1 2 3 4 5 10 12 | bottom
Quote# 9815

[Explaining why he can believe things in the bible like talking snakes]

yes, but you make it sound that rationality is the ultimate reality. Rational reasoning or logical reasoning can never apprehend ultimate truth, for they can never explain why they themselves exist. Atheists end up saying "well, things just are." So pure rationality doesn't seem rational to me

d-man, Unchained Radio 7 Comments [2/26/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 9816

i doubt that girls getting raped is just some random coincidence.. infact i dont beleive in coincidences.. hence.. EVERYTHING HAPPENS FOR A REASON..

and no.. abortions dont happen for a reason.. abortions happen to escape the consequences of poor actions..


TJ, Myspace 37 Comments [2/26/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 9817

You will find plenty of reason to believe in God and you have to "check your brains at the door" and take that leap of faith.

Rapture in SLC, Bibleforums.org 21 Comments [2/26/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 9820

From now on, I will only respond to people who have facts or rational explanations for their beliefs. But there are too many people here who have no rational refutation so they replace that with attacks, insults, and anger. I'd be angry too if i could not offer rational refutations. So I understand your anger. But anger is not rational so until you can replace it with rational refutations, then replying to irrational people is a waste of my time.

[A later post in the same thread]

Human reasoning is irrational, my friend.

Carico, Raving Atheist 16 Comments [2/26/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 9821

50 years ago most scientists supported evolution but with new discoveries but the tide appears to be turning. In the last 10 years there have been many scientists criticizing evolution. I recently read a good book by a professor of Biochemistry called “Darwin’s Black Box” which attempts to disprove evolution.

Even one of the leading atheists in the UK now believes in a creator. If Christians did not accept evolution 50 years ago when science was against them, why would they ever accept it now, with new discoveries in physics, biochemistry, and genetics, giving more support to a creator every day.

seekthetruth909, Christian Forums 28 Comments [2/26/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 9822

Speciation is merely hybriding. We have done it for thousands of years in breeding livestock and pets. Cross pollination...so what's the big deal?

DevotiontoBible, Christian Forums 9 Comments [2/26/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 9823

Lord would be nice if you came while in church this morning while with other brethren.

Comfort me, Rapture Ready 21 Comments [2/26/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 9801

it seems to me that, deep down inside his heart, the evolutionist is fully aware of his foolishness and is afraid of God, the Bible and the Christian. The abject fear they must be contending with never fails to reveal their unbidden [...]

They crudely mock others, they put words in people's mouths and then ctriticize what they say, and seldom fail to be accusatory (as is their master).[...]

Their intellect is voided by the foolishness of their beliefs and so they remain blind to the truth. They act like their spoiling for a fight but when challenged they immediately resort to others for "their" defense of the HoE.

Joman, Christian Forums 19 Comments [2/25/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 9804

Our bodies have been in constant need of water sinse the apes and before. Why haven't we learned how to drink from the rain?
Why did we evolve to have to wear shoes? I would think we would have tough feet.

dujavi, Christian Forums 28 Comments [2/25/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 9808

It's quite possible that two homersexuals could raise a perfectly good kid and perhaps even a kid that was a right handed hitter... but taken as a whole, kids with a mom and a dad who are both loving and attentive are in a far better situation then kids with just one mom, one dad, or two moms and two dads.

If the FTSDT buttsuckers can't see the truth in this simple axiom, then they have their noses too far up their lovers buttcracks and need to back out for a macro view.

SmellyFed, Free Conservatives 43 Comments [2/25/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 9809

[On South Dakota's pending ban on abortion.]

listen- if this becomes a nationwide law, think of how many rapists will be deterred by thte thought that the women that they rape will HAVE to give birth, and the father can be easily identified by the babe's DNA??? this will prevent a lot of rapes. part of the reason why rapes r so common is the fact that abortions are legal, so nobody would know if they raped someone. now they dont have that option.

emily, Myspace 43 Comments [2/25/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 12

Quote# 9810

I've never heard anyone who wanted their child refer to them as a "fetus." It's not like people go around saying "Oh when is your fetus due?" or "Is your fetus a boy or a girl?"

I think people made up that word so they could justify their actions of killing a human. They are removing humanity from the word "baby" by changing it to "fetus", so they think they aren't really killing a "baby" when, in reality, they are.


JoJo!, Myspace 25 Comments [2/25/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 9812

['In case you people haven't figured it out, Jesus does not hate faggots and babykillers!']

Jesus loves babykillers? Sure. God's right there, giving love and support to the abortionist at the same time that the freak is using tongs to tear a baby limb from limb. God hates him with a perfect hatred!

truthman, TheologyOnline 22 Comments [2/25/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 9766

[New rules at bibleforums.org]

As a Christian Board, we move from the premise that God is creator. Any argument, debate or discussion counter to this is not Christian and does not belong here and will therefore be deleted.

Matt14, Bibleforums.org 59 Comments [2/24/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 9769

Biblical assertions have the strong proof behind them of fulfilled prophecy, and the statistical science that is documented in "The Bible Code Bombshell." The fact that you are too pig-headed to even read that powerful scientific evidence limits the value of your opinion severely.

editor-surveyor, Free Republic 15 Comments [2/24/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 9770

do you think God just looked around one day, saw that life had appeared and evolved on earth without His involvement, and decided to stick a soul inside of us?

puroresu, Free Republic 32 Comments [2/24/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 9771

[Note: this person is a creationist]

Democracy and freedom will not work for people that are still stuck in the Middle Ages. Damn savages are too backward for progress.

nene, Free Conservatives 15 Comments [2/24/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 9772

Being full of doubt without ever having a truth would mean you're in need of defecation!! Doubt is great, but when you doubt too much then you really are full of it. I doubt, and have truth..doubted my God. But returned to the full truth.

Keith, Myspace 17 Comments [2/24/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 9775

So now, if man evolved from ape, and there are apes in all of our zoo's, would it be safe to say, that they are still evolving today and the zookeepers are just keeping the word mum about all of these half_ape, half_man babies being born? are they just pictured in the tabloids and forgotten about? or has Evolution just stopped?

jahguun, Fark 26 Comments [2/24/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 9778

The Pharisees were the liberals. God's law wasn't good enough, so they changed it to suit themselves, just as our modern-day liberals. Jesus was the conservative. He taught God's law as it is, He changed nothing. [...]

And so, the liberals killed Him as He was a threat to their self-serving religious and social liberalism. And so, Mopey claims Jesus was liberal to justify his own self-serving religious and social liberalism.

Frank Ernest, TheologyOnline 25 Comments [2/24/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 9783

[Why do women support abortion more than men? Is it because they are more immoral than men? Is that why we need to keep them barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen, and keep then undereducated so that they can't think for themselves?]

They don't.

I am just fine with the "barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen," part, but it is you that wants to use women, then kill the baby, and "keep then undereducated so that they can't think for themselves"

You are a murdering pervert.

CRASH, TheologyOnline 14 Comments [2/24/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 9784

Black Muslims, Christians and Jews have the right to religous abortions if they so choose, just like they have the right to be married according to their religious traditions and vows. No Black Muslim, Christian or Jewish woman should be forced to go to a secular abortion clinic where only white male abortionists are employed. If women have the unconditional choice to get medical abortions, then Black Muslim, Christian and Jewish men have the right to be present in the hospital or medical clinic where their wives are being operated on by white male abortionists. They also have the right to demand a proper Islamic, Christian or Jewish burial for their wives aborted fetus along with clergy representation at the funeral proceedings.

If state or private health plans won't pay for religious abortions, why should Black Muslims, Christians and Jews pay taxes to support secular abortions performed only by white male supremacists who favor the idea of homosexual marriages?

jcrawford, Debating Christianity 26 Comments [2/24/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 9785

[questions for "evolution proponents]

Why don't any ape type animals display a need to draw their history onto rock? [...]

How do you explain the non-existence of time? If you cannot explain it - does that make it false?

Messenger, PhysOrg Forums 18 Comments [2/24/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 9786

[Note: he's defending the faith, not criticizing it]

If you would wish to teach the doctrine that God's wrath is transfiguring for the non-believing sinner who has the good fortune to find himself the object of it, you should recognize that Biblical Christians will follow the lead of St. Paul and curse you, Martin Luther and ignore you, or John Calvin and kill you.

The Bible has forbidden God from changing his designs, it has forbidden God from telling something different, and it has forbidded you from thinking differently. Even if God would wish to tell humans something new, something different, Christians have inocculated themselves against hearing any new voice.

Delft, Christian Forums 9 Comments [2/24/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 9788

Well, as a Christian, I beleive that everything in the Bible is true. And in the Bible, it has a verse (i don't know exactly which one. my friend said he'd look it up for me, but I've got to ask him again) that says that God made man for woman and woman for man, not man for man, woman for woman, or woman for animal.

~*♥Blue Eyed Girl♥*~, Myspace 28 Comments [2/24/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
1 2 3 4 5 10 12 | top