Quote# 76205

Natural sexual activity are those acts between an adult male (preferably 25 years of age or older with reasonable financial stability and maturity) and a female who has reached an age of sufficient maturity to responsibly bear children as God wills (husband and his wife).
Procreation may not by intent be excluded whether by natural means or artificial means. Scriptural limits are set upon the days of a woman's cycle when sexual intercourse is permissible. Probable fertility occurs at the beginning of the permissible duration for moral intercourse as shown in the story of Bathsheba's pregnancy.
All focused ejaculations of a human male must be deposited within the vagina of a mature human female. The activity may not have been intentionally rendered infertile either by the male or the female. A woman may only receive sperm from a human male in the approved natural manner. All other two party (human or lower animal) sexual activity wherein one or both participants are human is condemned as unnatural. All sexual activity between near relatives or where one is a minor is condemned even if otherwise considered as natural.

Father David C. Trosch, Life Enterprises Unlimited 97 Comments [9/21/2010 5:30:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 105

Quote# 76151

In the darkest days of the War on Terror and during the worst of it in Iraq when our soldiers and Marines and the Iraqi people could’ve used any help they could get, the anti-American Leftists who currently infest the film-making community sided with our enemy through the production of one propaganda piece of moral equivalence after another; a celluloid flood of dishonest, divisive and morally illiterate films each created with the obvious intent of undermining America’s resolve to defeat terrorism and to create an ally in the Middle East through the righteous (and costly) liberation of the Iraqi and Afghan people. Furthermore, through a number of insidious documentaries, one of the freest and wealthiest industries in all of human history spent millions to produce and promote the worst of America through the creation of cinematic mountains based on conspiratorial mole hills.

To further their nihilist agenda, Leftist Hollywood would see 25 million innocent Iraqis abandoned into a meat grinder of terrorism and death squads. Most unforgivably, in film after film after film, these moral degenerates have attacked our troops as dupes, victims, monsters, and no better than the enemy.

This hasn’t been the work of just edgy, indy outsiders either. Some of the biggest names in the business are behind this assembly line of artistic embarrassments that – at best, by default — give aid and comfort and side with the most vicious, imperialist, racist, sexist, anti-Semitic, homophobic, and theocratic enemy we have ever faced. And even with each of these cinematic disgraces bombing at the box office, our fat and privileged “Patriots Through Dissent“ have even more planned.

John Nolte, Big Hollywood 58 Comments [9/20/2010 3:53:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 33
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 76139

This kind of blows the whole "I was born this way" argument out of the water. Mehlman wasn't "born that way'. He had no genetic disposition towards being gay. The best he can say is that he enjoys gay sex. He was introduced to gay sex by someone else. He liked it. This is what you can expect from normalizing homosexuality. Only not quite normalizing. See, everyone is supposed to now be happy for him. He found himself. He showed courage by coming out of the closet. He should be respected for his decision. His wife will show her own homophobia and bigotry by summarily dumping him and not understanding. She won't show the sufficient amount of understanding. She will leave him and be castigated for taking her share of the marital assets. She will be treated just like Jim McGreevey's wife was treated.

Read my lips. There is no difference between Ken Mehlman and Tiger Woods. Engaging in perverted sex does not mean that the individual is absolved of his infidelity, or lying. They are the same lying SOBs who used their wives and families to hide a secret sin and provide a veneer of normalcy. Having Ken Melhman now advocate for same sex marriage has the same import and meaning as Tiger Woods advocating for polygamy.

Ken Mehlman is a disgrace to the republican party, to his family, to the nation and he should be forced into anonymity with the most alacrity as could be mustered.

Kathy30, FC 53 Comments [9/20/2010 3:52:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 50

Quote# 76187

I have used a similar argument when discussing how homosexuals are actually safer under strict Christian rules then if they were left to the rules or beliefs of Darwinistic athiests.

While Christians will declare that homosexuality is a sin and will work to keep it from becoming mainstream or acceptable as marriage, the opposite of that has a very ugly past. Christians are not called on to eliminate or kill people because they are homosexuals. However, while atheists will not view or see homosexuality as a sin or evil, they will and do eventually see homosexuals as a weaker “species” and that does lead to the “elimination” option.

Whether or not Darwin himself proclaimed specifically “survival of the fittest”, his dogma/doctrine/teachings lead to that way of thinking. If something is not making your species stronger or better then it can and should be eliminated. While most atheists are probably not for forced elimination, their dogma of life without a final judgement with God makes that option quite open.

It only takes a few powerful atheists in the right spots to force their “elimination” effort (if all Christians are neutralized or removed from the scene).

ScubieNuc, Free Republic 78 Comments [9/20/2010 3:51:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 118
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 76177

Americans blessing the Koran, particularly at this time of year, is the equivalent of Jews blessing a copy of Mein Kampf. Apparently 3,000 dead didn't get the message across. When jihadists get ahold of nukes, it will be more like 3,000,000. Maybe that will be sufficient.

Van Helsing, Moonbattery 39 Comments [9/20/2010 3:49:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 62
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 76175

I believe that only Christianity should be our religion and the only one allowed and I an not one. Original freedom of religion only meant sects of Christianity.

KING TUT OBAMA, Topix 52 Comments [9/20/2010 3:48:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 109

Quote# 76166

(Fundies sell crucifixes to keep terrorists out of your home)

How can we protect our homes, families and loved ones from an terrorism and war?
We will be spared from terrorism and war if we keep crucifixes on all our outside doors.
Jesus - "Pray and wear your sacramentals. And, also, My children, I ask you again to place a crucifix upon your door. Both front and back doors must have a crucifix. I say this to you because there will be carnage within your areas, and this will pass you by if you keep your crucifix upon your doors." (6-30-84)

Heaven’s Home Protection Packet...
Our Lord stated we must have crucifixes upon the outside of all of our outside doors. In the "Heaven’s Home Protection Packet" there are instructions, four crucifixes, and a tube of special cement for wooden or metal crucifixes. Wooden crucifixes adhere better to the doors when the aluminum strap is removed from the back. Put a light coat of cement on the back of the crucifix and then press it to the outside of the door. If you have any problems, you can call us at 616-698-6448 for assistance. This Heaven’s Home Protection Packet is available for a donation of $5.00 plus $3.00 shipping and handling. Send $8.00 to TLD Ministries, P.O. Box 40, Lowell, MI 49331. Item # P15

These Last Days Ministries, Inc., Does the Aurora Borealis forecast war in the United States? 103 Comments [9/19/2010 9:02:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 84

Quote# 76165

The Lord Jesus Christ controls human history. The BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Rig explosion was not an accident. Not was it scheduled by man. It was divine Judgment upon the Prostitute of Babylon, who runs commerce and the economy. Thus far, the Lord has done a remarkable job in keeping the oil out to sea in spite of all the whining by those who are blaming BP. The Lord brought the spill, and the Lord stopped the spill. It stopped as the Savior Planet came into precise conjunction with Midheaven to symbolize a notorious repair. The capping of the oil leak was delayed until July 15, where 15 is for a covering, which is God's solution.

Today as the leak was being stopped, there was a power blackout at Reagan Airport in Washington, DC. The power blackout symbolized the Judgment of Political Babylon. During the time of the blackout, the Senate was voting to pass the Wall Street Financial Reform Bill. This was on the Star Chart as the conjunction of the Red Planet and the Moon in Leo, which symbolizes the rape of the Prostitute of Babylon by the Evil King. A Catwalk on the Star Chart further linked Washington, DC and the Gulf to symbolize the rape of the Prostitute by the Evil King. Wait and see what the freedom loving, flag waving, distinguished and honorable government officials do to destroy BP and the oil industry.

And during this time, Elena Kagan was nominated to the US Supreme Court. That corresponds to the Ascendant sign of Libra and to the Teeter-Totter in the Chart. There was also a staff that stretched across the US on the satellite weather map. A staff symbolizes a rod of justice or a ruling scepter. It corresponded to God's Judgment of the US associated with the Judgment of the Prostitute of Babylon and the nomination of Kagan to the Supreme Court. Kagan is from New York City, which corresponds to Aries, the Descendant sign on the Star Chart.

Larry Wood,  BIBLE DOCTRINE NEWS 67 Comments [9/19/2010 9:01:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 99

Quote# 76161

Galileo Was Wrong is a detailed and comprehensive treatment of the scientific evidence supporting Geocentrism, the academic belief that the Earth is immobile in the center of the universe. Garnering scientific information from physics, astrophysics, astronomy and other sciences, Galileo Was Wrong shows that the debate between Galileo and the Catholic Church was much more than a difference of opinion about the interpretation of Scripture.

Scientific evidence available to us within the last 100 years that was not available during Galileo's confrontation shows that the Church's position on the immobility of the Earth is not only scientifically supportable, but it is the most stable model of the universe and the one which best answers all the evidence we see in the cosmos.

Robert A. Sungenis, Galileo Was Wrong 65 Comments [9/19/2010 9:00:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 113
Submitted By: physalis17

Quote# 76158

They ask you, 'suppose your son was a homosexual, what would you do?' Now this is what philosophers call a reductio ad absurdum. Suppose your son was a dog-man? Of course he cannot be my son if he is a homosexual, or a dog-man. He could be my anything else, but not a son. He cannot be anybody's son. Sons don't marry other men, nor do they allow other men to marry them.

Barrack Muluka, Afro Articles 67 Comments [9/19/2010 9:00:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 133
Submitted By: Slutmiko

Quote# 76132

By the 1970s, however, liberals had changed the meaning to represent people who favored abortion and identical roles or quotas for women in the military and in society as a whole.

Specifically, a modern feminist tends to:

* believe that there are no meaningful differences between men and women (The most significant belief underlying contemporary feminism is that there are no sex differences; therefore advocacy for equal rights must be extended to advocacy for equal results or outcomes.)
* oppose chivalry and even feign insult at harmless displays of it (see battle between the sexes)
* view traditional marriage as unacceptably patriarchal
* detest women who are happy in traditional roles, such as housewives,[4] and especially dislike those who defend such roles
* shirk traditional gender activities, like baking[5]
* support affirmative action for women
* prefer that women wear pants rather than dresses, presumably because men do[6][7]
* seek women in combat in the military just like men, and coed submarines
* refuse to take her husband's last name when marrying[8]
* distort historical focus onto female figures, often overshadowing important events (Eg: Henry VIII's wives take precedence in common knowledge to his actual reign.)
* object to being addressed as "ma'am," or feminine nicknames such as "sweetheart" or "honey";[9] object to other female-only names, such as "temptress"

Conservapedia, Conservapedia "Feminism" article 96 Comments [9/18/2010 4:40:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 88

Quote# 76131

I have a 'deep appreciation for the Islamic faith'...... 6 ft. deep to be precise.

I'd better not say more right now, or I'd probably offend the Quranimals.

Kenny Solomon, Jihad Watch 42 Comments [9/18/2010 4:40:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 59
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 76123

"GatesOfDawn" (what a ridiculous user name!), you lost credibility when you claimed that conservatives could add the truth on Wikipedia. It's like trying to reason with a lynch mob. Wikipedians do not tolerate truthful edits on politically sensitive issues.

Unfortunately, I doubt you have a clue about "modern science" and you have this backwards: it's liberals who just passed a hate crimes bill that criminalizes opinion, and it's liberals who censor prayer in public school. Conservatives believe in free speech.

Open your mind a bit, please, for your own sake. Godspeed.

Andy Schlafly, Conservapedia 60 Comments [9/18/2010 4:36:45 AM]
Fundie Index: 61
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 76119

Beyond the US, christians are being hunted down and killed like never before. I firmly believe that christians in the US have FAR too much protection. Part of the problem here is that there arent enough hard-line atheists willing to retaliate against this crime!
I say MURDER 2 CHRISTIANS for every atheist killed by religious violence. Furthermore I have to say that I sincearly wish I could legally KILL his family members since they are christian and I have developed a thirst for the blood of christians.

anonymous, Deep Thoughts 81 Comments [9/18/2010 4:35:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 112

Quote# 76124

You still won't admit that the vast majority of inventions have been American? Look, you have free will to deny basic facts, but your denial is astounding....

If you were genuinely interested in logic, then you'd spend some time reading or translating the Bible, the most logical book of all. But I suspect you're more interested in trying to reject the Bible than giving it equal time in your activities. Am I right?

["I'm Plymouth Brethren, rejecting the bible isn't in my "Modus Operandi"]

Andy Schlafly, Conservapedia 75 Comments [9/18/2010 12:19:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 66
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 76111

When contemplating college liberals, you really regret once again that John Walker is not getting the death penalty. We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too. Otherwise, they will turn out to be outright traitors.

Ann Coulter, The American Muslim 63 Comments [9/17/2010 6:10:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 86
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 76097

Terrorists have a philosophy. That philosophy is dialectical materialism, and it is fundamentally grounded in Darwinism. That philosophy will persist and continue to nourish the scourge of terrorism so long as Darwinism is not eradicated and no end is therefore put to Marxism and materialism. It is therefore essential that this philosophy be completely eradicated and people be educated against its foundation, Darwinism.

It is a grave error to condemn terror and lose victims to it on the one hand but for Darwinism to be taught in schools on the other. Darwinist education serves no other purpose than to reinforce communist terror. Being aware, but remaining insensitive to the fact that Darwinism constitutes the origin of communist ideology means remaining insensitive to terrorism itself. Nothing can come from condemning terrorism while Darwinism is still being taught in schools.

Darwinist ideology is based on an outdated theory that has been spilling blood and deceiving humanity through hoaxes and lies for some 150 years. All young people in schools must be taught and shown that this untrue theory built on lies is based on hoaxes and deceit. They must be told that the ideology of dialectical materialism and its supposed scientific basis, Darwinism, are false beliefs. Only then can realistic and effective measures against global terrorism be taken. Only then can those preventive measures be permanent and have permanent results. No other tactics can ever put an end to this scourge. In order for terrorism to be brought to an end its vital arteries must be completely severed and its intellectual infrastructure brought down.

Harun Yahya, Harun Yahya - An Invitation to the Truth 58 Comments [9/17/2010 6:08:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 79
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 76092

[On Don't Ask Don't Tell being ruled unconstitutional.]

So this female judge knows what military readiness is, and dismisses the actual Commanders views on it with a wave of the hand. Just another opening salvo in a long fight. I'm sure these activists will win, eventually. Then we can get pink guns and camo leotards.

HeIsEnough, Rapture Ready 50 Comments [9/17/2010 6:08:17 PM]
Fundie Index: 42
Submitted By: Tiger

Quote# 76098

[On Don't Ask Don't Tell being ruled unconstitutional.]

What has our judicial system come to when a female judge has standing to make a decision based on her opinion of a deleterious effect as to military environment? I’ll bet she is some college prude who has no sense about military life. I’ll apologize if wrong about having no military experience but not as far as her stupidity goes. My opinion is based on WWII experience when my platoon sgt in basic training told many of his teenage trainies to stay away from an older ex bank clerk(good stories about this guy).


noinfringers2, Free Republic 67 Comments [9/16/2010 9:44:31 PM]
Fundie Index: 66

Quote# 76096

[After being told that marriage is a human creation]

So basicly you think God is stupid and full of bullsh*t? Have any of you ever thought about how earth, humans, space, the sun, and the moon came from? Let me guess, you think a human man created all of them, am I correct?

Lord Dolmus, Animation Insider 86 Comments [9/16/2010 9:38:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 114

Quote# 76093

I absolutely loved our Muslim-In_Chief's Call to Reason this morning, when he bemoaned that "burning the Koran is against OUR traditions". (Who is "our"?? Americans burning shit for centuries: during Prohibition, wars, protests...witchhunts)

But there he goes again: he keeps revealing those muslim roots of his.

ObowOUT, Moonbattery 51 Comments [9/16/2010 6:19:07 PM]
Fundie Index: 79
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 76090

Several of my college classmates lost family members to the WTC attacks on 9/11. Muslims lost all their rights that day.

When they learn to love their children more than they hate our culture, they can have their right to complain back.

lo quilty, fark.com 71 Comments [9/16/2010 4:03:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 81

Quote# 76087

You know another gross thing I learned when I got older is that there really are Boogey Men. When I was a kid and it was getting dark outside we'd sometimes say to our friends "You better get home the boogy-man will get you!" We'd laugh and say there was no such thing.

The origin of the boogy man phrase stems from the distortion of the old word that described the homo. lifestyle as "buggary". Those men that engaged in buggary looked for male children like Mohammed the prophet did. Hence the boogey man will get you!

wade, Townhall.com 62 Comments [9/16/2010 4:03:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 91
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 76086

Over the summer, I was convicted of anti-gay hate speech. The most incredible thing about it was that I never set foot in Canada. The conviction happened while I was in Colorado. But the offense took place almost 15 years ago.

In the 1990s, a friend of mine announced that he was divorcing his wife because he had decided (after a couple of unhappy marriages) to pursue the gay lifestyle. My decision to support him was born out of ignorance. Not only was I harboring the illusion that there actually was such a thing as a gay gene. I was also ignorant of the fact that gays could be successfully cured through therapeutic efforts.

My decision to label my own verbal support of his lifestyle choice as “hate speech” makes sense only after one becomes educated about that lifestyle. According to the Centers for Disease Control, over 82% of all known sexually-transmitted HIV cases in 2006 were the result of male-to-male sexual contact. Moreover, gay and bisexual men account for over 60% of all syphilis cases.

Some will say that homophobia is the indirect cause of such numbers. They claim that fear of stigmatization keeps gays from seeking information before they become ill and from seeking medical help afterwards. But, clearly, that is not the case. In cultures where homosexuality is more accepted the numbers are worse. That is why I steadfastly maintain that supporting my friend’s decision to turn to the homosexual lifestyle was indeed an example of hate speech.

Most gays become angry when someone tells the truth about the health consequences of their lifestyle choice. The reason they get angry over the facts is because their conscience convicts them. When I came to realize that I helped make it easier for my friend to pursue his unhealthy lifestyle my conscience was convicted. I have regretted my verbal support of his decision ever since.

No sane person could ever posit that the act of rectal sodomy is safe, normal, or healthy. The rectum is a one-way street. It is a sewer meant for the expulsion of poison. Treating the rectum as a sex organ is damaging to the health – especially for the recipient of such abuse. That is why it is an act of hate, regardless of whether some choose to call it “love.”

Mike Adams, Townhall.com 67 Comments [9/16/2010 4:02:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 75
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 76077


A scientist in 1899 claimed the diameter is only 32 miles, some of his points made are very interesting.

''The sun is always somewhere between the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn, a distance admitted to be less than 3,000 miles; how then can the sun if it be so many thousand miles in diameter, squeece itself into a space of about 3,000 miles only...can a camel ride on a mouse, or a whale rush down the throat of a herring?

What is the diameter of the sun?

32 miles. If the navigator neglects to apply the sun's semi-diameter to his observation at sea, he is 16 nautical miles (nearly) in calculating the position his ship is in. A minute of arc on the sextant represents a nautical mile, and if the semi-diameter be 16 miles, the diameter is of course 32 miles. And as measured by the sextant, the sun's diameter is 32 minutes of arc, that is 32 nautical miles in diameter. If ever dispoof is attempted, it will be a literary curiosity, well worth framing.''

[later in the same thread]


I asked how you know the distance to the sun. You are claiming it's not an estimate but that you know the precise figure. So have you traveled to the sun and back? My point was to clarify the distinction between fact and estimates (guesses).
I'm open minded and read different theories. Unless you go up into space yourself there is no way of proving the exact size of the sun or location of celestial objects. It appears you base all your faith in what NASA etc tell you without ever questioning anything. I thought atheists were meant to be 'skeptics'?

Cassiterides, Evolution Fairytale Forum 92 Comments [9/16/2010 3:56:02 AM]
Fundie Index: 144
Submitted By: atrasicarius