Quote# 101728

On his radio program today, Bryan Fischer called on anti-gay activists to "reclaim the word discrimination" because discrimination against gays, he repeatedly asserted, is a good thing.

"Discrimination, when it comes to sexual behavior," Fischer proclaimed," is not bad, it is good, and it is necessary. The alternative is utter social chaos. So [it's] time, ladies and gentlemen, to reclaim the discrimination word when it comes to sexual matters. It's not bad; it's good. It's a virtue and it's necessary"

Bryan Fischer, Right Wing Watch 26 Comments [6/27/2014 3:14:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 101741

Atheism is the religion. Science is the sacred Golden Calf. The Atheists are essentially like the Borg and want to assimilate all into the anxiety disorder whose primary manifestation is what they know as "being logical". Logic is the antithesis of experience. The truth and reality of God is something that can only be experienced.

A-Theist SWIM, Yahoo Answers 38 Comments [6/26/2014 5:04:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 28
Submitted By: ThatGuy

Quote# 101739

In response to “I’m not a vegetarian hater; I just hate bogus arguments” Chimpanzees do NOT hunt down and consume other small animals, besides bugs like ants and fleas. While yes, humans were never meant to be strictly vegan, they were certainly not meant to eat pigs, or cows. Why do you think we cook and spice our meat? We cook our meet to avoid meat-borne diseases that carnivores and some omnivores are naturally resistant to, and so that we can actually chew and digest it. We spice and flavor our food so that the taste appeals to us. Also we don’t “salivate at the thought of grass and control our “instinctive” urge to eat every bush and plant they pass when walking down the street” because those aren’t plants that humans would consume naturally in the wild, but I would have to control the “urge” to eat a mango, for instance. And animals in the wild aren’t obese because they have a reason to get up and work out, while most humans don’t. Wild animals also don’t have the abundance of food that we do. In fact the reason we love sugars so much is that they are good and essential for us in the right amount, but scarce in the wild, so we have an instinct to eat them when available. the same goes for fats and oils found in potato chips. Humans are omnivores, but only to the point of our ability to eat certain bugs and worms, which is by standard, gross, and not something I, or anyone else considered “normal” would ever do unless forced.

Pro-Vegan, PeTA 51 Comments [6/26/2014 5:02:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 101738

When you see dead animals on the side of the road, are you tempted to stop and snack on them? Does the sight of a dead bird make you salivate? Do you daydream about killing cows with your bare hands and eating them raw? If you answered “no” to these questions, congratulations—like it or not, you’re an herbivore.

According to biologists and anthropologists who study our anatomy and our evolutionary history, humans are herbivores who are not well suited to eating meat. Humans lack both the physical characteristics of carnivores and the instinct that drives them to kill animals and devour their raw carcasses.

PeTA, PeTA 60 Comments [6/26/2014 5:02:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 28

Quote# 101737

Some people have an imaginary friend who tells them that there’s no God.

Ray Comfort, Facebook 42 Comments [6/26/2014 5:01:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 28
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 101735

Rupret Wily: What is absurd about Atheism?

Ray Comfort: Rupret Wily. A genuine atheist believes that nothing created (made) everything. It is intellectual suicide.

Ray Comfort, Facebook 32 Comments [6/26/2014 5:01:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 15
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 101734

Those who lose the fear of God either fall into the absurdity of atheism or the complacency of idolatry.

Ray Comfort, Facebook 26 Comments [6/26/2014 5:00:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: Chris

Quote# 101730

Feminism, distilled: "I'm ugly, I can't get laid with a normal man, ergo male desire is rape culture." Also see: Sour grapes. @Jezebel

heartiste, Twitter 26 Comments [6/26/2014 4:58:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 101729

Anti-discrimination statutes trade one kind of discrimination (against sexual deviancy) for another (against Christianity).

Bryan Fischer, Twitter 17 Comments [6/26/2014 4:57:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 16
Submitted By: Ibuki Mioda

Quote# 101727

(Commenting on Loren Morris, who had sex with a young boy fifty times starting when she was sixteen years old and he was eight.)

a) don’t believe it, looks fake
b) if it did happen, that young man was raping her

case closed

sexselector, sexselector 49 Comments [6/26/2014 3:36:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 35

Quote# 101726

if a woman does a “sex crime”, it doesn’t have that word.
"rape" is taken. it is done by a penis. come up with your own word for other stuff.

sexselector, sexselector 24 Comments [6/26/2014 3:35:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 101725

When i was at school we were taught Darwin's Theory of Evolution as a FACT.
(also we were taught creationism - so we had both sides). Now Darwin is being ousted for Sudden Change Theory, now being taught as a FACT. Creationism, or Divinely Guided evolution, is ousted from schools. "In the last days will be mockers". As Godlessness has spread in the west, so the deterioration in morals and decency has deteriorated along with it. What is right seems wrong and what is wrong seems right.If we are here for not ultimate reason and heading fast for eternal oblivion, then why bother about human decency? Just have to keep clear of the law.

Sidney Rayner, Huffington Post 19 Comments [6/26/2014 3:35:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 101688

I wish the women that run around giving the "be a man, don't hit a woman" advice would spend that time talking to girls about how to be a lady. At the beginning of the cycle that creates an abusive controlling man, is a woman. Teach women to not belittle and go for the throat every chance they get. Teach them not to put their hands a on a man if they don't want hands put on them. Teach them to get out of their emotions, step back, think about how they feel and articulate it to their man without yelling and screaming in his face or attacking his manhood. Teach them how to have enough self esteem and a better judge of character to not choose these idiots who abuse women. Teach them to stop castrating their sons mentally and emotionally, so when they grow up, they don't feel like King Kong when they hit a woman. Its on you, ladies.

Anonymous, Awesome Quotes 26 Comments [6/26/2014 3:34:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 101681

HHH, comparing Christians to Muslims, is like comparing Blacks to Gays.

It isn't fair.

Muslims and homosexuals are involved in deliberate sin.

It isn't a sin to be Black or Christian so it is unfair to compare us with these groups.

dlo_3us2001, Realabortiondebate 22 Comments [6/26/2014 3:34:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 13

Quote# 101668

[...] UOIF posted a long statement against gay marriage on its website Wednesday that stated: "If marriage between two people of the same sex becomes a norm, then all claims of equality, even the most unseemly, could one day become the norm out of the same principal," the organization wrote. "How will people be able to delegitimize bestiality and polyandry?"

[Bolding mine]

Union of Islamic Organizations in France (UOIF), Worldcrunch 32 Comments [6/26/2014 3:33:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 101621

In this case, 23-year-old Ernesto Miranda was accused of raping and kidnapping a young girl, and was arrested by police. After two hours of relatively mild questioning, Miranda admitted to the crimes with a written admission of guilt, which was then used as evidence. Naturally, he was found guilty of these crimes.
Sounds like an open-and-shut case. The man admitted to the crime. Apparently, this was not so.

The case made it all the way to the Supreme Court, where the court, in a 5-4 decision, decided that the person in question must be advised of his rights using the all too familiar four-fold refrain that we hear so often today: You have the right to remain silent; anything you say can and will be used against you; you have the right to an attorney; if you cannot afford one, one will be provided for you.
This is judicial activism at its worst.

The judges in Miranda did not interpret the Constitution so much as they ripped it up and stomped on it.

Yes, we have all of these rights. Our federal government is not allowed to usurp them. But if you don’t know them, then the fault lies with you. It is your duty to know them, not the duty of the feds to explain them to you.
Why should law and order suffer the consequences of our own criminals’ stupidity?

Which brings us back to the case of Shahzad. No, he should not be read his Miranda rights—but then again, neither should any criminal. If he chooses not to talk, then he chooses not to talk. If he asks for an attorney, then he gets an attorney. But he need not be told that he can do this. That is for him to figure out.

Tony Petersen, The Collegian at Fresno State 25 Comments [6/26/2014 3:33:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 101516

This post is very interesting to me, as I’ve had the same experience that others here, including Squire Western, have shared. Just last month, I had a 6:00 a.m. flight from Rochester, New York to Charlotte, North Carolina. While I waited at the gate, I saw two attractive young ladies dressed in pilot’s uniforms approach the counter. I was surprised at how young they seemed, and I could not take seriously the notion of them as pilots. I had seen female pilots before, but only as co-pilots, or otherwise teamed with men. As I was already anxious about the icy weather and wanted to get home, I felt relief when they turned away and headed toward another gate. I was filled with the sense of how silly it was to see these two, dressed like men with shirt and tie, pilot’s caps, lesser facsimiles of the real thing. I hearkened back to a flight long ago when I was 13, and a pilot named Captain Doubleday, whose voice came over the intercom: stern, masculine, an air of experience, yet friendly; a serious man in a serious line of work. This was comforting to a young boy who admired that captain to the point of remembering his name to this day.
When I boarded the plane about 45 minutes later, my concern renewed as I saw the two girls in the cockpit of my plane. It was a cold morning that required a de-icing treatment to the plane, and when the “captain” announced our take-off delay in her soft, elvish, girlish voice, I felt a wave of panic. Although I had awakened very early that morning with only around three hours of sleep due to a late company “Holiday” party (the holiday of course being CHRISTMAS), I did not sleep a wink during my two-hour plus flight back to Charlotte. I constantly worried, “What if there’s an emergency? How will these girls respond? Will they be able to pull a Sully Sullenberger move with his stern, calm, decisive resolve and save us if necessary? Where did they get their training? Why do both pilots have to be women? What the heck is going on here?!?” And how silly it seemed again after take-off, when the co-pilot’s voice came on in affected male “pilot” tones and inflection to make the typical announcements of flight time, weather, “enjoy the flight,” etc. I was petrified until the plane landed and my feet were on the ground.

Did they fly the plane? Yes. Did we make it in one piece? Yes. But as others have articulated, it’s not about that. It’s about an intangible sense that this just isn’t right. And among all the other concerns I have as a single father in this degenerating country, I continue to notice the upside-down world my boys will grow up in. Aging men in their fifties or obvious homosexuals are now my “flight attendant,” not stewardess, providing no genuine feminine care and comfort to weary travelers, and sexy little girls are my “captain” and co-pilot. Let me off this ride.

SLE, View from the Right 51 Comments [6/26/2014 3:33:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 26

Quote# 101478

I would like to note that this particular quote comes from a person who still uses Windows 98, hence the eye-scorching web design.


Welcome, fans and followers, to the new home of the BelchBlog. Sadly TV.com is discontinuing its user blog service; however, change is (groan) an inevitable part of life...and I have been looking to do something different with the old blog anyhow. I plan to be a better blogger--more frequent updates, more content, new location, same old me. Never fear; my pearls of wisdom have not been lost. Here's a link to The BelchBlog Archive. I apologize that it's such a mess. Maybe, if I have the time and patience, one day I'll sort it into something more readable.
But we must move on. Congratulate me, for I am 37 years old today. And in my nearly twoscore years of life one thing I have observed, with a mix of fear and disdain, is the evolution--or perhaps mutation--or the modern American feminist movement. I have noticed that angry women seem to be more the norm than the exception.
Recently Time Magazine celebrated motherhood with this eye-opening cover.
:D
Some cried this was bordering on ponography. My first thought was, "There's no way that kid got that big breast-feeding. Those little tiny tits don't look like they have enough milk in them to keep an anemic kitten alive."

Of course I had to do my own version of the cover for The Belch Dimension.
:o
So feminism celebrates motherhood now? I thought they decried pregnacy as a life-sucking cancer and marriage as slavery for women. Pick one, ladies; you can't have it both ways.

And then there's the book 50 Shades of Grey. It's an erotic novel celebrating degredation, bondage, rape, sadomachism, and basically the physical and emotional abuse of women. And it's marketed as "romantic" reading. Basically, it's everything feminism hates, being read and lauded by feminists. Hel, it's even replacing the BIble in some hotel rooms.

So what is the deal? Is the mustache brigade doing a one-eighty on everything it believes in? Has it finally admitted that its whole movement has dispensed with equal rights? Forget suffrage, forget equal pay for equal work--they now champion casual, dirty, stinking monkey sex and whipping their nips out in public. I say, good f***ing deal if you can get it.

Of course this is nothing new. I have known since I entered the dating arena as a young, virile buck some 21 years ago that the deck is stacked more in the woman's favor. I mean, think about it. When girls call up random men on the phone for sex, it's fun and cute and empowering. If a guy were to phone up a strange girl to spank one off, he would be considered a disgusting pervert and likely be arrested as a sex offender. If a girl runs out on a man for talking about his feelings, she is congratulated by her "sisters" for dumping that weak chump. if a man pulled that stunt with a woman, he would be looked at as a selfish, uncaring pig. Why is this?

I also note that the left is all for it, as long as you meet their arbitrary criteria for worth and they approve of who you wish to do it with. You needn't apply if you're too old, too physically unappealing, or don't happen to think a certain way. Theirs is a sneering elitist world of ageism and superficiality, ruled by selective outrage, pseudomoralistic sniffing, and raging hypocricy--in short, the very culture celebrated by 50 Shades and its audience of bored housewives and aging Lotharios reliving their faded glory days with this masturbatory piece of claptrap.

Of course the wild girls I knew two decades ago, who liked nothing better than sex without boundaries, now have daughters of their own. They see their teenage girls embracing the same attitudes and bitterly regret the wild seeds they sowed in their callow, ignorant youth. A few of these second-generation sluts may well find their way to the same men their mothers once enjoyed the company of--maybe a little snow on the shingles now, a few extra folds of flab around the midsection, but still that same old fire burning in the old furnace.

I say, good f***ing deal if you can get it.

Next blog: the long-awaited part one of four in my "Indian Outreach" proposal. Adios for this week.


Iconoclast, Welcome to Lemora 21 Comments [6/26/2014 3:31:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: MadmanJohnson

Quote# 101372

Why would a woman say STFU?

For a simple reason. The one we men have to imagine because we've never experienced it.

BECAUSE THEIR VOICES HAVE BEEN SILENCED AND PATRONIZED AND TRIVIALIZED AND SUPERSEDED FOR CENTURIES!

Men have no more idea what it feels like to be silenced than white people know what Jim Crow felt like.

And in THIS PARTICULAR CASE ...

Men have nothing legitimate to say. Women suffer in the millions from male sexual aggression and from being silenced about it afterwards.

And men, even apparently the "well meaning" progressives here, refuse to acknowledge the legitimacy of their suffering.

As a man, I feel deeply, deeply ashamed of what "we" do to satisfy our aggression urges.

Now, the specific question of this original diary was whether this is good tactics.

Well, what does history tell us? How many examples are there of oppressed people being delivered thru patient, silent acceptance until their oppressors decided to alleviate their suffering? Can you name one?

Protest is about raising your voice in holy, righteous anger. That's what this whole damn web site is about. No one is going to take suffering seriously until sufferers raise their voices and refuse to be silenced. If you don't get that basic dynamic, better step away from political activism.

thresholder, Daily Kos 17 Comments [6/26/2014 3:29:40 AM]
Fundie Index: -7

Quote# 101337

The bizarre behavior exhibited by the manginas in the Men's Human Rights Movement (MHRM), found at A Voice for Men (AVfM), whereby they embrace the most absurd and hateful feminist ideals regarding sex, and even more bizarrely, apply these standards to women as well, is puzzling in the extreme. After thinking long and hard about what might possess these nincompoops to behave in such a deranged manner, and rereading the Unabomber Manifesto, I think I have figured it out. I thought for a long time that they must be some kinds of autistic freaks or something, but the explanation may be found in the far more pervasive concept of oversocialization. The buffoons at AVfM fancy themselves as rebels against feminism, but of course they are nothing of the sort. They are feminists of the more extreme kind. I hate feminists, but most of them have the decency to at least back off the most absurd manifestations of their odious worldview in practice -- for example if you were to apply their sex-hostility literally to women as well as men. The buffoons in the MHRM have no such barriers. They are loose cannons among radical feminist, who will cling desperately to feminist tenets no matter how absurd it gets in the real world.

Here is yet another example of their idiocy: Boys raped more often than girls.

Any person just a few short decades ago would laugh his ass off if you told him women can "rape" boys. An honest biologist would still laugh his ass off at such an imbecile notion, as would any halfway rational or commonsensical person. Biologists know perfectly well that because the sexual superiority of women is the prime fact of life for deep evolutionary reasons, women committing "rape" or "sexual abuse" is not a meaningful natural concept but a legal fiction you have to be oversocialized to take seriously. But the manginas in the MHRM do take it seriously, because they have been oversocialized into feminist ideology.

Thus the manginas at AVfM attempt to oversocialize their natural attraction to teenage girls away (whatever age of consent local feminist legislators decree, the manginas will unquestioningly accept and internalize in the most servile fashion), since their feminist ideology will not permit them to think any "unclean thoughts." This would merely be laughable if these clowns didn't take their bizarre oversocialization one step further and insist that underage boys who get lucky with women are actually victims. And of course they also support all the hateful feminist sex laws and abuse-industry nonsense applied to men and women alike, so they are frankly as pure evil as the scumbags in law enforcement who put feminism into practice, and must be exposed as such. There is simply no nice way to put it; they are feminist scum.

I suppose the Unabomber has correctly identified this as a leftist phenomenon. A leftist is above all else a conformist. The leftist does not think for himself; he merely absorbs the political correctness of his times, and if these ideals conflict with human nature, then human nature be damned. And in this day and age, the pinnacle of political correctness is the ideology of ubiquitous sexual "abuse" (or usually and increasingly just called "rape" regardless of the details). The more socialized you are, the more you see "rape" or "sexual abuse" everywhere, until "abuse" encapsulates all of human sexuality (and beyond -- as even an image of a baby breastfeeding can qualify). With sufficient oversocialization, it is even possible to insist on the existence of female sexual abusers with a straight face. This is the pathogenesis of the female sex-offender charade, which has caused me so much headache. Never mind that common sense, natural science and experience all tell us it is preposterous to hold women culpable for sex crimes. The oversocialized leftist mangina will insist on his internalized politically correct hogwash even if all his senses and reason as well as science contradict him. Thanks to the Unabomber for identifying the word for it. I know my ranting against the female sex-offender charade for the umpteenth time probably won't sway any of the manginas, but at least now we know what to call the phenomenon that rots their brains.

The Unabomber is brilliant in some ways, foolish in others. One way he was wrong was thinking he had to kill people in order to get his message out. With writing skills like his, there is no need for violence, at least not in the Internet age. Rather than wasting away in a supermax prison, he could have had a popular blog now if he had only waited for the rise of the Internet. It is also completely unnecessary to use violence to bring down industrial civilization, since peak oil will take care of that beautifully. Soon there will be no occasion for what the Unabomber derides as "surrogate activities," as any survivors of the imminent Malthusian catastrophe will have no choice but to struggle to stay alive by the sweat of our brows, rather than leisurely sit by as fossil fuel slaves do the work. My attitude now that I am aware of peak oil is that unless you are already incarcerated, then insurrection against the feminist establishment is largely superfluous.

As I have said before, the Men's Rights Movement has not grown. There are only 3 sex-positive MRA sites that I know of beside myself: The Anti-Feminist, Human Stupidity and Angry Harry. The rest is merely feminist oversocialization, although I suppose The Spearhead should get an honorable mention for lately at least somewhat acknowledging the insanity of feminist sex-hostility as codified in law, as well as the foolishness, if not the biological absurdity, of men trying to assume the role of victims of rape by women (Price has, however, written some embarrassingly naive articles on the female sex-offender charade in the past where he has parroted the feminist narrative in much the same way as AVfM). I have no hope that there will ever be an effective Men's Rights Movement, but we don't need it anyway, because with peak oil comes peak feminism. If the feminists and manginas want to do something enduring for their cause, they might get busy trying to figure out how to keep up mass incarceration in a low-energy world. Rather than dreaming up ways to identify more sex offenders, they ought to be seriously worried about how to even keep the sex offenders they got incarcerated long enough to serve out their sentences. John Michael Greer has got a post up about seven sustainable technologies that may be practiced in our low-energy future, and the industrial prison system is not among them. I don't see how anything like the feminist sex abuse industry can possibly exist without the abundant energy flows provided by fossil fuels. Look back to the prison population in the era before fossil fuels, and you get an idea of how many people a low-energy society is capable of imprisoning. It is no accident that mass incarceration was unheard of before the Industrial Revolution, and for most of history, incarceration wasn't even recognized as a standard punishment. (Slavery did exist, and can in theory arise again if most of the prisoners are coerced into manual agriculture, but there will be insufficient energy available to make the transition to sustainable slavery in our coming dark ages, not least because the feminists don't even realize that time is running out for reorganizing their infrastructure if that were to be accomplished). Since the prison is a cornerstone of feminist society, there is reason to rejoice even as all the things we care about and depend on are about to disintegrate. Technology has been convenient and fun, but we also see what kind of sex-hostile dystopia it leads to, which gets worse for every passing year. So perhaps peak oil is a good thing even with the extreme hardship and die-off it necessarily entails, because the alternative for men is surely prison unless you put on the charade of an oversocialized mangina.

Eivind Berge, Eivind Berge 21 Comments [6/26/2014 3:29:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 18

Quote# 101242

A group of Christians say Wales's national flag is "demonic" and should be changed.

The Welsh Christian Party claims the red dragon on the nation's standard is at odds with the country's position as a Christian nation. It wants the flag to be replaced with the black and gold cross of St David.

Party leader the Rev George Hargreaves said a symbol of the devil should not "reign over Wales for another moment". He said: "Wales is the only country in history to have a red dragon on its national flag.

"This is the very symbol of the devil described in the Book of Revelation 12:3. This is nothing less than the sign of Satan, the devil, Lucifer, that ancient serpent who deceived Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden."

The party has launched an online petition calling for a referendum to allow the Welsh people to decide which flag they would prefer.

Historians and even fellow Christians said the symbol of the dragon had a "long tradition" in Wales and was a source of pride.


Welsh Christian Party, Huffington Post 27 Comments [6/26/2014 3:27:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: ThroningErmine8

Quote# 101139

The reason I don't buy girl scout cookies anymore is one, I can buy virtually the same thin mints at the dollar store for $1, and as an economist I find this reasonable and overcome the urge to fork out three to four times that much to some lovely little girls who remind me of mine at that age. Secondly, I have read enough to know that the girl scouts like their counter-parts the boy scouts albeit differently, have become indoctrination centers for liberal theology assuredly very different than that of their founding. The whole country seems to be upside-down and backwards. My grandmother was gay, now it means one of two absurdities or abnormalities. Bad economics is now good economics and thus it's good to go on welfare and receive money for something one does not do. Racism is now anytime a conservative disagrees with a liberal minority and MLK's preference for character over color has been twisted to become racial preference, embracing bad behavior over good. I'm thinking seriously about becoming an expatriate for the remainder of my life. I can't take much more of this nonsense. Twisting what was to teach little girls about becoming women into indoctrination into "femi-nazis"...well, they've gone too far in my book. I have no problem with a woman earning a fair wage for their work as compared to the average man (which seems to be the issue today), if they are qualified and all else remains the same (which it usually isn't in the real world, because women bear the children and don't have the right physique for the army or the fire department), but I do have a big problem with the in-your-face tactics of the left and the "let's pass it to find out what's in it" crowd. Enough already. God bless you little girls, but I'm not paying ludicrous prices to support ideology to which I am opposed. Perhaps you'll wake up, perhaps you won't, but I for one am heading down another pathway.

Steve Tanton, The New Yorker 21 Comments [6/26/2014 3:27:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 101038

It's time for all of us to understand that we are at war, and lives are at stake.

The enemy - the self-worshipping death cult known as modern liberalism - has become increasingly vile, violent, and deceitful, and so we must become increasingly bold, fearless, and aggressive in our response.

[Walsh links to and comments on the video of Emily Letts' abortion.]

Let you think that dear Emily represents the fringe of the abortion movement, consider that many mainstream leftwing blogs have seized on this video and passionately defended it. But, if you're paying attention, you already know that this woman is not on the fringe, because there is no fringe. All abortion advocacy is extremism. It is impossible to be moderately in favor of abortion, just as it is impossible to be moderately opposed to it. Seeking a middle ground on abortion is like searching for a middle ground on slavery or genocide. It doesn't exist, and those who wish to find it will inevitably end up in favor, and those in favor of murderous atrocities are always extremely in favor of murderous atrocities. Your acceptance - however moderate - of a deep and depraved evil, will color your soul in blackness, and send you barreling into a darkness that will utterly distort your moral compass, leading you to bow at the altar of the Culture of Death, where abortion is the highest sacrament.

Your conscience is not a lunch tray, with all the different components separated into their own compartments. Your conscience is a bucket, and everything you dump into it will mingle and mix with everything else. The point is, if you pour an acceptance of child murder into your bucket, it will poison everything else, and soon even the good parts will be colored and tainted by your tacit endorsement of violence against the innocent. It changes you, and how you see the world. This will happen. There is no way around it. Anyone who celebrates or endorses abortion, but then pretends to recoil at any other form of murder, is lying. They are lying to themselves, and to you. They are liars, and I will call them that, without apology.

Matt Walsh, The Matt Walsh Blog 14 Comments [6/26/2014 3:26:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 101024

JEWISH DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA

HOW HAVE THE JEWS destroyed America? Let us count the ways:

- Jews Are The Main Pushers Of Homosexual Activity.

- Jews Brought In Multiple Creeds via Their Open Immigration Law of 1965.

- Jews Offshore US Jobs via Jewish Wall Street.

- Jews Have Accelerated Inflation via The Federal Reserve.

- Jews Have Created a Jewish Police State via Homeland Security.

- Jews Form Public Opinion via TOTAL Ownership of the Main Stream Media.

- Jews Blackball Christian Groups via Homeland Security.

- Jews Litigate Against Christian Symbols in the Public Square.

- Jews Celebrate Passover In The White House But Forbid Easter Services.

- Jews Control Capitol Hill via AIPAC, ADL, and Sheldon Adelson.

- Jews Manipulate Elections via Money & Media.

- Jews Corrupt The Youth via Jew-owned Hollywood and the Music Industry.

THIS IS ONLY the tip of the iceberg of the Jewish ruination of America.

Where are the leaders of yesteryear?

Men like Robert E Lee, William Howard Taft, and Louis Thomas McFadden will never be seen again. Now we're stuck with Jews, queers, and incompetent women.

Wake up America! Jews have destroyed your country!

Brother Nathanael Kapner, Real Jew News 25 Comments [6/26/2014 3:20:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Wykked Wytch

Quote# 100897

Is there no end to the pathological narcissism and delusions of grandeur of women these days?

Fifty years ago a simple request would buy you a virgin to go to the prom with you, to be enjoyably deflowered afterward.

Now young men must arrange a small-scale romantic comedy scene in real life, accompanied with a golden carriage and a regiment of Beefeaters, in order to win the hand of a stuck up ice queen who's already been raw-dogged by every football player and bad boy in the school, who will promptly ditch you the moment you walk in the door to find a bathroom trash can in which to deposit the newborn bastard.

As women's values continue to drop precipitously into the negative, their expectations continue to skyrocket.

Meanwhile the football jock with a single digit IQ has already penetrated your "queen" in every orifice at no expense and with no effort.

Fuck do I ever feel for boys who are in high school these days. They are getting the red pill earlier and earlier with each passing year.

MPAV8R, MGTOW HQ 29 Comments [6/26/2014 3:19:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 19
Submitted By: Rabbit of Caerbannog