1 2 3 4 5 9 | bottom
Quote# 101722

GOD DOESN’T HATE HOMOSEXUALS — HE HATES SIN
No one is going to hell because they are homosexual. But some will go to hell for practicing homosexuality. Note the difference in language and meaning. In fact, it is biologically evident that no one is born a homosexual any more than one is born a rapist, murderer, alcholic or child abuser.

There is a difference between being and acting, just as there is a difference between biology and psychology. Today’s pro-homosexual movement wants to pretend that there is a genetic cause for homosexual behavior and equate it to inherent skin color or other ridiculous claims, but they have no evidence of such a biological claim. As much as they would prefer to have an excuse for their sin of desire, they are stuck without one.

If one believes God should ignore the sin of homosexuality, should God also ignore the sins of murder and rape, thievery and adultery? After all, what’s the difference? Was Jeffrey Dahmer sinning when he sexually molested then killed seventeen young men before cannibalizing them? Maybe he was just born with cannibal tendencies? Don’t be ridiculous! One may as well pretend that God loves sin.

Atheism Fails, Facebook 47 Comments [6/25/2014 3:29:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: What?

Quote# 101720

If Christians want to lower the divorce rate in their churches, it would be as simple as kicking out those who frivolously divorce, and treating divorcées as adulteresses. As it is today, abandoned husbands are usually the ones left in the ditch by churches, so this would be a major change. But if churches want to stay true to Christianity, they would do well to recognize that from the beginning, Christian women were not allowed to sue for divorce. There is no precedent in ancient Hebrew, Greek or Roman law for women to divorce their husbands. This is why the Christian church is so ill-prepared to deal with the revolutionary idea of granting women the right to divorce. Even today, Orthodox Jews do not allow it, nor do Muslims (civil law differs, but here we are speaking of ecclesiastic law). Rabbinic and Sharia courts may order men to divorce their wives, but women cannot legally divorce without their husband’s consent.

Women were first granted the right to divorce in revolutionary France, in 1792. This was rescinded shortly thereafter, in 1804, and French women had to wait another 80 years before regaining the right to kick their husbands to the curb. The revolutionary edict was a first in civilized society (if you could apply that moniker to revolutionary France), to be followed some decades later by Great Britain with the Matrimonial Causes Act 1857. Naturally, some fifteen years later mother custody became the norm in the UK.

The transfer of marriage from ecclesiastic to civil law has continued apace since “reforms” of the 19th century, with devastating consequences for traditional marriage. However, this doesn’t mean that churches have to follow civil law — at least not in the United States (not yet, anyway). To this day, rabbinic courts have authority over Orthodox Jewish marriages, including in some civil matters. Given that it contradicts core Christian doctrine, I’m not sure this would be appropriate for Christian churches, but it probably isn’t necessary in any event.

The point is that granting women the right to initiate divorce goes entirely against Christianity, as well as all other major religions. According to the Christian faith, a woman who leaves her husband is an adulteress — even if he consents. So why is it that divorced women are so quickly forgiven and fostered by “Christian” churches? I’m fairly certain that it’s about the money they bring to the table (divorced men are often impoverished), but if Christians looked deep within themselves they’d have to admit that there’s nothing Christian about such an arrangement.

W. F. Price, The Spearhead 38 Comments [6/25/2014 3:28:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 26

Quote# 101719

I heard someone say something interesting.... A pastor was talking about what the world will be like when Christ comes for the church. He preached on Sodom and said that it was going to be a long time before our society got that bad... Then a thought came to me the other day as I heard in Canada they ruled that churches are being FORCED to marry gays. My memory went back to what the pastor said. The hype going on with homosexuality may not be to the point of raping strangers... BUT the liberals have been shoving TOLERANCE down our throats and trying to make us say their lifestyle is okay. I don't think it will be long before our churches will be given that ultimatum. Marry all people or suffer consequences. To me... I thought it seemed the same degree of severity as Sodom. It may not be the same thing... but the men of Sodom were described as crazed men.

ksnyder, Rapture Ready 41 Comments [6/25/2014 3:28:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: documentingtehcrazy

Quote# 101717

20 Basic Truths You Can't Talk about in America Anymore


1) People who want to change sexes should be treated by a psychologist, not deformed through surgery, given hormone treatments, and falsely told that they can change sexes.


2) Most people who remain poor over the long haul in America stay that way because of their own poor life choices.
3) Most black Americans are good and decent people, but percentage wise there are more black Americans in jail because percentage wise, black Americans commit a lot more crimes than white Americans.
4) As often as not in America, the people claiming to be “victims” are the real bullies and they don’t deserve anyone’s sympathy.
5) The reason most politicians in D.C. are shameless liars with no character is because most Americans will knowingly choose a shameless liar with no character who says what they want to hear over an honest man with morals who tells them the hard truths they’d rather ignore.


6) Illegal aliens are foreigners who knowingly broke the law to come here and Americans owe them even less than we owe other foreigners living in China, Sweden, or El Salvador because at least those people didn’t break our laws.
7) Life begins at conception and having an abortion is no morally different than strangling your baby in the crib.
8) Most liberals aren’t patriotic and they don’t love their country.
9) Our soldiers should make every effort to avoid civilian casualties, but when it comes right down to it, the life of an American soldier should be treated as more important than the life of a foreign civilian.

10) We’d be better off as a society if the people who are ignorant, ill informed, or who really don’t care one way or another, didn’t vote.
11) The only practical way to make peace between the Israelis and Palestinians is for the Israelis to transfer the Palestinians and take their land.
12) This is a Christian nation that has been successful because it adopted Christian principles and the more we move away from that, the worse off we will be as a nation.
13) Men are just generally better at some things than women, just as women are just generally better at some things than men are.
14) “Racism” used to be a big deal in America, but these days the people who cry racism are usually phonies trying to gain a political advantage or deflect from ethical shortcomings or poor performance.
15) Long term, the only way our country can pay its bills is by asking everyone who’s not dirt poor to pay as much in taxes to the government as they’re given in services if they want to continue to receive those services.
16) Nine times out of ten, a mother and father will do a considerably better job of raising a child than a single mother, a single father, two gay parents or their grandparents.
17) The Boy Scouts could never survive gay scoutmasters because no parents with a brain in their head are sending their male, teenage boy out in the woods alone with a gay man who may very well be attracted to him, just as the parents of Girl Scouts wouldn’t want to send their teenage daughter out alone in the woods with a straight adult who might secretly be savoring the opportunity to have her alone.


18) People who are homeless over the long term are overwhelmingly mentally ill or have substance abuse problems and the only thing we can really do to help them is round them up, put them into halfway houses and force them to get treatment in spite of themselves.
19) If you have good character, you should feel ashamed of taking food stamps, taking welfare, or being on a school lunch program.
20) We would be much better off as a nation if most of the immigrants to this country were well educated people from nations in Europe that shared our Western values as opposed to our current policy which brings in mostly less educated people from Third World nations.



John Hawkins, Right Wing News 65 Comments [6/25/2014 3:27:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 29
Submitted By: PhillipaFry

Quote# 101715

How to stop Islam?

Well.... ridicule is very powerful.
I'm sure that now that the film "The Innocence of Muslims" has come along, we will see the floodgates opened and there will be cartoon after cartoon, movie after movie about dirty old Mo and his hangers-on.

Ridicule, ridicule, ridicule and ridicule again.

Ridicule the stupid cult and its pathetic leader with his made-up "god" allah.
Drown the Muslims in ridicule, scorn, derision and contempt. They deserve no better.

After a few years of that, a certain portion of Muslims will decide to become terrorists (and will try to take a few of us with them). But a large number will also leave Islam.

Even in the midst of all their stupidity, Muslims are still human (more or less).
Imagine - your "team" has become the laughing-stock of the world.
Why would you want to stay with it? Why would anyone want to join it?

Being tagged a "loser" can be very, very powerful.
The power of ridicule, scorn and derision should not be underestimated.

At the same time as the ridicule comes the standing-firm by us (and those like us).

The violence and mayhem that Islam causes has made me massively more hard-line when it comes to Islam. I am now not only not afraid of Muslims - I actively despise them. When I see one in the street, I sneer, scowl and "look daggers" at them, whether it be a man, woman or child.

One thing about my country (which I will not mention) - it may be small, but it is very rugged and very easily defended..

enceladus, Faith Freedom International 41 Comments [6/25/2014 3:23:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Captain Lhurgoyf

Quote# 101714

“Ray, may I ask a serious question. I'm an atheist who believes whole-heartedly that evolution is occurring all around us... But, is it possible that creationism lead to evolution-ism?” Matt Miller

Jesus said, "In the beginning God made them male and female." God made man in His image (as a moral creation) as male and female, reproducing after their own kind. These two things are observable and testable.

However, evolution believes that male and female in 1.4 different kinds of animals, birds, fish and insects just happened. It was unplanned, a coincidence, an accident, or just fate. That belief is intellectual suicide. BTW. Adaptation (not Darwinian evolution) is occurring all the time. See www.evolutionVsGod.com for details of the confusion of most believers in evolution.

Ray Comfort, Ray Comfort's Blog 29 Comments [6/25/2014 3:23:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 101711

I don't agree with apes having the same rights as humans. Does that make me apephobic?

Just because a person disagrees with something doesn't automatically mean they fear/hate it.

A lot of people use the therm "-phobe" incorrectly (specifically homophobe).

-phobe:

denoting a person having a fear or dislike of what is specified

Homophobe:
a person who hates or fears homosexual people

We do not hate/fear homosexuals. Before you spout out some accusation, learn the definition.

And while we're at it:

big·ot
: a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc.

When we dislike someones sexuality (not the person itself) it's not unfairly. We have plenty of valid reasons.

danielbauwens, deviantArt 33 Comments [6/25/2014 3:01:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 101707

35 (+1) Steps to Be a Woman of Character

1) Do the house work (all of it) unless your husband says otherwise.

2) Find mature Christian women whom are submitted to their husbands for ‘emotional’ support. Men are not women, so don’t expect them to relate to you as women.

3) Question cultural products produced by women. Are these women promoting misandry or other destructive ideas? Read your Bible and seek wise council if unsure.

4) Realize that you are not the center of the universe and a man will need time to himself. Don’t interrupt, don’t start trouble and don’t nag.

5) Realize that you, as a woman, are not the authority on what is sexist and what is not. Read your Bible.

6) Realize that sexism, as it is understood in the mainstream of society today, is not necessarily a bad thing. If a man tells you something is sexist, see if the Bible agrees with him. If a woman tells you something is sexist, see if the Bible agrees with her.

7) Don’t have sex until you are married. If you already have, then STOP. A woman of character does not fornicate. There is no need to have clear unambiguous communication regarding sexual relationships if you are not a whore.

8) Contraception? Consider the aspirin method. See number 7.

9) The HPV vaccine should have no place in biblical patriarchy for a woman of character. See number 7.

10) Have nothing to do with progressive name politics. If you don’t want your husband’s name, then don’t get married.

11) Don’t have children until you are married. When you do have children, expect to live the traditional role of wife and mother unless your husband says otherwise. You should behave like a Titus Ch 2, Prov 31 type of woman.

12) Pay attention to and gently encourage women to engage in traditional roles at family functions and at church. This especially should be done in the presence of feminists and churchian egalitarians. As a classy, feminine, attractive woman who believes the Bible, you should stand against role reversals whenever possible.

13) Be mindful of your inclination to usurp power within intimate/domestic relationships, especially with men…whether a husband, suitor, or family members.

14) Make sure honesty and respect guide your sexual relationship with your husband. Review number 7. Forget about “romance” as represented in modern society. It promises what cannot be delivered. Read your Bible.

15) Don’t be an online bystander in the face of misandry. You may have sons one day. Also, review numbers 5 and 6.

16) Be responsible with money. You don’t need 100 pairs of shoes or credit card debt, and any husband, future or current, does not need the added burden these would create.

17) Exercise and eat right. Do you find overweight and out of shape men attractive?

18) Don’t speak ill of men. Do not slander or gossip.

19) Do not pay attention to or believe what the “sex of experts” and “key figures” in the media say about anything. They are blind fools leading other blind fools. See number 7 and read your Bible.

20) Ensure that your role models are (or were if deceased) God fearing women who submitted themselves to their husbands.

21) Praise the virtues of your husband, father, and / or brother(s) to others (especially to other women).

22) Demonstrate integrity with your female friends. (i.e., Don’t be a “ho.”). Also, don’t have “HOs” for friends. Don’t have friends that try to turn you against your husband or your father. Don’t have friends that talk bad about the men in their lives.

23) Don’t treat your husband or any other male family members disrespectfully. See number 4.

24)Know that acknowledging your own selfish opinions and stereotypes is not enough. Do something about them.

25) Do not have male “friends” or “beta orbiters”. Realize that the men you know are family, brothers in Christ, or acquaintances.

26) Submit to your father and, if married, your husband. Ask them for guidance and council. Also, find mature Christian women who take the whole council of God and have submitted themselves to their own husbands to teach you.

27) When courting, be responsible for events and special dates associated with your side of the family. When married, be responsible for all of it unless you husband says otherwise.

28) Men’s appearances should not be your concern unless they are suitors you are considering for marriage. Even then you should not nag them about it. See number 4.

29) Do not expect male family members or acquaintances to be at your beckon call. Be it to walk you home alone at night, or to a public space where you are likely to feel unsafe, or any other endeavor of your making. You can ask, but do not expect such treatment. Men are not beasts of burden that exist to serve you.

30) Inject wifely submission and biblical Patriarchy into your daily conversations with other women (especially with feminists and egalitarians) as often as possible.

31) Do not consume drugs or excessively drink alcohol. A woman of character is not a druggy or a drunk.

32) Be aware of the resources you consume, and don’t use more than is necessary. Someone is paying for it, and you can bet your bottom dollar it most likely is a man.

33) Don’t spread feminist none sense such as “income inequality” and “a woman can do anything a man can do”. Pretty much anything you hear a feminist claim as a fact will instead be a long refuted talking point.

34) Understand that your femaleness has an unearned privilege attached to it that you have to actively work to cede, and that being male comes with an unearned disadvantage that men have always had to bear.

35) Expose feminism for what it really is, rebellion against God and His creation and misandry in disguise

JDG, Dalrock 68 Comments [6/24/2014 3:22:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 62

Quote# 101705

Is Militient Atheism on the rise?
I mean nowadays it's cool to be an Atheist and uncool to be a Christian. Dawkins, Hitchens, and Harris encourage their followers to discriminate against anyone who isn't an Atheist. I did some research and it turns out that Christians are often harassed by Atheists in public schools(yet another reason to homeschool your Christian kid). I did some research and I found out they even have a method of Atheist indoctrination called the "convert or die" method. Basically Atheist kids(who are sometimes encouraged by Atheist teachers) bully a Christian kid until he/she converts to Atheism, drops out of school, or kills his or herself. Yet this goes unnoticed by the liberal media because they ignore you unless you're a Muslim.
Is it possible that in the future Atheists can kill Christians and get away with it? After all now it's illegal for a Christians to express their religious beliefs,but it's okay for Atheists to express their religious beliefs? They're totally biased against Christians! I bet that in the future. It will be okay for Atheists to murder Christians, burn churches (Atheists are more likely to commit church burnings than regular people), vandalize Christian homes, destroy capitalism, and force everyone to become an Atheist!
Is there any proper way to defend myself against militient Atheists? How do I protect myself and my home? Should I get a burglur alarm or something?

Kaykay, Yahoo! Answers 48 Comments [6/24/2014 3:20:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Juicifur

Quote# 101703

"Underneath it all, authentic ‘born-anew’ Christians do not have a maliciously-disobedient mindset to dress immodestly (especially during warm days) to thoughtlessly and selfishly cause hapless male victims to stumble into non-solicited premature erotic awakening and resultant deviancies outside of marriage. For a bonafide Christian, he (or she) wants to do things God’s way … it’s ‘no water off their back’ to so comply.”
Men are victims of women dressing immodestly. There is no less harsh way to say how I feel about this: FUCK YOU.

Vulconus Erratacanus, STFU Believers 39 Comments [6/24/2014 3:20:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: PhillipaFry

Quote# 101702

The extremist, carrying an assault rifle, shows the camera the badges on the uniforms of his prisoners. He then grabs them one after the other by the hair and makes them repeat the Isis slogan ‘Baqiya’, which is thought to mean "(Isis) will remain in existence" or "Islamic state will stay".

One of the men, a corporal, appears to be more reluctant than the others to repeat the slogan, and has to be ordered several times to say the word before he obeys.

Off camera, the corporal’s tormentor forces him to lie on the ground and shoots him.

The video then shows the militant gloating over what he has done, and holding the dead man's identity card up to the camera.

He asks a captured soldier sitting beside the dead body: “This dog I killed, where is he from?

Told that the man he killed was a Shia from Sinjar, in northern Iraq, he says: “He is a Shia, praise to Allah, the lord of the universe!

“Praise to Allah, whether he is a believer or not, I killed him. I killed a Shia! I killed a Shia!”


Bold emphasis mine



unnamed ISIS Terrorist , The Independent 36 Comments [6/24/2014 3:18:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 23
Submitted By: dharmicdalek

Quote# 101701

Liberals like to portray conservatives as “hateful” when we identify things that are wrong.

The truth is that warning people of danger is a positive and loving thing. It is sad that we live in a world that condemns people for loving others enough to tell them the truth.

With so many bad things happening — e.g., Islamist attacks, corrupt politicians and bureaucrats, the crisis on our borders — it is easy to feel overwhelmed, get discouraged and assume that we are powerless to do anything about it.

While none of us are able to stop all the evil in the world, there are areas where we can be effective. Protecting our children is one of these areas.

I recently told the children in my Sunday School class that Satan is often a whisperer. The Devil likes to whisper and plant seeds in our minds that then lead us to do wrong.

If we listen to Satan’s whispers, they get louder and louder and, eventually, something that was known to be wrong gets shouted as a “right.”

One of Satan’s whispers that became a shout is liberals using homosexuality in their wars on religious freedom and children.

Just listen to the words of Chai Feldblum, Obama’s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission appointee, who stated in 2006:

“There can be a conflict between religious liberty and sexual liberty, but in almost all cases, the sexual liberty should win, because that’s the only way that the dignity of gay people can be affirmed in any realistic manner.”

Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender (LGBT) activists have bought politicians, the media and academia.

They shout down objective morality and now regularly use the force of government (and our tax dollars) to “normalize” deviant and destructive behavior and “punish” any who stand in their way.

Whether it is pushing homosexual pornography and transgender bathrooms to kids as young as kindergarten, or trying to drive Christians out of business, the LGBT community grows increasingly aggressive.

The LGBT movement has followed its plan to demonize traditional morality as documented in Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen’s 1987 article, “The Overhauling of Straight America” (“The Most Influential Essay You’ve Never Heard Of” at www.canonandculture.com).

Children are especially at risk from the LGBT attacks, as they want to be loved by their friends and others.

When all they hear and see on TV or at school is that homosexuality is a lifestyle choice that must be accepted and idolized, many feel pressured to either fall into the destructive lifestyle themselves or support this damaging choice in the lives of friends and family.

Many of those who should be standing in defense or our children instead are buying another one of Satan’s whispers that Christians are not allowed to stand up for Bible truths in public.

When liberals say that government should stay out of the personal lives of others, what they really mean is that only liberals should use the power of government to force their personal views on others.

The U.S. Senate even has a pending bill making LGBT a “foreign policy priority,” including a special State Department envoy.

Last week, the homosexual “pride” flag was officially flown with the American flag above the American embassy in Israel.

Politicians from President Barack Obama to local school boards support the attacks of homosexuals and their allies on the sacred institution of marriage and morality.

Outlaw judges are single-handedly overturning laws protecting the sanctity of marriage. So-called clergy write books lying about the Bible’s teachings on homosexuality.

They fail to understand that, like the loving Father He is, God warns us to protect us, not to “take away our fun.”

Connie Highland, Paris Post-Intelligencer 21 Comments [6/24/2014 3:18:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: documentingtehcrazy

Quote# 101699

The Bible doesn't say that an undisciplined child brings shame to the father. No, rather, the Bible says in Proverb 29:15 that a child left undisciplined brings shame upon THE MOTHER! Mothers are supposed to spank and discipline the children.

You've probably heard the old saying, “You just wait until your father gets home.” I'm certainly not against such loyalty to fathers, but it would be better, I think, for the mother to learn to discipline her children when the father is not present. There's a science behind the disciplining of children, which every parent should learn about. There's a proper way to discipline a child. You mama's ought to be taking a switch to the exterior of your bratty child. Did you ever stop to realize that God put that padded area in the back for a reason? God made that padded area in the human posterior for spanking! Spank your child! Again, Dr. Jack Hyles explains in detail the proper way to spank a child in his timeless classic, HOW TO REAR CHILDREN.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 28 Comments [6/24/2014 3:17:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 16

Quote# 101694

Now if there is SEX slavery going on...that is the fault of those who thought that giving out condoms in schools, putting sex in every movie and TV show was a GREAT idea.

HHH cannot blame SEX slavery on Christians or Christianity....Jesus taught us to flee from sexual immorality, so this problem goes to SECULARISTS who thought it was a good idea to take God out of schools and to promote abortion so life has NO value anymore. Secularists also promoted homosexuality, so family life has no value anymore.

Secularist didn't LISTEN to Jesus teachings and so we have all the horrible problems now in regards to sexual immorality.


dlo_3us2001, Realabortiondebate 25 Comments [6/24/2014 3:13:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 18

Quote# 101693

Can we pray the polyamory away? If we sit by and complain or stick our heads in the sand, arguing that Christians should not be discussing these issues, then we’re admitting defeat and displeasing Christ. But if you believe that God can deliver some from the grip of immorality—whether that’s adultery, fornication, masturbation, pornography, homosexuality, polygamy, bestiality, polyamory or some other sexual sin—then drop to your knees and join with me in intercessory prayer. It’s not only about setting the captives free—it’s about protecting the next generation of young minds the media is molding.


Jennifer LeClaire, BarbWire.com 21 Comments [6/24/2014 3:05:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Persephone 66

Quote# 101689

Well, in general, if men begin to see women as their adversaries rather than as their comrades, and a battle ensues, then the men will win hands down. The women will have no chance of succeeding.

The only question of real interest is, therefore, will there be such a battle? And the answer to this is that it is probably already taking place. The Men's Movement is NOT a major power player in this battle, as yet, but it will be.

For the moment, the battle is mostly taking place at the level of the individual (divorce, violence, avoidance of marriage, promiscuity, homosexuality) and it has been going on for some time.

But when enough men begin to realise that many of the world's problems arise because of the dissatisfaction of men, and they consider ways in which this might be best alleviated, the subjugation of women while increasing their number would seem to have a lot going for it - particularly given that most men on the planet would quite readily take to such an idea.

And even those who initially dissented could probably be persuaded to change their minds without too much effort.

Thus, and for example, it would not surprise me at all if men's psychology led them to create circumstances which allowed them to access a veritable harem of women whenever they wished to do so.

After all, the technology (e.g. the internet) will enable their psychology to have a huge impact. Future biological techniques will allow them to create females to specification. And globalisation will ensure that there is no escape and no alternative to a male-dominated landscape.

Indeed, the required male psychology is already in place, the appropriate technology is getting there, globalisation is progressing quickly, and appropriate biological techniques are not that far away.

So what, exactly, is likely to prevent men in the future from, say, breeding women like they breed dogs and cattle?

Nothing, it seems to me.

Supporting feminism will probably turn out to be the biggest mistake that western women have ever made. They have betrayed the very men who sacrificed much of their being and who worked and fought so hard in order to protect and care for them and themselves, and who have managed to provide the west with all the luxuries and benefits to which its peoples have grown so accustomed.

Compared to western men, western women have contributed very little to the stunning progress achieved in their societies and, currently, by supporting feminism they seem to be doing their damnedest to destroy what their men have achieved.

And when enough western men recognise that the current contributions of women, in the main, are more than offset by the problems that they are causing by their selfishness, I cannot foresee any other outcome than the one alluded to above; unless men simply continue to look on unthinkingly, and allow their societies to crumble and decay without any concern even for themselves - which, of course, might happen.

Angry Harry, Angry Harry 47 Comments [6/23/2014 3:29:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 38
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 101687

Republican Maine state Representative Lawrence Lockman is under fire for comments he’s made in the media regarding rape, abortion, and homosexuality.

An investigation by Mike Tipping, an activist with Maine People’s Alliance, found numerous offensive comments made by the Republican in various newspaper interviews.

Perhaps the most inflammatory was a press statement from 1995 in which Lockman says “If a woman has (the right to an abortion), why shouldn’t a man be free to use his superior strength to force himself on a woman? At least the rapist’s pursuit of sexual freedom doesn’t (in most cases) result in anyone’s death.”

That wasn’t all.

According to the report, Lockman once implied that the HIV virus can be spread through mosquitoes and bed sheets. Lockman also asserted that liberals helped exacerbate the AIDS epidemic by assuring “the public that the practice of sodomy is a legitimate alternative lifestyle, rather than a perverted and depraved crime against humanity.”

In a letter to Bangor News, Lockman once wrote “Clearly the practice of sodomy is learned behavior, and those addicted to this form of biologically-insane sex are at high risk for all manner of serious medical problems.”

Lockman also spoke out against HIV infected students attending school, saying “It’s peculiar that the government is telling health care workers that surfaces contaminated with bodily fluids should be thoroughly disinfected, but at the same time they are telling us that toilet seats have some magical property that they are able to resist viruses.”

He also tried to alert people to a “secret gay affirmative action plan,” saying “You can bet the rent money they will demand that employers set up goals and timetables to achieve 10 percent homosexual representation in the workforce and in government contracts.”


Lawrence Lockman, Issue Hawk 26 Comments [6/23/2014 3:09:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 23
Submitted By: Daniel

Quote# 101686

The truth about daycare is that daycare centers are not the "caring, nurturing" environments that they and their defenders claim they are. Daycare centers are liberal slaughterhouses of the mind. And I can prove it.

[...]

The first incident involved a set of toy blocks. I had just finished a day of work and had arrived at the daycare to pick Micah up. Normally, this is obviously something that my wife would have done, but she had an appointment with the pastor of our church. On my way into the daycare center, I paused at the window so I could observe my son at play. The daycare provider had opened up a box of blocks, and Micah [seventypercent's first child] had run quickly over to it and helped himself to a large number of them. The other children followed suit, although they did not get quite so many as Micah did. The children then began to sit on the carpet and play with the blocks.

What happened next chills me to this day.

The daycare provider walked over to Micah, looked disapprovingly at his pile of blocks, and then forcibly took nearly half of them away. She then proceeded to give them to the other children, so that they all had roughly the same amount. I thought to myself: What in the name of Heaven is this woman doing? Micah had all of those extra blocks because he had the ambition and initiative to run over to them and pick them up. The other children had missed the boat by not being observant and quick enough! What are these people teaching children when they step in and redistribute their blocks -- by force -- to "equalize" things?

It occurred to me that this type of toy policy (strong central control with an emphasis on punishing the successful and rewarding the lazy) was no different than the style of economics practiced in the former Soviet Union and Communist China. The most important lesson that children can be taught is that hard work yields rewards and that those who refuse to work will go without. Yet the message that this daycare woman sent was "Lazy children, just sit back and we'll bring your fair share of the blocks to you. Assertive children, shame on you!"

The second incident was the straw that broke the camel's back.

My wife arrived at the daycare center to pick Micah up, and the daycare provider was reading to the children from a book entitled (I swear this is true) Gay And Loving It. As you can probably guess, the book was nothing more than a rambling piece of homosexualist propaganda aimed at children, intended to convince them that the chosen "gay" lifestyle is perfectly normal and acceptable. My wife, as you can probably understand, was outraged. She went out to the car, which we keep well-stocked with Jack Chick tracts, and grabbed an appropriate one. She then brought it into the daycare center and politely asked the provider to read it, in the interest of fairness to both sides.

What was the response? You can probably guess.

She was told that "preaching is not allowed" and that "we cannot teach any single religion as the truth." Sound familiar, friends? Of course it does. This is the exact mantra that is robotically spewed by the teachers' "labor unions" that control government (pagan) schools. At any rate; that was it. My wife and I immediately pulled Micah out of that horrid daycare center, and she turned in her resignation at her place of employment the very next day. Enough was enough, we had decided, and my wife has been an at-home parent and homeschooler ever since.

So let's review the environment of a typical American daycare center:

- Forced redistribution of capital; hatred of success
- Institutionalized atheism
- Embracing of anti-Scriptural perversion
- Brutal censorship

If you can't see what the true agenda of America's daycare industry is, then you are either blind or willfully ignorant. There is much evidence to suggest that organized elements of the Communist party either own or control a large percentage of this country's daycare providers. This is a battle that we can win, but we have to win it now, before things get out of hand. Communists are called "Reds" because they have this little habit of spilling the blood of their own people on the soil via assault rifle. It is a thoroughly despicable and dangerous worldview. If we are not committed to saving our children from Communism, how can we call ourselves parents?

seventypercent, Adequacy 52 Comments [6/23/2014 3:08:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 46
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 101684

I had a thought recently about feminism and how women behave. Women inherently see men as having authority over them. However, this authority is not a societal construct. The balance of leadership and submission is in-built in our natures. If you look at how feminists behave, they act like children rebelling against their parents. This is quite different to how people behave when they feel like they have authority over their own lives. People who have their own sense of authority over their lives do not act this way. Women claim that they are rebelling against the so-called patriarchy, but they are not. They are rebelling against their own submissive nature. Thus, it never ends. They cannot win, because there is no external oppressor. In a way, feminists don't entirely hate men for being men; they hate men for the fact that women are women.

geektragedy, Reddit 24 Comments [6/23/2014 3:08:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Ultimate Paragon

Quote# 101683

Speaking at the 2014 March for Marriage in Washington, D.C., Huckabee said that there was “no basis in the law” that gave a single judge the right to strike down same-sex marriage bans, like Sixth Judicial Circuit Judge Chris Piazza did in Arkansas in 2012.

“Nothing threatens your personal liberty more than the notion that you would bow your knee to the court system apart from the ultimate rule of the Constitution,” he opined. “And all of the branches of government, all of which are not there to tell you what you cannot do, but to guarantee the freedoms that you are always empowered to have.”

“We are under an obligation to obey God and the law, and if necessary, to defy an institution that is out of control,” the former Arkansas governor continued.

To make his point, Huckabee quoted from a letter that Martin Luther King’s Jr. wrote while spending eight days in the Birmingham Jail for fighting to end segregation.

“One may well ask, ‘How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?’” King had written. “The answer is found in the fact that there are two types of laws: there are just laws, and there are unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that ‘An unjust law is no law at all.’”

Huckabee continued reading from King’s letter: “We can never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was “legal” and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was ‘illegal.’ It was ‘illegal’ to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler’s Germany. But I am sure that if I had lived in Germany during that time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers even though it was illegal.”

“I wish I had penned those words,” Huckabee exclaimed. “But they were penned by someone who understood freedom, and understood that there was a time to stand up against law when it has become unjust. Those are the words that were penned in 1954 by Martin Luther King Jr. in his letter from the Birmingham Jail.”

“I wish he were here today to say in the people in the building this one, Mr. Supreme Court justices, Madam Supreme Court justices, your role is only to interpret the law, to make sure that it somehow meshes with the Constitution, not that it messes with the Constitution!” he shouted.

Mike Huckabee, Raw Story 38 Comments [6/23/2014 3:07:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Kevin Klawitter

Quote# 101682

Here's how evowackos "debate".

• They use "science", "scientist" and/or "scientific" ar least five times in every grammatically incompetent sentence;
• They claim to be scientists/professors of science in prestigious institutions such as MIT, but their abysmal ignorance of science exposes them as teen trolls within a few posts;
• They are without exception pompous, arrogant, ignorant, contentious, insulting, brazen, shameless, and clueless;
• They are with few exceptions the first in an ev thread to raise the issue of faith and religion;
• They attack my Christianity and the Bible even though I have NEVER cited either in my incisive demolitions of their junk science;
• They accuse creationinists/ID advocates of being religious, but they worship Darwin and cite/quote TalkOrigins as their godless bible;
• They utterly refuse to address any scientifically sound rebuttal of their mythology;
• They universally insist that natural selection renders math and probabilities irrelevant and makes the impossible inevitable;
• They invariably cite consensus as their proof of evolutionism;
• They load their Plan-9-level bullshit with subjunctive-mode words/phrases such as "might have", "may have", "could have", "it is assumed", "it is thought", "it is supposed", "let us imagine", etcetera, and they have the balls to call that science;
• And on and on and on ad nauseam.

It would be refreshing to encounter one of the zit-popping little snot-eaters who actually attempted to debate rather than reciting their tedious mantras that we've all heard/read at least a hundred times.

DoctorDoom, Where Liberty Dwells 35 Comments [6/23/2014 3:06:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 18

Quote# 101680

Had you ever wonder why you would find (fossilized) eggs at all - after all wouldn't they have had millions of years to hatch while they were being fossillised?


TasManOfGod, christianfourms.com 39 Comments [6/23/2014 3:04:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 29

Quote# 101678

4 billion years? How does one even contemplate the enormity of that kind of made up on the fly assertion let alone come close to proving it? I don't think the people who say this shit even appreciate the nearly infinite(might as well be) amount of time 4 billion years actually is. Might as well say any number at that point, 444 gosh-zillion. If this is the kind of total made up shit scientists throw around they might as well be children babbling funny sayings to Allen Fundt. Everyone bags on YECers and then doesn't equally laugh at the OECers or whatever they wanna be called or even just 'scientists' who stick a swollen thumb up their ass and sniff it to determine the flavor of the month.

I'd prefer it if they had just an ounce of humility and said a real long time. As it is they come across as having the common sense of a common idiot but it works because peer pressure is 4 billion years old.

Wyatt Junker, Where Liberty Dwells 52 Comments [6/22/2014 3:59:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 41
Submitted By: David

Quote# 101676

Is there an atheist who is not a rabid, kneejerk liberal?

Atheists exist for one reason only: to "prove" that God does not exist and thereby provide themselves with an illusion that they won't be in the court of the Righteous Judge.

I used to be one of them, ergo I speak with authority when I say that atheists are the most ignorant, intolerant, virulent, corrosive, bigoted, hateful assholes on the planet. They are monomaniacally obsessed with erasing every trace of God from public life and with ridiculing or censoring the speech of believers. My files are replete with examples of sociopathic atheists going to lunatic lengths to suppress religious faith.

The idiots think they have an escape clause. Sorry, fools (Psalm 14:1), but it doesn't work that way.

DoctorDoom, Where Liberty Dwells 56 Comments [6/22/2014 3:59:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 34
Submitted By: David

Quote# 101675

There was nothing wrong with any iteration of the Catholic Inquisition. The Inquisition served to purge the world of the Godless and Demonic; it is something that should be considered today, along with Crusades.

Castaigne, Where Liberty Dwells 43 Comments [6/22/2014 3:58:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 35
Submitted By: David
1 2 3 4 5 9 | top