Quote# 103689

Blood test for gay invented in Kazakhstan.

“We have stooped so low that LGBTs no longer hide their orientation. One can see a lot of people in the city’s malls and other public places — these are young people in coloured pants. This means they no longer hide their (sexual) orientation. I think it is very easy to identify a gay person by his or her DNA. A blood test can show the presence of degeneratism in a person,” Dauren Babamuratov, the leader of the Kazakh national movement, said…

Dauren Babamuratov, Religion Dispatches 22 Comments [9/25/2014 3:12:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Mister Spak

Quote# 103679

[An Ugandan newspaper published the names of the country's "top 200 homosexuals." A commenter compared it to Nazi newspapers publishing the names of Jews.]

How are they REMOTELY similar? The government of Uganda has criminalized abhorrent behavior, and I commend them - this newspaper is 'outing' criminals, if mafia thugs were 'outed' in your city would you care?

Texas_Eli, Vos iz Neias 37 Comments [9/24/2014 3:28:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 39

Quote# 103678

1) [Homosexuality] is a very severe disorder. It is difficult to cure but if the victim (or perpetrator, if you wish) is willing to change, he can.

2) It surely does affect all our lives because it radically transforms the society around us, namely, the most important institution of this society. If this infection is allowed to spread, unless you are very protective of your children, they will grow up into the world where asking a teenager "whom do you want to marry what you grow up - a man or a woman?" will be a very legitimate question.

3) Torah is emes [truth], and it has the promise that eventually the whole world will recognize it. Ultimately, that is the purpose of Jew's life - to make that day come closer. And for sure there is an imperative trying to resist the world's regressing and taking steps backwards.

Rafuel, Vos iz Neias 32 Comments [9/24/2014 3:28:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 24
Submitted By:

Quote# 103677

[This comment is referring to an incident where ultra-Orthodox Jews threw stones at an Arab student studying in Israel.]

Arabs get killed for selling land to Jews - where are the complaints there?

Let the Jews act like a people with cojones for once and do what G-d wants them to do instead of playing ostrich.

"But if you will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass that those whom you allow to remain shall be as thorns in your eyes, and stings in your sides, and shall distress you in the land where you dwell". A verse in Parshat Masay.

A grosse yasher koach [big thank you] to anyone who threw the stones.

skazm, Vos iz Neias 22 Comments [9/24/2014 3:28:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 21
Submitted By:

Quote# 103670

God is the most bigoted, narrow-minded, opinionated person in the universe. The dictionary defines a “bigot” as, “a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from his own.” Well, that makes God the ultimate bigot of all then, because it's His way or the Highway to Hell.

David J. Stewart, Jesus-is-Savior.com 59 Comments [9/24/2014 3:07:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 33
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 103665

Satan has us so deluded about death that we’ve decided it’s rude to tell the truth about it. Imagine if you piped up at a funeral and said: “You know that she’s probably in Hell, right? So instead of talking about how wonderful she was, let’s talk about how we can avoid ending up there ourselves.” Can you imagine the furious reaction you’d receive from the family? Do you see how effectively Satan has got us all stifling the truth? Talking about the truth is considered rude, inappropriate, and obnoxious. But treating death like a choose-your-own-ending situation? That’s considered polite and right. And while we sit around avoiding the H-word, more and more souls are refusing to see death as the terrifying thing that it is if you haven’t gotten right with your Creator

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 44 Comments [9/24/2014 3:06:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 27

Quote# 103664

We do not go into the medical profession to save lives, but to serve God. Whether our patients live or die, we will be glorifying Him when we are relying on Him as our only Source of wisdom. If we are surgeons, we trust that God will guide our hands. We remember that the power to save a life is never placed within our grasp for even a moment. It is God who saves lives, and we surrender the hands He gave us to be instruments that honor Him. When patients recover and people applaud us, we see their praise as the misdirected thing it is and we give God all the glory in our hearts.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 42 Comments [9/24/2014 3:06:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 22

Quote# 103662

One of God’s most defining Characteristics is His massive ego. God loves Himself, and He never gets enough of exalting Himself. Everything He does has some Self-serving motivation behind it. God doesn’t create or sustain anything that doesn’t benefit Him in some way.

You are a human. God has designed you with a special ability to bond with Him. He wants to have a personal relationship with you—a joyful soul communion that will continue to deepen for all of eternity. But for this to be possible, there must be some degree of understanding on your side. Making you a selfish, egocentric being was an essential part of God’s plan to draw you closer to Himself.

If you’re going to know God, you need to understand what it means to want the whole universe to revolve around you, because this is what God wants. You need to understand what it’s like to think you’re better than everyone else and that everything you do is justified, because this is how God thinks. Now of course when you think such lofty things about yourself, you’re being delusional, and you will have to be taught better. But your intimate understanding of selfishness is priceless and that is not something that God wants you to grow past. If you did, how would you be able to really grasp what He means when He says that He is the most magnificent Being in the universe and that He is looking forward to the day when every knee bows before Him? If you were not a selfish being, you’d have no clue what He was talking about. You wouldn’t understand His obsession with glory or His outrage when someone worships another being in His place. If you don’t understand the concept of selfishness—really understand it—then you and God would have a very limited relationship. But because God created you with a massive ego and an inability to do anything without a self-serving motive, a wonderful foundation of identity is now available for God to build on. So then, on the one hand, it’s not good to be selfish. It tempts you to make bad choices and it makes it much harder for you to submit to God in the way that He demands. But on the other hand, it’s a wonderful thing to be selfish, for once you do submit to God, you have a much better chance of really knowing Him. All things considered, your ego is one of the greatest gifts God has given you, for it opens the door to a world of understanding that you would never have access to if you’d been designed differently.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 48 Comments [9/24/2014 3:05:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 21

Quote# 103661

God gives love only when it benefits Him to do so. This means that if we are to love like God, we want to also give love only when it benefits God for us to do so. How do we know when God is no longer interested in loving someone? We don’t unless He tells us. But right off we can identify one group of souls who God no longer loves: those who have already died without submitting to Him on earth. This means that if we are to please God in the way that we love, we need to also stop loving those who have died without submitting to Him. To pray for God to have mercy on souls who died without ever submitting to Him is wrong. When we ask God to keep loving souls who defied Him on earth, we are ignoring the fact that His love is conditional and we are disrespecting His boundaries. This is insulting behavior which far too many Christians are caught up in. If someone dies without submitting to God, our attitude should be “they deserve what they get.” Does this sound merciless? It should, because God is merciless in eternity towards those who defied Him on earth.

There’s nothing more obnoxious than thinking we can out love God or top Him in the departments of mercy and grace. So when we sit around weeping over the idea of souls burning in Hell and blast Heaven with prayers to for God to be kind to those who spat in His face their entire lives, we are not acting like Christ, nor are we impressing His Father. Instead, we are insulting Them both for all three of our Creators are pro-Hell and will shed no tears whatsoever for those who end up there. Who is it that is kicking back in Heaven enjoying the smoke of the torment of souls writhing in anguish in Revelation? It’s Jesus—our loving Lord who is a lot more things than just love (Rev. 14:9-11). And who is it that finds it satisfying to lead the souls in Heaven out to take a look at all the souls rotting in the torment of His wrath? Yahweh (Isa. 66:22-24). We would be wise to take heed of Jesus’ warning:

“I’ll show you the One you should be afraid of. Be afraid of the One who has the power to throw you into Hell after killing you. I’m warning you to be afraid of Him.” (Luke 12:5)

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 22 Comments [9/24/2014 3:05:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 22

Quote# 103660

Not evolve but devolve. For example Noah had on the ark a pair of horse type animals. These two contained combinations of dna that gave rise to all the different types of horse like animal we have today. This is not evolution as the animals are not becoming more advanced than the original but devolution as they have less potential than before. I'm not sure I've explained this very well there is a very good book called "true science agrees with the Bible" that has a chapter dedicated to explaining this. It is entirely plausible that all the different species we have today could have devolved from the number of animals that would have fitted in an ark of the dimensions given in the Bible. Whether or not you believe is up to you but I would suggest that if you look into it properly the evidence supports the Bible as a reliable historical record.

Andchips, Daily Mail  30 Comments [9/24/2014 3:05:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 24

Quote# 103658

[This is from an article titled "What's Wrong With Liberals?"]

Today they dominate the government at every level, the Democrat Party, the courts, the schools, the universities, the news media, Hollywood, and every other aspect of the public sector you can think of - even quite a few of the churches. There are still a few religious leaders, political commentators, bloggers, and a handful of politicians who oppose them: but have you seen the opposition winning many battles lately? There are Newswithviews readers who now believe the Left is invincible in this fallen world, and will only be defeated with the return of Jesus Christ.

You'd think the progs would be happy, riding high as they are, abusing Christians to their hearts' content, running the show however they please. You'd think they wouldn't even notice the few small voices raised against them.

And yet they aren't happy. The most trivial act or word of dissent enrages them. They have conniptions over it.

Why?

Well, the Bible tells us Satan is unhappy - filled with wrath, because he knows he has only a short time left to run wild on the earth (Revelation 12:12). Sound like anyone you know?

When the devil is angry and unhappy, his servants are angry and unhappy.

With all the work they've done on Global Warming, for instance, nature refuses to cooperate and most people have noticed that. Libs 'n' progs love Global Warming! It's their ticket to global governance. "Deniers" must be crushed.

They push Evolution for all they're worth, and still a lot of people aren't buying it. Libs 'n' progs love Evolution: it gets God out of the picture, leaving the path clear for their own creation and idol, the devouring state, to be supreme. But somehow they just can't seem to nail it down.

It's the same story with all the rest of their comprehensive program of social engineering - same-sex pseudomarriage, all that "transgender" business, forcible redistribution of wealth, redefinition of the family, and the dissolution of all the nations into some icky kind of world government. They just can't close the deal.

[...]

As long as there is any opposition at all, leftists refuse to feel secure.

Lee Duigon, Barb Wire 31 Comments [9/23/2014 3:31:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 24
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 103654

I really wish your guess was correct, but unfortunately it is not. I have come from a generational background with Illuminati ties through several family bloodlines.

Most of my family served in a different division, with out the deep involvement in the dark brotherhood. I know people who were part of that side and one of my own sons was a victim of Satanic ritualistic abuse.

Though I don't personally know Lauren Stratford, I have had help indirectly from her through a couple of her close friend's, Randolf and Johanna Michaelsen.

When I was trying to break free of the evil organization Someone gave me a copy of Johanna's book, "The Beautiful Side of Evil". I read the book..not with out difficulty. Especially toward the end of the book, my house came under demonic attack with simultaneous poundings and beatings all coming from the outer walls of the house. Even the windows were being beat upon to the point that I thought they would break. I struggled through the book and said the prayer provided at the end of the book. Instantly I felt the heavy black blanket of oppression lift off of me and leave! The poundings ceased, and I thanked God. I knew that God was there for me and He would keep me safe.

Wanting to thank Johanna for writing her book, I wrote her a letter. I never expected to hear from her, But I did. I don't remember if she wrote me first or called me first. She wanted to see how my family and I were doing. We kept in touch for a few years. I am very thankful for the time she and her husband took out of their busy schedule to counsel me and pray with me and for my family. Johanna was also very helpful during the time I was literally fighting to save my son's life who was being ritualistically abused. That was 22 years ago! To know my son today, you would never believe his past. He is truly a miracle! I am soooo thankful!!!! I thank God regularly for this miracle and for all those who have stood in the gap for my family and me. We make it a point to stay close to God. Psalm 91.

Carolyn Hamlett, christian-forum.net 29 Comments [9/23/2014 3:30:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 24
Submitted By: Tony

Quote# 103651

One of the stock objections to the Resurrection is that Jesus didn’t appear to more people. But the problem with this objection is that infidels will always move the goalpost.

1. Suppose Jesus appeared to Pilate. Suppose we had an ostensible firsthand account of his appearance to Pilate.

How would infidels respond? Their first resort would be to deny the authenticity of the account. It must be a 2C forgery, or something like that.

And they know it couldn’t be authentic since dead men don’t return from the grave. So you have a circular denial.

2. But suppose the account was authenticated. How would infidels respond?

i) Their next resort would be to ask rhetorically, What’s more likely: that Jesus really did appear to Pilate, or that Pilate lied, or hallucinated, or we have a case of mistaken identity, &c.?

ii) They’d add that ancient witnesses can’t be trusted. They’re so superstitious, you know. So that feeds into their confirmation bias. They see what they expect to see. Things that go bump in the night.

3. Suppose Jesus appeared on national TV. How would the infidel respond?

He might says: What’s more likely: that dead men return from the grave, or that his television appearance was a computer-animated illusion?

4. Suppose Jesus made a personal appearance to the infidel? How would he respond?

i) He might say, How do I know it’s Jesus? What does Jesus look like, anyway? And it’s not like I can do a DNA match.

ii) Or he might say, What’s more likely: that dead men return from the grave, or that I had a hypnagogic hallucination?

iii) Or he might say, Even a space alien impersonating Jesus is more likely than Jesus appearing to me. At least space aliens, if they exist, are naturally possible. And any naturalistic explanation, however unlikely, is more likely than any supernaturalistic explanation like a miracle (i.e. the Resurrection).

steve, Triablogue 38 Comments [9/23/2014 3:27:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 103650

There is no truth whatsoever in the second half of the above paragraph: "If you examine secular societies in comparison to religious societies; secular societies will consistently have less crime, unemployment, corruption and more freedom, share of wealth and a higher standard of living." The Refiner's Fire CHALLENGES the author to prove that statement!

Look at the U.S. in general, at what has happened since 1962 since "God" and prayer were removed from public schools and government buildings! Since then, things have become more secular, worse, and that is a proven fact! Do a Google search and you'll see the U.S. has the highest level of teenage drug abuse in any industrialized nation as well as the highest divorce rate. We are the world's largest manufacturer of beer and the third greatest consumer of alcohol per capita. The U.S. has some of the world's most liberal abortion laws, despite the many "pro-life" protests. Furthermore, organized, public prayer in our schools is against the law, but yet our children's textbooks honor Buddha and Mohammed! Magazines that would make the proverbial sailor blush appear on our grocery check-out lines for our children to see! Many American states have annual "gay" parades, and "gays" are now fighting for the right to marry - and our own President supports their cause!

"One nation under God"? Perhaps at one time, but not anymore.

Carmen, The Refiner's Fire 38 Comments [9/23/2014 3:27:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 103649

Without God, a collection of subjective preferences based on the personal opinions and desires of the collective whole of society and the declared moral truth that unnecessary suffering is wrong, is the best that can be offered without God. But, ultimately, it fails because it is subjective, not universal. If you think it is universal because all people don't like unnecessary suffering, then think again. There are people who prefer unnecessary suffering. The mentally ill, for example. Are they wrong for preferring it? If you say it's okay for them, then the moral is not universal since it doesn't apply to them. If you say it's not okay for them, then you are imposing of value on others and what gives you the right to do that in a subjective world?


Matt Slick, CARM 26 Comments [9/23/2014 3:26:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 103647

I forgot to mention that I personally believe Obama is not circumcised. His comfort in his own skin and obvious self-confidence, which is not manufactured or desperate, is what I imagine would likely be the case for an intact man. I could be wrong, but if I am found to be wrong I will be very surprised. As Hugh7 said in July, Obama’s father’s people, the Luo, don’t believe in circumcision even though they are Muslim (this is part of the conflict in Kenya), so it seems possible that he might have influenced Obama’s liberal -thinking mother not to let the doctor’s cut Obama. I hope so. And I hope we live to see the day when this incredibly traumatic, brutal, and damaging practice is made punishable by life sentences, hanging, or exile to a melting iceberg.

Robert, Last Blog on Earth 32 Comments [9/23/2014 3:25:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 103644

The rock duo, t.A.T.u. became famous for the video of their single, All The Things She Said, which features a memorable same-sex (neither woman is actually a lesbian) kiss in the rain. (left) Now one of the members has revealed she is actually a raging homophobe.

Citing an interview which has since been removed from YouTube, the pop-culture site Refinery 29 reports Yulia Volkova as saying she would never accept a gay son.

"Yes, I would condemn him, because I believe that a real man must be a real man. God created man for procreation, it is the nature. The man for me is the support, the strength male voice, male look. Definitely no, I won't support a gay son."

The stunned interviewer reacted, saying:

"Stop, stop. You just told me that you do not mind if your daughter was a lesbian. You were talking about freedom."

But Yulia doubled down:

"This only applies to a daughter, not a son. I think for men, it's a bad freedom. A man has no right to be a fag. Two girls together, not the same thing as the two men together. It seems to me that lesbians look aesthetically much nicer than two men holding their hands or kissing."

The amazing part of the interview is that Yulia insists she isn't homophobic. She explains it's just that she wants her son "to be a real man, not a fag." She finished by saying:

"Being gay is still better than murderers, thieves, or drug addicts. If you choose out of all this, being gay is better than the rest."

Yulia Volkova, New Civil Rights Movement 28 Comments [9/23/2014 3:24:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 22

Quote# 103642

Some basic facts on heterosexuality:
Heterosexuality is compulsory, that is we are psychologically conditioned (through propaganda) and physically forced into it (through sexual harassment, rape, marriage and pimping). This is one of the very basic tenets of radical feminism. Compulsory means the opposite of choice. By definition women never choose to be owned by a man, and the only free choice we can make is to resist hetero-captivity by becoming separatist, lesbian or celibate.

Heterosexuality is the system which guarantees each man sexual access to a woman and exclusive ownership over her so he can rape, impregnate and use her as his personal breeder and domestic slave. It’s the foundational institution of patriarchal oppression, on which all patriarchal institutions – economic, state, medical, religious, military, etc – are built on.

witchwind, radical wind 28 Comments [9/23/2014 3:23:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 27
Submitted By: What?

Quote# 103639

I was mainly speaking of male homosexuality. It is disturbing not only because it was forbidden, but also because it's just disturbing. I mean really? Really? It's actually natural for women to be somewhat attracted to each other, but men? Really? I literally thought it was a joke when I was first told about it...then come to find out that it's real...wow. If you don't think it's disturbing, then there's something wrong, either that or society is more influencial than I thought it was.

I'm only against male homosexuality, the Scriptures say nothing about women though it's strongly suggested that women marry (it's mostly against pure lesbianism in that case, then again the Scriptures never actually say anyone needs to get married).

It's the penetrating member that's the problem, a woman has no way of actually having Scriptural intercourse with another woman, so therefore they're free in that respect. My question is why can't this opinion be respected?

Shinobi Train, Naruto Base 52 Comments [9/22/2014 3:19:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 36
Submitted By: Menomaru

Quote# 103636

In an interview with Cleveland Right to Life’s Molly Smith earlier this month, Mission America President Linda Harvey claimed that LGBT youth centers are in fact “homosexual sex centers” where “kids are being preyed upon by older homosexuals” and contracting HIV.

Harvey reported that LGBT teens at these centers “go and socialize with out homosexuals who are college-age and some of the volunteers who are out homosexuals” which leads her to believe that “kids are being preyed upon by older homosexuals.”

“The things that go on in the bathrooms at these centers…It’s unbelievable. It’s everything you can imagine” she said.

“Social service agencies donate money because, again, it’s considered a youth center. No, it’s a homosexual sex center and kids should not be involved in this. This is another way HIV is being spread, I think. There’s no question that kids are being preyed upon by older homosexuals, and that’s why you see Centers for Disease Control shows 13- to 24-year-old HIV rates are going up.”

Linda Harvey, Right Wing Watch 40 Comments [9/22/2014 3:10:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: Zagen30

Quote# 103635

If you are considering voting for the Libertarian candidate in any Senate election, please send me your name and address so I can track you down and drown you.

Ann Coulter, Townhall.com 48 Comments [9/22/2014 3:09:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 32
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 103634

To explain how evolution is impossible, let's take for example an XBOX 360. Let's give it a female counterpart for good luck. If you put them in a house full of food and fresh water, and then give them millions of years, do you think they will ever give birth to a Play Station 3?

No, of course not. The same impossibility applies to any animal today. If you take two dogs, and let them breed for millions of years, are they ever going to produce a non-dog? Like a bird, or a chimpanzee? No, of course not. They will always give birth to a dog.

Here's another example:

Now, my wife is black, and I am white. And the odds of her giving birth to a child... that has wings... is slim to none. Now, in evolution the change has to be beneficial to the species. And flying would be a great benefit. But that's impossible... UNLESS... WE TRY OVER AND OVER AGAIN FOR MILLIONS OF YEARS!

Yes, that's it! The magic formula for evolution is MILLIONS OF YEARS!

We can clearly see from these two examples that evolution is impossible. There is absolutely no logical proof for evolution.

Brian Price, Value of Truth 55 Comments [9/22/2014 3:09:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 38
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 103631

[Pat Robertson loses his shit when the Air Force no longer requires recruits say "So help me God" when swearing oath]

TV preacher Pat Robertson lashed out at a “Jewish radical” on Thursday who he said was responsible for God being removed from the Air Force oath.

The Air Force announced on Thursday that the words “so help me God” were an optional part of the oath after an atheist airman crossed out the words on his reenlistment paperwork. Military officials had initially refused to accept the paperwork, but Department of Defense General Counsel eventually ruled that the words could be omitted.

Although the American Humanist Association had represented the airman, Robertson on Thursday blamed Military Religious Freedom Foundation President Mikey Weinstein for the movement against religion in the armed services.

“There’s a left-wing radical named Mikey Weinstein who has got a group about people against religion or whatever he calls it, and he has just terrorized the armed forces,” Robertson opined. “You think you’re supposed to be tough, you’re supposed to defend us, and you got one little Jewish radical who is scaring the pants off of you.”

“You want these guys flying the airplanes to defend us when you got one little guy terrorizing them?” he asked. “That’s what it amounts to.”

Pat Robertson, Raw Story 34 Comments [9/22/2014 3:06:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 19

Quote# 103626

If God were not logical, and if the Bible really did have any inconsistencies, then what would be the basis for saying that inconsistency is wrong? The law of non-contradiction is epistemologically rooted in the self-consistent nature of God. There is no rational basis for it otherwise. Thus, to accuse something of being wrong on the basis of inconsistency is to assume the truth of the Christian worldview

Jason Lisle, Jason Lisle's blog 30 Comments [9/22/2014 3:02:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: Tony

Quote# 103625

Marilyn Monroe sold her soul to Satan, stripping naked and leading an entire nation into adultery. It was her sensual role in the 1954 filthy movie, THE SEVEN YEAR ITCH, that led her divorce to baseball player Joe DiMaggio. Godless movie producers used a big floor fan to blow Marilyn's dress up over her head, completely exposing her private area for all the lustful men to never forget and film from different angle's. Her husband Joe DiMaggio was very upset with her for giving to other men what belongs only to him, that is, her body. Monroe's disloyalty to her husband, vows and marriage is awful. On her wedding day, a wife vows to keep her self only for her husband for as long as she shall live (and vise versa). Americans are such liars!

Sinfully regarding her career more than her husband (same as Sandra Bullock), Monroe filed for divorce several months later over the incident and quit her marriage (NO HUSBAND WAS GOING TO TELL MARILYN WHAT TO DO!!!). So she left, abandoned and ruined his life. Poor Joe!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 32 Comments [9/22/2014 3:02:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 23