Quote# 92280

An evangelist who visits Russia frequently believes the move afoot there to ban the public display of homosexuality is because the nation's leaders -- both political and religious -- have seen the damage American culture has suffered from the homosexual movement.

As an evangelist who works in Russia, Tim Todd tells OneNewsNow that is quite a contrast to America, which has the most pro-homosexual president in the country's history. Todd, who heads Revival Fires International and has worked in Russia, understands that country's stand against the homosexual agenda.

"America is opening the floodgate -- and if you want to know what God thinks about the sin of homosexuality, you can look at his urban renewal development plan in Sodom and Gomorrah," he points out. "It gives you a pretty good idea."

Todd says Russia has had an opportunity for years now to observe the homosexual agenda in America and Europe and learn firsthand what it has done to the culture.

"[In America] there is open, blatant homosexuality on television and on the Internet where the homosexuals have come out of their hideouts in publicly proclaiming their sinful activity," he observes.

Todd adds that he believes Russia has known all along the detriment homosexuality has on society -- and now they have proof in the United States.


Tim Todd, One News Now 37 Comments [1/26/2013 4:09:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 30
Submitted By: Aspergus

Quote# 92277

In 2007 the Texas Legislature passed a law encouraging the state’s public schools to teach about the influence of the Bible in history and literature. Schools can do that either by weaving such instruction into existing social studies and literature courses, or they can create full courses about the Bible. Today the Texas Freedom Network Education Fund released a report, authored by a religious studies professor at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, that examines what students are learning in the 57 school districts and three charter schools that teach Bible courses. Examples from Texas public schools:

•Instructional material in two school districts teach that racial diversity today can be traced back to Noah’s sons, a long-discredited claim that has been a foundational component of some forms of racism.

•Religious bias is common, with most courses taught from a Protestant — often a conservative Protestant — perspective. One course, for example, assumes Christians will at some point be “raptured.” Materials include a Venn diagram showing the pros and cons of theories that posit the rapture before the returning Jesus’ 1,000-year reign and those that place it afterward. In many courses, the perspectives of Roman Catholics, Orthodox Christians and Jews are often left out.

•Anti-Jewish bias — intentional or not — is not uncommon. Some courses even portray Judaism as a flawed and incomplete religion that has been replaced by Christianity.

•Many courses suggest or openly claim that the Bible is literally true. “The Bible is the written word of God,” students are told in one PowerPoint presentation. Some courses go so far as to suggest that the Bible can be used to verify events in history. One district, for example, teaches students that the Bible’s historical claims are largely beyond question by listing biblical events side by side with historical developments from around the globe.

•Course materials in numerous classes are designed to evangelize rather than provide an objective study of the Bible’s influence. A book in one district makes its purpose clear in the preface: “May this study be of value to you. May you fully come to believe that ‘Jesus is the Christ, the son of God.’ And may you have ‘life in His name.’”

•A number of courses teach students that the Bible proves Earth is just 6,000 years old.

•Students are taught that the United States is a Christian nation founded on the Christian biblical principles taught in their classrooms.

•Academic rigor is so poor that many courses rely mostly on memorization of Bible verses and factoids from Bible stories rather than teaching students how to analyze what they are studying. One district relies heavily on Bible cartoons from Hanna-Barbera for its high school class. Students in another district spend two days watching what lesson plans describe a “the historic documentary Ancient Aliens,” which presents “a new interpretation of angelic beings described as extraterrestrials.”

Texas Public Schools, TFN Insider 80 Comments [1/25/2013 4:28:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 91

Quote# 92273

I instantly dismiss most science - unless I know the scientist involved has a strong faith in our Lord. Science without god is clearly wrong - that is why we need to make sure our children learn more about God than about science theorys dreamed up by athiest scientists.

Wainthrop, Daily Mail 38 Comments [1/25/2013 4:27:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 54
Submitted By: AM

Quote# 92269

[Wyatt Junker explains evolution.]

The theory of Dumb Design is based on years of retards humping retards and them forming newer retards with cooler retard shit add-ons. And these retards decide 'Hey, I like that last retard's weird extra finger. I'm gonna F me that retard so my kids can have an extra finger to help pop off Lucky Lager bottlecaps with.' Makes sense. Who wouldn't want an easier way to get at beer faster? You see, these retards are smart. The ones with fewer fingers also die off faster because they have less speedy access to more beer. So there's less in the gene pool to go around on that front too, since beer is power, its also prestige.

But what about all the retards who don't like beer? What about the ones who like wine coolers? They have screw offs. No church key required. They can also bogart box wine too, cause they're retards, they can actually just ram a fishing knife into the side of the box and then fall onto their knees and let the nectar just fall right into their open mouths for quick release. No new finger required. So those retards won't need to F the new freak on the block.

So it really just comes down to a war between beer and wine in the end. And who Fs who the fastest wins to create the bigger, meaner faster tard drinking alcoholic.

Wyatt Junker, Where Liberty Dwells 49 Comments [1/25/2013 4:25:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 68
Submitted By: Rabbit of Caerbannog

Quote# 92268

Earth to ETB (Evolutionism True Believer): science, pure science, seeks answers no matter what those answers might be. It does NOT rule out any answer for philosophical or ideological reasons. If all the research and studies and evidence point to an inevitable conclusion that this or that cannot possibly be explained other than by design, it is NOT scientific to reject that conclusion because one doesn't happen to like it.

[...]

Evolutionism is a mindless, cultic religion that would rather believe in fairy tales than in what the evidence clearly demonstrates.

[...]

You are "blocking its teaching" because you cannot disprove intelligent design coldly, logically and intellectually. If you ETBs were so bloody sure of your egregious mythology, you would welcome the opportunity to confront creationism and intelligent design in the classrooms and thoroughly disprove it. But you don't. Why is that?

The simple answer: ETBs are of a single mindset: "We cannot possibly refute what they are saying based on the existing evidence, so we will use the legislatures and the courts to censor all opposing viewpoints and enforce exclusivity for our outrageous pseudoscience."

And ETBs have the brass balls to call their fabulous fiction a "science".

DoctorDoom, Where Liberty Dwells 41 Comments [1/25/2013 4:25:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 40
Submitted By: Rabbit of Caerbannog

Quote# 92267

[About Zack Kopplin, an anti-Creationist activist from Louisiana.]

Hey Kopplin, you little faggot, how about we get rid of non-science text books like evolution and global warming in equal amounts as getting rid of creationism? So, your idea of 'science' we chuck in the same rate of speed & amount that we ditch any other to the point where we don't admit any viewpoints(counter or non) at all into the science classroom and instead just call it art or PE or social studies?

So, if you don't want intelligent design, then we don't want dumb design either. No retard design. I know you like retard design. But the only problem with it is that the dude with Downs Syndrome should be the smartest guy in the room. But... he's not. So, let's get rid of your precious 'science' as well dipshit, along with intelligent design.

The only thing allowed? It has to be immediately replicable. Until then F off.

Wyatt Junker, Where Liberty Dwells 30 Comments [1/25/2013 4:24:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 51
Submitted By: Rabbit of Caerbannog

Quote# 92265

My friends, understand the gravity of what I am saying. If the First Amendment falls to the “gays” like the Magna Charta did, true human rights will be finished in America (and by extension the rest of the western world). There is no fall-back position. The First Amendment is the last bastion of freedom for Christians. If it fails, serious persecution of all who dare to speak the truth of the Bible will follow close behind. Pray fervently that it will stand!

Scott Lively, Defend the Family 47 Comments [1/25/2013 4:24:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 29
Submitted By: Zagen30

Quote# 92175

I don’t under this. What does your being gay or not gay have anything to do with this poem? You seem to bring down ‘love’ to our mere human love (which is a shadow of divine love) or, worse, to sexual love (which is not ‘love’ of the Bible).
‘Our civilization is threatened by gays’ – in a sense it’s true. Suppose everyone is gay – where would be our next generation? It’s like China syndrome. They want to have only a son (with gender-cide of unborn baby girls by systematic abortion with prenatal ultrasound exam diagnosis). Then, where would be families and next generation? Is it different than a scenario of an end of human civilization, and humanity itself?
Homosexuality is as much as sin as humanity itself, when it is divorced from the Creator God. It is homosexualism that is sin. Homosexuality is what they may be; homosexualism is what they choose to be bound in slavery – homosexual behavior, conduct, life style, culture with gay agenda, politics, militant gay movement and ideology. They bring their own condemnation on themselves and trying to blame others (who cannot be angelic to them) and trying to read the Bible to justify their life of homo hedonicus as well practiced in the culture of Greek and Romans. Some even wrote a book ‘Gay Spirituality’. What does have sodomy and physical pleasure have anything to do with spirituality? Let each concentrate on one’s own spiritual journey? Yeah, it sounds much like a spiritism. BTW, spirituality is not something you do in spiritual style/area; it is the spiritual reality, that is, God Himself.

ounbbl , Kimberly Knight: Coming Out Christian 24 Comments [1/25/2013 4:23:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 29

Quote# 91562

Watching the Memorial service for the twenty-six precious lives taken from us was painful to say the least, but it was far more painful to the God who made America great. Newtown cancelled Christmas so it could properly mourn. How foolish, yet typical of governmental strategy to replace God. The "Interfaith" service was an affront to Almighty God. Those claiming to be His priests barely mentioned His Name --Jesus! After all, He is the only God there is!

"My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge, I also reject you as my priests; because you have ignored the law of your God, I also will ignore your children." Hosea 4:6.

Can there be any doubt in anyone's mind today that America is in deep trouble? Blood is coursing down the corridors of our schools, workplaces, and streets and we look at each other with awkward amazement wondering what in the world has happened to us. We are being drained of every last penny of our wealth. We are losing our kids to gangs, drugs, violence, suicide, murder and every imaginable trivial pursuit. Our schools have become veritable jungles where survival of the fittest is the law of the hallway.

What happened? We violently removed the fear of Almighty God from the hearts of our children. We expelled God from school and banished Him from the schoolyard. He was replaced with metal detectors, condoms, policemen, anti-bullying policies, No-gun zones, and violence of unprecedented order. Our strategy has replaced God's Truth. We are losing our kids because we are ignoring God's Law.

Operation Save America, Right Wing Watch 36 Comments [1/25/2013 4:21:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 38

Quote# 92257

[> “If I plate a bacteria out, blot it on ten different plates - then subject it to ten different stresses - I will get a heat resistant strain through evolution, a cold resistant strain through evolution, an antibiotic resistant strain, etc, etc.”]

Yes but you still have bacteria. You don’t have an amoeba and yet left-wing anti-God evolutionists will project frogs and fish from such experiments.

What you are describing is natural selection, a generational form of adaptation.

If I work out passionately with heavy weights I can metamorphose to something in a category more akin to a Mr. Universe.

If I equip a room with heavy weight lifting equipment and teach weight lifting then I am a progenitor of buff persons, a form of natural selection because they came to me of their own will influenced by external causes such as primitive urges to mate with stronger partners (from the physical perspective). But still they are humans.

The evolutionists that stretch natural selection, survival of the fittest and metamorphosis into a theory of ape to man have twisted scientific results to fit their atheistic or satanic beliefs. They are simply against God and want nothing more than to use science to further their anti-God agenda.

“CE”, “BCE”, Remove “Under God” from the Pledge, etc. and “Evolution” are all part of the same schtick of persons who think they are somehow superior and who find Christians to be an easy target to treat with their particular form of torment.

Evolution is not, has never been and will never be proven. The maximum likelihood statistical estimates used to posit evolutionary trees based on any number of observances such as genetic variation or single nucleotide polymorphisms DO NOT ADD UP to any form of proof that God never existed, that Adam was a fable, the flood never occurred or that Christ never conquered death. In fact one could say or think that Christ’s resurrection is a metamorphosis of earthly spiritual death back to spiritual immortality. And if you think things of the ‘spirit’ do not exist, you are blind. Within humanity it is all around you. Spirit and soul are just as tangible as flesh and blood, and are manifested in Good and Evil.

So yes we can go into the lab and perform genetic crossovers or gene knockout/insertion experiments and watch yeast or whatever model transform itself into more adaptable organisms of the same type. We have proved nothing in regards to God except that by concluding from such experiments that God does not exist we merely prove ourselves to be spiritual retards.

‘Spirit’ exists and is just as verifiable as your bacteria. Try doing a little ‘Science’ on the many species of ‘Spirit’ and you will end up in politics. Hopefully you will find the Bible to be your code map. Good luck or should I say God be with you and ‘select’ you to His will, blessing you with real worth rather than leaving you to continue with your effing little pissant rant against Christianity using ‘Evolution’ as your creed.


Hostage, Free Republic 58 Comments [1/24/2013 4:35:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 53

Quote# 92256

There's a reason it is called the LAW of Gravity. Gravity has been proven. Evolution has not. Evolution is a theory; gravity is a law. Gravity can be prove without faith in it; evolution cannot.

What definitive evidence is there evolution exists? Where are the fossils definitively linking monkeys to man or dinosaurs to chickens? It seems in every instance there is a missing link? How is an eye created, or what makes an eye even work. Where are the animals with precursors to eyes so we can see what came before the eye?

Where are the fossils of cats with wings? Where is the evidence life can be created from randomly exploding matter ala Big Bang?

Isn't natural selection and survival of the fittest the underlying current of evolution? I find it laughable one could believe that all of these things happen to come about perfect and right each and every time without Divine intervention. Probability would indicate that at least once we would find some developed species like a dog with gills, or even the fossils of a failed species of like nature. There is no evidence or observation of such.....it is blind faith evolution must be so.

Repeat Offender, Free Republic 44 Comments [1/24/2013 4:35:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 45

Quote# 92254

["Hitler believed in fixed kinds and that Germans were created in the highest image of God. Creationism is only a prominent belief in America among the less educated."]

Actually, Hitler strongly believed in evolution and that since in evolution some are perforce more evolved than others, equality of the races is illogical ....which squares entirely with Darwin's evolutionary ideas.

Hopefully your scientific research is more meticulous than your historical research.

cookcounty, Free Republic 34 Comments [1/24/2013 4:34:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 50

Quote# 92252

Exactly.. the american people have deemed to PUNISH themselves for four more years with BArry Half-White..
I agree with their choice.. they NEED to be PUNISHED..

Punished for far more than 75,000,000+ brutal deaths of their own babies..
But for brutal enslavement of a good bit of the populace..
And.. the wholesale looting of the National Treasury..

There are many more “crimes” to be accounted for than I am willing to number..
Suffice it to say America desperately NEEDS PUNISHMENT..

American voters generally have become political “MASOCHISTS”...
The list of democrat “SADIST” groups are not lacking..
There is a kind of symbiosis in that..

Note: It appears that many of my “neighbors” are a strange lot.. but they know what they want.. and what they want is financial and political PAIN.. SO BE IT!.. They do deserve it..


hosepipe, Free Republic 40 Comments [1/24/2013 4:34:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 47

Quote# 92251

You claim that you “hear” what I write, but it’s clear that you suffer the same reading comprehension problems from which all Propagandists suffer: you “hear” only what your schemes permit you to hear; you “see” only what your schemes permit you to see.

You allege that Creationism “as defined” is useless. “As defined” by whom? Your allegation “as defined” is an abject confession that you can only proceed if you are allowed to dictate terms and meanings, and your incessant crying and moaning is an abject confession that you are aware that you are not being allowed to advance your propaganda unopposed. And in front of the entire Forum assembly too! How shameful and embarrassing for you!

Now, you allege that my use of definitions is “non standard.” Which definitions?
the Compact Oxford English Dictionary, revised edition 2003?
the Webster’s Universal Dictionary of the English Language, unabridged, 1937?
the The original 1828 Webster’s Dictionary?
the Merriam-Webster's Dictionary, 11th Edition – which shows no change since 1880?
the Webster's New World College Dictionary, 4th Ed. 2005?
the The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000.?
the Webster's Revised Unabridged, 1913 Edition?
or, perhaps the CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA?
How are they “non standard”? Do you rate yourself superior to all the authorities represented by the above publications? By whose authority are they deemed “non standard”? Explain in detail how this is so, or stand exposed as a fraud.

You are quite correct in saying that Christianity and Creationism are not synonymous. Of course not. Creationism is a tenet of Christianity; the most important tenet; That the Judeo-Christian God is the Creator of the Universe, and of Mankind. What is your point in asserting something not in dispute? Do you think it somehow salvages your soiled reputation?

YHAOS, Free Republic 18 Comments [1/24/2013 4:34:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 36

Quote# 92250

What I find troubling is that this student activist [Zack Kopplin] claims to be a champion of science yet makes very unscientific claims such the one where he suggests that if a child is not taught a strict narrow secular/atheist form of evolution in a public school they will not be able to operate as a research scientist or save wetlands. It is not only unscientific but patently untrue. The bulk of the scienitists that produced our modern world of science and medicine were believers in creation even if they all weren’t creationists in the very narrow interpretation that the scientific left wish to lump all creationists into which is the “young earth” creationists.

The truth is I don’t much care but I will err on the side of freedom. If public funds can be used to promote a liberal political agenda in schools let us have an open playing field. Kids will grow up and what they learn or do not learn about evolution or any number of other topics will not prevent them from achieving success if they are worthy of it. Given the amount of crap that passes for science and education in public schools and I’m intimately familiar because I did attend them I don’t believe allowing public funds to teach kids in ways approved by their parents is a threat at all. The world will go on and the technical aspects of biology will not change either way. I don’t understand the fear myself. It is irrational just as this student activist is an irrational moron who commits the same sins of ignorance that he sees in his opponents.


Maelstorm, Free Republic 21 Comments [1/24/2013 4:34:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 23

Quote# 92249

[re: E=mc²]

Science fiction is great stuff ... as long as one doesn't start believing it, or allow it to take time away from truths, such as the Bible. Suppose I drink a glass of water, which has mass of about 0.5 pounds (roughly 1 kg). Zero calories, of course. Yet do you maintain that my energy increases in proportion to the speed of light squared?

What percentage of people who believe relativity's crass, silly materialism are likely to read the Bible earnestly, or pursue other real truths?

Andy Schlafly, Conservapedia 59 Comments [1/24/2013 4:33:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 75
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 92241

(Part of a much larger post)

You must have sex with him. The problem is that most men find grudging, duty sex from their wives unappealing. Your husband would like to feel that you are actually attracted to and aroused by him. Therefore, you will need to increase your attraction to him, and here is why. It is not for your satisfaction and fulfillment, it is for his. I say this in love, but understand that you are a whore and you deserve to be dragged to the city gates, stoned to death, and cast into hell. But Jesus Christ has paid the sin debt that you owe, and now that you are in Him, you are no longer condemned to be cast into hell. Your man was willing to take you into his home and give you his name. You are blessed to have him and you will now set aside your lusting after personal happiness and instead seek to obey the Lord by pleasing your husband. You will please him by being sexually attracted to him.

You must behave as if he were far above you on the sexual attractiveness scale, and this is not to be about his looks. This will be an attempt to recalibrate what you find sexually attractive, and you must do these things while beseeching our gracious Heavenly Father to rewire your brain so as to remove or reduce the effects of sleeping with other, more alpha men so that you may please your husband by becoming sexually attracted to him.

sunshinemary, The Woman And The Dragon 63 Comments [1/24/2013 4:33:14 AM]
Fundie Index: 91
Submitted By: Balthazar The Wise

Quote# 92240

Public schools, and secular universities, are liberal think tanks and brainwashing barrels for the masses. They no longer teach a neutral education; everything is slanted for the left. It's boiling down to becoming either a born again believer or pagan zombie.

Buzzardhut, Rapture Ready 58 Comments [1/23/2013 4:11:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 54

Quote# 92230


Don't you love it, when they try to equate hating sinful behavior with hating the person?

The reason why I hate homosexuality and read very carefully! It is a behavior that marks rebellion against God and rejection of His word!

Homosexuality and its attendant behaviors--crossdressing etc is worship of self. Putting oneself and sexuality ahead of God. It is the most liberal Christians that whine for special protection and rights for this indecent behavior. It's not normal and it's self destructive. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that its harmful.

Trying the normalize this behavior and say it's OK is the most unloving thing you can do for someone trapped in this sin.

Let's use the example of the alcoholic:

Al loves his bottle. He takes it every where he goes. His freinds don't want to offend him or confront him about his getting drunk all the time. "He not hurting anyone", says his brother. Al spends all his personal time drinking. His freind even buy him wine and beer at social functions and weddings. He is even developing liver disease because of his habit. Despite this, Al manages to be sober enough in the morning to hold down his janitor's job. Now are Al's friend doing him any favors? Remember, this is a behavior pattern. It's debatable if given the right conditions that Al may have avoided this.

The truth is Al's family and friends are not doing him any favors by not getting him any help. That same is true of the homosexual. We have become a society of enablers. We enable people to live self destructive lifestyles instead of helping them deal with their sin.

Inzl Kett, Theology Online 60 Comments [1/23/2013 4:07:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 45
Submitted By: Persephone 66

Quote# 92223

You’re walking down a deserted street with your wife and two small children.

Suddenly, an Islamic terrorist with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities, praises Allah, raises the knife, and charges at you. You are carrying a Glock .40 caliber, and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family.

What do you do?

Republican/Conservative Answer:

BANG


Democrat/Liberal Answer:

Well, that’s not enough information to answer the question!

Does the man look poor or oppressed?

Have I ever done anything to him that would inspire him to attack?

Could we run away?

What does my wife think?

What about the kids?

Could I possibly swing the gun like a club and knock the knife out of his hand?

What does the law say about this situation?

Does the Glock have appropriate safety built into it?

Why am I carrying a loaded gun anyway, and what kind of message does this send to society and to my children?

Is it possible he’d be happy with just killing me?


Texan Answer:

BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! Click... (Sounds of reloading)

BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! Click... “Damn! I’m out!”

Daughter: “Nice pattern, Daddy! Were those the Silver Tips, Black Talons, or hollow points?”

Son: “Can I shoot the next one, Daddy?”

Wife: “You ain’t takin’ THAT to no Taxidermist!”

DoctorDoom, Where Liberty Dwells 123 Comments [1/22/2013 4:45:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 79

Quote# 92218

Putting a fine point on it: Back to the OP.

The point is that the FI causes hypergamy and/or the woman’s interests to literally BECOME Christian sexual “morality”.

Thus the FI says: Hypergamy is moral. I am God’s daughter. God wants the best for his special princess. God is not a man that He should lie. God knew me before I was formed in my mother’s womb. God will provide. Therefore, God will give me the best.

Premarital sex is moral as long as he and I do not have sex with anyone else. If he is only having sex with me, then he is “invested” in me and “committed” to me, because if he wasn’t invested and committed, he could have sex with me and with other women. And if he is invested and committed, then that means he loves me. And I would not have sex with him if I did not love him. And if he loves me and I love him, then it is of God and therefore is moral, because God is love.

Serial monogamy is moral. I can marry the “best” man, and I can stay married to him, until he is not “the best” man. If a man is not “the best”, then I should not marry him. And if I do marry him and he is not perfect or “the best”, then God will release me from that marriage and free me to find “the best” and “the One”.

Divorce is moral. God provides “peace that surpasses all understanding” and “joy unspeakable”. Therefore, God wants me to be happy. Anything that makes me unhappy, or that does not make me happy, is not ordained of God. I am unhaaaaaappy in my marriage. Therefore, anything that alleviates that unhaaaaaappiness is moral. Therefore, at least under these (my) circumstances, divorce is moral.


deti, Dalrock 36 Comments [1/22/2013 4:44:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 39
Submitted By: Balthazar The Wise

Quote# 92210

It occurs to me that gun owners are the new persecuted blacks of the 60s. The Democrats in the KKK in the 60s persecuted blacks, and now the modern-day version of the Democrat KKK is persecuting gun owners.

I guess we need a Martin Luther King, Jr. to help us keep our Constitutional right to keep and bear arms.

Marmo, Moonbattery 54 Comments [1/22/2013 4:42:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 53

Quote# 92207

[I've always felt that it would be significant when we would see a shift to the E.U. instigating a peace plan rather than the U.S. so this may be a big turning point.]

Honestly, although I knew the AntiChrist would come from Europe, I never postulated this shift of focus over to the EU - so it took me by surprise.

Ponder this: The EU is clear about not dilly-dallying like years past. They're determined to set something on the table that the international community can sign onto, and get it done by the end of the year. They're not interested in failed peace talks after failed peace talks lasting years - they want it done. Whatever reason they want it done so quickly? I don't know. But now that attention is focusing on the EU, I can't picture a constant back-and-forth and up-and-down like we've had for years between America/Israel/PA. The new kid is in town.

Praise the LORD. Yet more reminders of how REAL this all really is. Maranatha!

Rei, Rapture Ready 54 Comments [1/21/2013 4:39:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 47
Submitted By: dylanstrategie

Quote# 92202

"Science is of use in explaining and predicting the natural world. Creationism is useless."

Science knows how to kill an unborn child. It takes Creationism to teach us that abortion is generally, if not categorically wrong.

YHAOS, Free Republic 43 Comments [1/21/2013 4:37:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 58

Quote# 92201

[re. Zack Kopplin, an anti-Creationist activist from Louisiana.]

Well one thing this kid needs to learn is it is the THEORY of evolution - not LAW; so don't act like there is nothing to challenge evolution. Can there not be another "theory?"
The fossil record doesn't support half the nonsense evolutionists come up with, no one has ever proven a Big Bang, and I don't see any dogs with gills, or talking fish - their fossils seem to have disappeared too.

And strangely enough animals seem to decide to wallow over to one area and die in large groups so their fossils can be found together. Fossilized trees have been found that extend through multiple layers of sediment - you know that stuff that take millions of years to deposit, because trees can grow with fossilized roots, because they evolved that way.

And clams at one time had legs, but evolution said they didn't need them which is why seashells are found near the top of Mt. Everest - definitely a more plausible story than a catastrophic event such as a flood of Noah's Ark proportions.

Cannot a competing "theory" held by a considerable number of Americans also be taught as well?

Repeat Offender, Free Republic 49 Comments [1/21/2013 4:37:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 65