1 2 3 4 5 10 11 | bottom
Quote# 103007

In the wake of the Supreme Court ruling in its favor, the town of Greece, New York issued a new policy that will bar atheists from delivering opening invocations at city functions, the Center for Inquiry (CFI) reports.

According to the new policy, “[t]he invocation shall be voluntarily delivered by an appointed representative of an Assemblies List for the Town of Greece.” That list will be compiled by the clerk of the town board, and will consist of “assemblies with an established presence in the Town of Greece that regularly meet for the primary purpose of sharing a religious perspective.”

This policy dictates that no group lacking a “religious perspective” will be allowed onto the “Assemblies List,” which means that speakers who lack such perspectives will not be eligible to deliver opening invocations. The “Assemblies List” will consist of “all ‘churches,’ ‘synagogues,’ ‘congregations,’ ‘temples,’ ‘mosques’ or other religious assemblies in the Town of Greece” — meaning that the policy specifically excludes anyone who does not participate in a “religious assembly” from delivering an opening invocation.

The Town Board justified its decision by noting that “our country’s Founders recognized that we possess certain rights that cannot be awarded, surrendered, nor corrupted by human power, and the Founders explicitly attributed the origins of these, our inalienable rights, to a Creator.” The policy does not “show a purposeful preference of one religious view over another,” because it does not permit “the faith of the person delivering the invocation to be considered when extending an invitation[.]”

However, it does require that the person invited have a faith, which as the Center For Inquiry’s CEO Ronald A. Lindsay noted, “in effect, bar[s] the nonreligious from delivering invocations.” Lindsay also noted that in the town’s decision violated the spirit of the Supreme Court ruling, in which Justice Kennedy, writing for the majority, wrote that he hoped Greece “would welcome a prayer by any minister or layman who wished to give one.”

Using a similar justification, a Florida city council also banned all non-religious individuals from delivering opening invocations at public functions.

Town Board of Greece, New York, Raw Story 29 Comments [8/28/2014 2:49:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 103004

“I personally believe in Jesus Christ as my lord and savior, but I’m also a killer,” said officer Dan Page, a 35-year veteran, in the video. “I’ve killed a lot. And if I need to, I’ll kill a whole bunch more. If you don’t want to get killed, don’t show up in front of me. I have no problems with it. God did not raise me to be a coward." Page added, “I’m into diversity — I kill everybody. I don’t care."


Dan Page, Yahoo News 49 Comments [8/27/2014 4:46:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 34
Submitted By: Wesley

Quote# 103003

No matter how many people you talk to about your Christian faith you will never find more than three categories for why people reject the offer of the gospel. Those three reasons are Intellectual, Emotional and Volitional.

Intellectual: Some people you talk to about Christ will not accept what you are saying on account of the fact that they don’t find Christianity intellectually viable. Their understanding of science or philosophy or history does not accord with Christianity or their perception of Christianity. Perhaps they believe the existence of evil/suffering makes the Christian idea of God impossible or their commitment to science and the belief in philosophical naturalism makes them reject the possibility of Jesus’ resurrection. Their worldview is fundamentally incompatible with Christianity and therefore they reject it. This is true not just of Atheism but of any worldview which collides with the Christian worldview including other religions like Islam or Hinduism, etc.

Emotional: Some people will reject Christianity for irrational reasons and their objection is purely emotional. That is to say they don’t have an intellectual issue such as thinking there is insufficient evidence to believe God exists or that Jesus rose from the dead, but perhaps they have been hurt by someone who was a Christian and this has poisoned the well. They were cheated by a business man who claimed to be a Christian, abused by a caregiver who claimed to be a Christian, or they grew up in church and saw a lot of hypocrisy. None of this is evaluative of the intellectual validity of Christianity, but they don’t want anything to do with it because they’ve been emotionally jaded to it.

Volitional: Some people will not accept Christianity simply because they don’t want to. It’s not that they don’t think Christianity is intellectually viable, and it’s not that they’ve had a particularly bad experience that has turned them off to Christianity, rather, they know that Christianity would require more from them than they want to give. Becoming a Christian requires devotion to God and actively attending a church and they’d rather sleep in on Sundays and spend their time otherwise engaged with things that interest them more. Christianity may be true, but becoming a Christian would mean having to stop sleeping with their girlfriend outside of marriage, or even to give money to the church or poor people. In many cases this group has religion on the backburner; they’ll get to it, just maybe later when it’s more convenient.

[...]

Above all, each category of person needs prayer. The overarching reason people reject the Christian message is because of their own depravity. They are dead in their trespasses and sin (Ephesians 2:1-10) and they do not seek for God (Romans 3:10-12) and the have exchanged the truth about God for a lie (Romans 1:18-32) and Satan has blinded their minds (2 Corinthian 4:4). God commands out apologetics effort (1 Peter 3:15) and he uses that as he draws people to himself. But ultimately people’s condition, no matter how it gets expressed, Intellectual, emotional or volitional, is a bi-product of their depravity. So pray for them, always start and end with the gospel, and try to address them where they are at.

Jacob Allee, Apologetics 35 Comments [8/27/2014 4:42:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 102998

Let me tell you, today Zionism is the second hide of colonialism. Colonialism is the hide of Zionism. Zionism has crept into the hide of Israel. Israel has taken a new form in our country, and has appeared as Baha'ism. In all the ministries and key of offices of the Shi'ite Islamic government, to which a great deal of hail and praise is due, and all of its authorities are protectors of Islam, [the Baha'is] have infiltrated everywhere.

Ayatullah Sayyid Mahmud Taleqani, A-Islam 13 Comments [8/27/2014 4:38:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 102997

[On eliminating homosexuality from the gene pool]


It would arguably "streamline" the human experience considerably by removing our need to adapt to what is essentially useless behavior in the first place. It would also increase the efficiency with which human beings accomplish certain biological tasks.

At the end of the day, the simple fact of the matter is that homosexuality (note that I did not say homosexual persons) is more or less worthless. It is an anomaly at best, and a distraction at worst.

There is no reason why it should have to exist.

gathomas88, debatepolitics 32 Comments [8/27/2014 4:37:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 102990

Of course all of these theories are based on a refusal to accept that God could find true delight in torturing people. Well, tough. HE DOES. Are we really so arrogant that we think we can define who God must be, or that we can change truths about Him simply because we don’t like them? If our Creator gets high off of torturing His enemies for eternity—which He clearly does—then we need to face this fact square on and ask the Holy Spirit to help us deal with it. We can’t let the fact that we don’t like something stop us from facing reality. GOD defines reality, not us. He clearly likes Hell, and He finds the activities in it so satisfying that He even showcases them to the inhabitants of Heaven. A disturbing idea, yes, and yet what does it teach us about God’s Character? What does it teach us about the purpose of Him bringing us to Heaven? Obviously Heaven is not just about us having fun, but it is about glorifying God and His methods—ALL of His methods. We praise Him for His generosity in giving us eternal blessings that we never did a thing to deserve, and at the same time we soberly observe what happened to those who refused to submit to Jesus.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 47 Comments [8/27/2014 4:30:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 45

Quote# 102989

It’s hard to see Jesus sacrificed on our behalf and not conclude that His Father places a higher value on us than He does His own Son or even Himself. Oh, we’d never say such a thing out loud, but our behavior declares our belief in it nonetheless. The fact that so many Christians struggle over the existence of Hell is evidence of our secret belief that humans rank higher with God than they actually do. Hell is only horrible from a human’s perspective—God is perfectly comfortable with its existence and all that happens in it. We don’t like the idea of Him enjoying Hell because our prides hate the thought that our comfort isn’t His utmost priority. Yet clearly, it is not. God’s own comfort and satisfaction are His top priorities and the fact that He is patient with us for a brief moment on earth must not be misinterpreted as a sign that He is questioning His decision to punish those who rebel against Him. Yes, God wants us to join Him in Heaven, but only on the condition that we submit to His Authority. If we refuse to do so, He is quite happy to hurl us into Hell and He finds torturing us for an eternity far more rewarding than simply uncreating us. This is the same God who describes Himself as love. Yes, He is love, but He is many other things as well. Let’s not promote that one phrase as being a comprehensive description of God’s nature for it is not an accurate description of His core. God’s central motivation in all things is to please Himself. He created us for His own benefit, and everything He does with us and allows us to do has self-serving ends in mind. Even our rebellion serves Him in the end, for He is quite clear in Scripture that it glorifies Him in the eyes of others when He doles out just discipline upon those who defy Him. We were created for the purpose of glorifying God and He gives us two options in how to do that. We can either honor Him with our obedience or we can rebel against Him and set the stage for Him to avenge Himself at our expense. In the end, God’s standards are never compromised nor is He ever left feeling cheated by the final outcome with any one of us. Should we choose to clash our wills against His, we will suffer intensely but He will end up quite content with our receiving just punishment in Hell.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 18 Comments [8/27/2014 4:29:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 102987

God is the most selfish Being there is—He wants everything we do to revolve around Him. This is why He tells us to love Him with all of our heart, soul, mind and strength. In other words, God commands us to be obsessed with Him. Why? Because He loves Himself more than anyone else, and He wants us to do likewise. This can all sound quite negative when we think about it through the grid of carnal pride, but in reality, what God demands from us is what will end up bringing us the greatest joy. Our selfish God designed us to thrive when we revolve our lives around Him. The more we think about God, crave Him, pursue Him, and worship Him, the more satisfied our souls become. We were designed to feel truly complete only when everything we do is about pleasing God. What does this set up tell us about God? Obviously His ego is huge. But in the end, we will find that we want a God who thinks He is magnificent because we were designed by God to love worshiping Him.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 36 Comments [8/27/2014 4:28:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 102986

Whether it’s good, bad, nice or nasty, it was created by God for His own pleasure. Everything God does benefits God in some way. He is a self-serving Being, and He never claims to be otherwise. We’re the ones who invented a God who only thinks of other creatures and pines over humanity with a desperate need to love us. But this egotistical fantasy is hardly grounded in truth. We exist because our existence is doing something positive for God. He has worked things out so that no matter where we end up in eternity—Heaven or Hell—He will be getting some personal benefit out of sustaining our existence. God always gives to get.

Anna Diehl, The Pursuit of God 26 Comments [8/27/2014 4:28:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 102983

Am I the only one who happened to notice that a number of the Russian lady ice skaters, three that I saw, blessed themselves with the sign of the cross as they left the ice after their performance? Those Godless Communists at it again. As our neo-cons love to say Putin is a phony and does not care one wit about Christianity, [but] I have to say those girls looked serious to me! Naturally, no American would attempt such a thing as they would be ridiculed by our press and hounded by interviewers. I will say I can’t remember seeing the sign of the cross made in public outside of a cemetery service. Watch the remainder of the competition to see if it continues. Shocking.

Alex, The Thinking Housewife 30 Comments [8/26/2014 2:55:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 102979

Well. Notwithstanding having plenty of things to say, I haven’t been posting on my blog because it seems pointless. There’s the choir that I can preach to, and then there are the permanent Stockholm Syndrome sufferers who will cling to men’s ideas and the societal structures men have built and call it individuality and “gender identity” and “agency” and anything else they can come up with to obfuscate their various levels of conformity, while asking men for “equality.” If they even admit that men are the problem.

But today, I read something by a young woman who has autism. She can’t read social situations, and men, young and old, have been repeatedly taking advantage of her, everything from creepy staring to rape. I’m feeling like my head is going to explode. “Equality” isn’t going to do a damned thing for her. What shall we do, liberals? More useless askivism? More blogs and websites and wikis about “geek feminism” and “queer feminism” and goddess-knows-what-other sub-feminisms/pseudo-feminisms, onto which men invariably descend with everything from glib dismissal to overt rape threats?

I decided that it’s better to spend my time thinking about what womyn can DO. Frankly, I think it’s about time we moved straight on to violence and destruction. Sudden violence and destruction. I know. It sounds bleak and ugly and dangerous. Well, things are already bleak and ugly and dangerous for womyn. How much worse could it be, really? If you spend enough time thinking about it, enough hours fuming in impotent rage, perhaps you’ll find that risking your life, oh, say, bombing a men’s prison starts to seem worth it, for the future if not for yourself. What else is there? Imagine this: what if nearly every woman on Earth killed a man in his sleep tonight? How nice could tomorrow be? Imagine taking the offensive for once. Playing defense isn’t working. All the damage control in the world doesn’t prevent damage. Personally, I really like taking long walks alone late at night. Ever think about how men destroy even the simplest pleasures in life? Tired of it yet? Tired enough? I am.

I’m not the least bit ashamed to admit that I support male genocide. But I know that any liberals who may be in the audience think that is very mean, and wonder: what about the “good men”? All seven of them, three of whom just haven’t been caught killing or abusing women or children yet. The answer is: collateral damage. And men agree with me.

Yes men, who will bomb an entire country to smithereens and murder thousands of non-combatants to smoke out a handful of terrorists, agree that human collateral damage is acceptable for a “good cause.” Men, who will pay other men to risk their lives rooting about in a huge hole in the ground to mine the metal, and dump toxic waste by-products in poor neighborhoods to keep their corporations producing your iCrap, are ok with human collateral damage. Men will risk exposing thousands to radiation and making whole cities uninhabitable for generations so that we can have electricity, even after witnessing the fallout of other nuclear meltdowns. Who cares about dozens of possible cases of leukemia and mutations in the local wildlife? Men think we need lights, dammit. Etc.

Goddess. Mentally ill man just showed up. Enough for now.

H, Lesbian Plus Feminist 53 Comments [8/26/2014 2:52:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 28
Submitted By: GalvatronPrime

Quote# 102978

But one of many problems here is that apart from the Christian worldview you have no basis for believing that anyone has a moral obligation to be honest (or to be anything for that matter). And thus it makes no sense for you to criticize God or anyone else for allegedly failing to be honest. In the Christian worldview, we are morally obligated to obey our Creator. And God is truth and has commanded us to emulate His character - hence we ought to be truthful. In the Christian worldview we can discuss whether God has specified any qualifications or exceptions where it would be morally right to deceive. But such conversations would be meaningless apart from the Christian worldview because morality is meaningless apart from the Christian worldview

Jason Lisle, Jason Lisle's blog 38 Comments [8/26/2014 2:50:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 102966

No one is born gay or bisexual...there is no scientific proof of this. I know that is what the gay community says, but all the research for this has been disproven. In other words you have been lied too. If bisexuals or homosexuals were born this way..why are their ex gays? ex bisexuals?

moonglow, BibleForums Christian Message Board 31 Comments [8/26/2014 2:49:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 15

Quote# 102964

"Homosexual behavior is an abomination to God," he says in the clip. "When God sees it, it causes him to recoil."

He went on to note, "When we think about the actual act of homosexuality, we have exactly the same reaction. Most people think about that, they don't want to think about that, they don't want to visualize it because it is disgusting."

Bryan Fischer, Huffington Post 41 Comments [8/26/2014 2:45:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Doubting Thomas

Quote# 102963

Edward Jenner—a quack doctor— was the father of the filthy practice of vaccination:

Edward Jenner was an S.J. -- a Slick Jesuit -- who taught the medical world how to use the POISONED NEEDLE. He was the first to associate human diseases with that of animals. This idea paved the way for vaccination which is responsible for the deaths of multiplied millions of people around the world. The idea that humans and animals are related and share the same diseases led to the theory of evilution which is responsible for the spiritual death of multiplied millions more.

In the countryside in Gloustershire, England, where Jenner lived, the farmers had a legend or superstition that catching cowpox (a disease of cows which was transferred to the cows' udders by unwashed or bleeding hands) would act like a charm or amulet to make them immune from catching the human disease of smallpox.

Medicine man Jenner took this local legend or old wives' tale and turned it into a scientific FACT. He did this by first getting some scientific credentials (M.D., F.R.S. - Fellow of the Royal Society). Next he wrote a book and on the title page only he used the term VARIOLAE VACCINAE. This means in Medieval Latin: smallpox of the cow. Thus associating a human disease with a disease of the cow. There never was such a disease as smallpox of the cow until "Dr." Jenner invented it for the title of his book.

[...]

Erasmus Darwin (another doctor) was the grandfather of ape-man Charles Darwin. Since Jenner claimed that humans and animals shared the same diseases, the next step was to promulgate the idea that they had a common ancestor.

Darwin was the father of another fable called the theory of evolution. He STOLE it from the Egyptians and never paid a penny in royalty fees. This is what Darwin said about Jenner and his vaccination:

"Dr Erasmus Darwin, the famous author of Zoonomia, wrote to Jenner on the 24th of February, 1802 (a few weeks before this death): "In a little time it may occur that the christening and vaccination of children may always be performed on the same day." (Jenner and Vaccination, Dr. Creighton, p. 188). (Editor's note: christening means sprinkling babies with water to make them Christians).

Both christening and vaccination are inventions of that old Serpent the devil!!

Nobody except old Beelzebub himself has sent more souls to hell than this ape-man. His grandfather and Jenner laid the foundation of the MAD idea of turning the FABLE of evilution into a scientific FACT.

Niall Kilkenny, Reformation 28 Comments [8/26/2014 2:44:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 28
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 102961

Notice that the eyelids (including eyes) are one of a temptress's greatest weapon. Although seemingly innocent enough, the way that a woman looks at a man says it all. The same holds true for a man. A lustful gaze with wandering eyes that undress women, can permanently ruin a friendship, lead to adultery or much contempt and shame. Indeed, Marilyn Monroe led millions of sinful men to their spiritual death and doom. She has been the ruin of many, and her house is the way to Hell. Joe DiMaggio had every right to be angry and upset over his wife casting her pearl before the swine (or perhaps she was the swine). Satanism is synonymous with violence, torture, sexual immorality, cruelty, mass-killings, nudity and death. America is truly a 100% satanic nation!!!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 37 Comments [8/26/2014 2:43:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 14

Quote# 102959

They're trying to twist the facts, using suicide caused by bullying as a sinful attempt to legitimize homosexuality. It's two entirely separate matters. Bullying is wrong, period. Christian kids get bullied all the time, but you don't hear any sympathy from anyone for them. Such alleged suicides like Jamey's lead me to wonder if this stuff is staged, because the gay community uses EXTREMES to justify the norm, that is, thy want to use jamey's alleged suicide to pass anyi-hate sppech and bullyying laws. it's always the same garbage with society... pass more laws, more laws, and more laws, until we're surviving in a Police State where noone can even open their mouth anymore. We're killing ourselves as a society, Now Homeland Secuirty is puting monitor thy neigubor typem propaganda on the sides of coffee cvups. no joke!

Jamey was infatuated with Lady gag's open support for homosexuals. Lady Gaga blasphemes Jesus Christ!!!

I know all about harassment and bullying. I've said this to mention reports in the mainstream newsmedia about homosexuals committing suicide because of bullying, especially teens.

As a born-again Christian, I know what it feels like to be bullied. Boy do I know what it's like! I've been bullied my entire life for being a zealous Christian. I've been called “baby Jesus,” a “Bible-thumper,” and a lot of horrible other things in the workplace. I learned eventually to laugh at my self, so I wouldn't get upset. Someone would yell, “Hey As*hole,” and I'd yell back, “Yeah, who called me?” I was a tender-hearted man working with some cold-hearted people, and the two don't mix. It wasn't easy.

I've worked at various jobs throughout my work career. I worked in a truck shop for a few as a mechanic. A man came up to me one day at work and asked, “Why do you carry a Bible into work each day? It bothers me.” I replied, “Why do you have Playboy magazines in your toolbox?” It kindly told him, “It's where your heart's at.” He despised me, as did others. Another man threw a 3 lb. hammer at me and missed. I opened my locker and found a 3-page dropdown centerfold of a naked woman. They put whiskey on my toolbox, cigar butts, grease, and garbage. I found a capacitor on my toolbox one day and went to pick it up. I jumped a foot in the air when it discharged as I touched it. One man, Bob, spit on me. Another guy grabbed me by the throat and held me up against a truck. They cursed me on a daily basis.

One man threw my radio on the floor and broke it because he didn't like my Christian music (but he played ACDC, Van Halen and the Devil's music on his radio). I complained to my boss and he said, “If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.” I had a family and needed my job. I was young in my early 20's and didn't know how to deal with all that harassment, so I endured and clung to my Bible. I put Scriptures on my toolbox. I prayed continually. God saw me through!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 40 Comments [8/26/2014 2:42:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 102957

In his famous movies “To Wong Foo: Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar,” “The Birdcage” and “Mrs. Doubtfire,” Robin Williams promoted cross-dressing, drag queens and fags. Our Lord Jesus Christ said in Deuteronomy 22:5: “The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.”
On stage, TV and screen he was a fierce advocate for fags. Robin Williams said of these rolls: "If I can use my celebrity status to draw people into a movie theater to see me perform as an admirable gay man and thereby make them a little more positive about gay people, why wouldn't I do it?"
Our Lord Jesus Christ said: “But the men of Sodom were wicked and sinners before the LORD exceedingly.” Genesis 13:13. Teach that or go home. Or rather, teach that or go to hell.

And as if to punctuate his reprobate condition, late on August 10, 2014, or early August 11, 2014, Robin Williams killed himself. He was found hanged by his own hand. Who does that? Well the Bible gives two notable examples: King Saul and Judas Iscariot. Read those accounts and you will find a very similar experience in those men’s lives that Robin Williams’ family describes in his life, especially their cowardly end. Robin Williams spent his life’s resources, time and ability and money promoting filth and sin and he was damn proud of it. “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?” [Mark 8:36] Our Lord Lord Jesus Christ is true and faithful. While alive in his ministry on the earth, to warn his friends, Our Lord told about a very similar man like Robin Williams: Go with me to Luke Chapter 12. “And he spake a parable unto them, saying, The ground of a certain rich man brought forth plentifully: And he thought within himself, saying, What shall I do, because I have no room where to bestow my fruits? And he said, This will I do: I will pull down my barns, and build greater; and there will I bestow all my fruits and my goods. And I will say to my soul, Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years; take thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry. But God said unto him, Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee: then whose shall those things be, which thou hast provided? So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God.” [Luke 12:16-21]

Friends, Robin Williams hated your souls. Westboro Baptist Church loves your souls. We preach to the living not the dead. Repent or Perish.

Westboro Baptist Church, Westboro Baptist Church blog 36 Comments [8/26/2014 2:40:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 102948

Widespread prevalence of sexual bonds between males (I insist not homosexuality) has been proved beyond doubt amongst wild animals.

Now, the ball is in the court of self-defined heterosexuals. It is their moral duty to prove that heterosexuality indeed does exist in nature.....when all the evidence emphatically points otherwise.

And if they cannot validate it through nature, then the practise of 'dating' (that is neither found in the nature nor in non-western societies) should be banned. Male-female relationships should be limited only to procreation. Casual male-female relationships or love affairs should be made entirely illegal. And all intrusions in the male-only societies by planting females into them, in order to establish a heterosexual order, should be removed. So that we can live in the way that nature has meant us to.

Buddha1, SciForums.com 30 Comments [8/25/2014 3:31:29 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 102947

In fact sex between the 'same' is the most primitive kind of sex practised by living organisms. That shows well beyond doubt that the basic purpose of sex is not reproduction and the pleasure or bonding part is more essentially ingrained for the same sex. It does seem that after sexual dimorphism occurred, nature chose to ride piggy back upon sex between male and female to achieve procreation. But as can be seen from the wild life, it still did not result in heterosexuality.

There are some examples from higher animals too who don't reproduce sexually, but they still have sex with the same-sex.
SEXUAL NEED FOR THE SAME-SEX IS THE BASIC PURPOSE/ DRIVE OF SEX, EVEN BEFORE REPRODUCTION STARTED HAPPENING SEXUALLY

Buddha1, SciForums.com  20 Comments [8/25/2014 3:31:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 102945

David Horowitz dropped by the American Family Association’s “Today’s Issues” today, where he spoke with AFA head Tim Wildmon about how President Obama refuses to condemn the mass killings of Christians or take military action against ISIS. Of course, Obama has repeatedly condemned the killing of Christians and has ordered 90 airstrikes against ISIS to date. But in Horowitz’s world, Obama is cheering on ISIS because he’s a Muslim who hates America. “Obama is an anti-American radical and I’m actually sure he’s a Muslim, he certainly isn’t a Christian,” Horowitz said. “He’s a pretend Christian in the same way he’s a pretend American. It really is disgraceful. He's inviting the terrorists to behead more Americans when he should be attacking them with our military. His whole agenda in office has been to defeat America, he lost the war in Iraq deliberately, he created a vacuum which ISIS has filled.” “Saying he’s the worst president we’ve ever had is not saying enough.”

Horowitz also said that Obama is letting immigrants illegally cross the border in order to kill Americans through anthrax and beheadings. “When he was re-elected, the first thought that came into my mind is, a lot of people are going to be dead because of this election, and how right I was,” he said, warning that the president “destroyed our borders” in order to let “our enemies” enter the U.S. “They’re going to come across our border with their dirty bombs and their anthrax and whatever else, you know, their swords to behead us….The ones who are going to do the killing are coming across our open border and this president is not defending us.”

David Horowitz & Tim Wildmon, Right Wing Watch 24 Comments [8/25/2014 3:28:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Giveitaday

Quote# 102942

I remember when Mother Theresa died, who is infamous in the Catholic religion. They quoted her during the last years of her life saying that she had never felt the presence of God in her life. Of course she didn't, she was a Christ-rejecter. She fully rejected the Commandments of God so that she could keep her own traditions (Mark 7:9). Mark 7:7, “Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.” Mother Theresa didn't have the Holy Spirit of God. She tried to worship God with idolatrous statues, manmade traditions and worship of the Pope; but those are all finely paved roads to Hell fire and damnation!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 36 Comments [8/25/2014 3:26:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 102940

Indeed to most normal men, 14 year old young women are attractive. If you’re implying that any man who perceives (most) such 14 year old young women as attractive is a ‘paedophile’, all you are doing is pushing the agenda of man-hating, sexually jealous, feminist hags

It was only relatively recently, even in our (now highly feminist dominated) society that 14 year olds were LEGALLY married with their own children and such legal marriages were not considered immoral, perverted or indeed as anything related to paedophilia at the time.
Feminists and their bitter, jealousy founded ideologies changed everything related to sex and marriage into the ‘taboo’ that most of our sex-obsessed society believes it is today.

Alan Vaughn, Emma the Emo's Emo Musings 53 Comments [8/25/2014 3:24:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 22

Quote# 102939

Much has been made over the question of whether eating meat is moral. The question generated so much debate because so many of the participants in the debate were atheists without any clear moral code. Lacking this, the only moral compass they possess is that of the society they are born in or that of their upbringing. In such a case the question of whether or not we are justified in inflicting pain on animals for our benefit comes down to nothing more than personal opinion and people will often defend irrational personal opinions vigorously.

If we contrast this with the unchanging truth of The Bible then our problems are resolved. Nowhere in the Bible is eating meat condemned. Furthermore the Old Testament tells us which animals we can eat. The New Testament expanded the potential smorgasbord. Given that the bible (and therefore God) has no objection to our eating meat there is obviously no moral objection on principal.

I see that the issue of "whence morality" was raised in the debate, but that nobody wanted to talk about it.

What about animal suffering?

The Old Testament specifies that animals be bled to death. Although authorities differ on the issue, it seems likely to me that the experience is unpleasant for the animal. Consequently there is no obvious reason for us to care about animal suffering.

Tolerance, RationalWiki 28 Comments [8/25/2014 3:24:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 102937

The Christians are by far the most superior humans on Earth, based on character, second only to the Buddhists monks. Christians, I have seen, radiate love. Hindus are cautious and defensive. Muslims create a shield of non- approachability. Buddhists are present, aware, ever encompassing. Jews have a red light flashing above their heads.

Abhie, Godlike Productions 34 Comments [8/25/2014 3:17:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
1 2 3 4 5 10 11 | top