Quote# 2947

Because the bacteria is still a bacteria after it mutates. It doesn't evolve into a wolf!

joelch2, Rapture Ready 19 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 2948

It gets a little old seeing so many evolution theologians (it is a religion), say that the parts that cannot be substantiated by empirical evidence [cosmology, stellar formation, abiogenesis] are 'not part of the evolution theory.'

NebraskaMan, Christian Forums 18 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 2949

Never in my statements did I say dinosaurs never existed. They existed and some might say they still do. I know a man named Paul Nation. He's done some missions in the Congo region. He was working with some very isolated pygmy tribes there. They were doing a bit of paleantology as well. Some of the natives there got a hold of one of his dinosaur books and began describing the temperments of some of the dinosaurs' pictures. For instance, they said that Triceratops are very aggressive towards elephants and usually chase them off. They commented that one of the longnecked dinosaurs(don't remember which) stay in the river all the time and are very shy and hard to spot. And when you combine this with the fact that the congo has only been 20% explored, you have a tangible theory.

Ringo, PlanetWisdom 14 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 2950

Abiogenesis is frequently defined as not part of evolution but this is disingenupous because the vast majority (95%) of leading biologists have to believe it is true because they do not believe in God.

Socratism, Theology Web 12 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 2951

This because evolutionists are acting CONSISTENTLY with a world view that says we are just rearranged pond scum, so there is no transcendent source of objective morality. Therefore it is perfectly CONSISTENT with their world view to bear false witness. After all, morality is merely some chemical process in the brain that conferred some survival advantage on their alleged ape-life ancestors. Conversely, creationists have strong motivation to be truthful, because Jesus is 'the truth' (John 14:6). So on this grounds alone, it makes more sense to trust creationist websites like Answers in Genesis and Institute for Creation Research over the gutter sites run by the infudgels etc.

Socrates, Theology Web 7 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 2952

Actually, Christians have every reason to be honest within their own world view, since Jesus is 'the truth' and He commanded us not to bear false witness. But atheists believe we are just rearranged pond scum with no transcendent source of morality. Therefore lying is perfectly consistent with their world view. That explains many of the posts by atheists on T[heology]W[eb].

Socrates, Theology Web 2 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 2953

If I felt that Atheism was as valid and worthy of respect in the same that Christian Theism is than I would not be a Classical Christian. So you can take that how you like-- I am not a reletavists and no one expects me to be except people with anti-religious agendas.

Calvinist, Theology Web 7 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 2954

There are many reasons that I can think of that He commanded [Saul] to kill EVERYONE [of the Amalekites], including children. Who would take care of them when their parents are dead, for one?

mixaleena, Christian Forums 14 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 2955

The 'Big Bang' theory can't exist... First of all, two dead cells cannot create a live cell, nor can energy. Second, just look around you! Do you think we got all of this from a collision of two rocks? Do you think two dead cells created a single microscopic live cell that evolved into all of this?

Servant77, Christian Forums 4 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 2956

It makes me wonder about Einstein's theory of E=MC2, why that is still a theory although it has proven itself time and again. Does the Big Bang theory have the kind of staying power to be tested endlessly and not falter? I think it will remain a theory and never be proven because for us to test this theory, we would have to create our own Big Bang.

sr. scholls, Christian Forums 13 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 2957

Oh, and without generalizations you can't have rational discussion. People fit into categories, and the category atheists best fit into is 'intolerant.'

Sambo83, BlizzForums 7 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 2958

[i][In a post about homosexuality, replying to 'The Levitical laws don't apply anymore'][/i]Christians are NOT bound by the word of God?!? GOOD ARGUEMENT!!!!

Ragnarok, Rapture Ready 9 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 2959

IMHO, if God considered something an abomination and immoral in the old testament, He isn't going to turn around and say it's okay in the new testament.

His4ever, Rapture Ready 11 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 2960

It's refreshing to find someone who hasn't been blinded by evolutionist propeganda.

son of zeke, Game Maker Community 6 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6