted and/or imprisoned by our government for attempting to bring its illegal activities (terrorist funding and illegal domestic surveillance among them) to light.

Finally, among many quite verifiable charges of which most Americans appear to have extremely limited knowledge include that the White House:
•first clandestinely, then later with the cooperation of members of Congress, supplied funds, training and weaponry to Islamic terrorists abroad, including the ISIS (or Islamic State) group;
•catalyzed the 2011 “Arab Spring” and the downfall of standing governments in Egypt and Libya;
•was singularly responsible for the rise of the brutal and genocidal regime of Muslim Brotherhood thug Mohamed Morsi to power in Egypt;
•utilized the U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya, as a way station for the illegal transportation of weapons to Islamist groups in Syria, subsequently either allowing the facility to be attacked on Sept. 11, 2012, or bringing about said attack in order to obliterate evidence of this treason;
•is currently conducting an elaborate counterfeit military campaign against ISIS in Iraq and Syria, which it in fact supports;
•has used the aforementioned counterfeit military campaign to spawn chaos within the region, thereby compounding the current orchestrated “refugee crisis” in Europe, which the administration clearly desires to expand to the continental United States for the purpose of further destabilizing America domestically;
•facilitated the rise of nationalist neo-Nazis to power in Ukraine in 2013, in violation of the Constitution and international law (but in keeping with its Hitlerian character and objectives), and to this end engaged in widespread black operations, counterintelligence programs and campaigns of murder calculated to destabilize Ukraine and implicate the Russian government;
•is attempting to frame recent military action on the part of the Russian government in support of Syria (the only one to have damaged ISIS and stemmed its momentum) as Russian aggression and interference in the region.

[...]

Slowly, the truth is being unearthed for the world to see, and this is that Barack Hussein Obama and his Cabinet, past and present, are war criminals of a particularly malevolent order.

In the interest of restoring the republic however, it is imperative that Obama and his sordid pantheon of demons are not allowed to cheerfully pass the torch to the next equally corrupt administration in January 2017. They all must be brought to justice, and in a very public way, whatever the cost.

Erik Rush, WND 20 Comments [10/26/2015 2:48:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 113863

Check out "The Evidence Bible" here: http://bit.ly/evidence-bible



Ray Comfort, Ray Comfort's Facebook page 48 Comments [10/26/2015 2:44:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 113862

You know very well that the MUSLIM TERRORIST NATURALIZED INDONESIAN CITIZEN BARRY SOETORO AKA BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA (BORN IN KENYA) is the MAIN RESPONSIBLE for all the CHAOS, not only in the United States, but all over the world. He created the CHAOS to make it easyer for the ISLAMIC TERRORISTS to control every corner of this planet. DO NOT PLAY GAMES WITH THE TRUTH! There are many intelligent people that you can not fool.

coura, WND 35 Comments [10/26/2015 2:44:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 113860

The most popular Bible version is the satanic New International Version (NIV). But even worse is the Easy-To-Read Version (ERV). At least the corrupt NIV retains the word “virgin” in Isaiah 7:14, but the ERV completely removes this important theological word . . .

KING JAMES BIBLE (KJB) — Isaiah 7:14, “Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.” [emphasis added]

EASY-TO-READ VERSION (ERV) — Isaiah 7:14, “But the Lord will still show you this sign: The young woman is pregnant and will give birth to a son. She will name him Immanuel.” [emphasis added]

WICKEDNESS!!! A young woman is pregnant? That says nothing! The ERV removes Christ's virgin birth. My friend, BILLIONS of young women have been pregnant since 700 B.C. when this prophecy by Isaiah was proclaimed and written down. How ridiculous and retarded is the ERV to say that, “The young woman is pregnant.” Seriously? Is that a prophecy? Is the Bible really prophesying that the sign of the Lord will be a pregnant woman? The “Easy-To-Read” Bible version (ERV) is of the Devil, making no sense at all. According to Isaiah 7:14 in the “Easy-To-Read” Bible version (ERV), the promised sign from God proving that His Word is true, will be a pregnant woman. What a sad joke! Ah, but the faithful King James Bible (KJB) says the sign from the Lord will be that, “A VIRGIN SHALL CONCEIVE.” Mary was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus.

Did you know that the ungodly Jewish so-called “holy book,” THE TALMUD, teaches that a Roman soldier brutally raped Mary, and that's how Jesus was born? Clearly, The Talmud, a satanic piece of filth, vehemently denies the virgin birth of Jesus Christ. When foolish Christians support modern-day apostate Israel, which was formed by the Illuminati, you are supporting The Talmud upon which their Judaism (a false religion) is based. Judaism adamantly rejects Jesus as the Messiah. According to 1st John 2:22-23, that makes followers of Judaism “liars” and “antichrists.” Today's Judaism is not the Judaism (the Jew's religion) of the Old Testament. Modern Judaism is a satanic religion, rooted in the occult teachings of Kaballah. This is also true of Mormonism and Freemasonry, which are all connected. No Christian ought to praise, support nor admire present-day satanic Israel—a cruel Illuminati deception! Mormonism, Judaism, Freemasonry and Kaballah are all ENEMIES of the cross of the Lord Jesus Christ.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 34 Comments [10/26/2015 2:43:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 113859

Lessons from Back to the Future

Today, October 21, 2015, is the day that Marty McFly, the hero of the popular 1989 movie Back to the Future Part II, arrives on after he travels to the future. Although we don’t yet have flying, time-traveling DeLoreans, or self-adjusting and drying clothes, we don’t know if the Chicago Cubs will win baseball’s World Series this month, and our hoverboards today can barely get off the ground, we at AiG do have a great time-traveling adventure in store for you.

In our online store we have a movie that features time travel but teaches an important lesson. This film, called Time Changer, is set in 1890 and features a Bible professor looking to receive unanimous endorsement from the board for a new book he wrote. But one board member won’t endorse it because he believes the views in the book are dangerous for future generations. He then sends Carlisle into the 21st century to see where his ideas will lead. This movie is described as a humorous “conversation starter” on biblical authority and why it is so important that we stand on the authority of God’s Word without compromise. You can learn more about this faith-affirming movie.

Now, many secularists will argue against biblical creation by saying that we have a “time travel” problem. The supposed problem goes like this: there are some galaxies that are so far away it would take light from their stars billions of years to reach Earth. Now, they say, since we can see them, their light has already arrived here, and so the Earth can’t be only thousands of years old, it must be billions. But, creation astronomers and astrophysicists have researched this question and have posed several ways to explain it in a biblical worldview. You can read more about proposed solutions and assumptions inherent in the argument.

Actually, this is a poor argument to use for those who hold to the big bang to use because it’s self-refuting—they have a similar problem! You see, in the big bang model light has to travel farther than is possible in even 14 billion years. You see, according to the big bang model, at the beginning the universe would develop different temperatures in different places in the universe. But everywhere we measure, the universe has the same temperature—even in the most distant galaxies. In order for all of the different places of the universe to reach a uniform temperature, light had to be exchanged from one place to another. But, even in the supposed 14 billion years that those who hold to the big bang believe in, there hasn’t been enough time for light to travel from one side of the universe to the other. So for those who hold to the big bang to argue that biblical creation is wrong because of this “time travel” problem, they are really “shooting themselves in the foot” because their argument is self-refuting!

Although we can’t time travel like Marty McFly, we do know Someone who created everything and is outside of time and even created time, as stated in Genesis 1:1. Since we have the testimony of the Creator God of the universe, which is the written account of the history of the world, we can be confident that the things it says are true. His Word tells us how everything came to be, how sin entered into the world, and how Jesus Christ's sacrifice on the Cross takes away the penalty of that sin. It even tells us of the future glory of timeless heaven, for those who are Christians.

Thanks for stopping by and thanks for praying,
Ken

This item was written with the assistance of AiG’s research team.

Ken Ham, Answers in Genesis 36 Comments [10/25/2015 4:57:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 113858

The topic is don't be naked in your own house because jinn might be there watching you.

I was watching one of the "diary of an exorcist videos" and in the video the guy said that a kid was playing football with his mates and apparently what happened was that he threw something and it hit a jinn and killed it, So that jinns father/mother wanted revenge, So the jinn entered his body and then you know what happens next....

So yes we should be careful.

umar, Ummah 48 Comments [10/25/2015 4:51:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Mister Spak
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 16 | top